Started By
Message

What is yalls opinion about neutral site rivalry games?

Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:28 pm
Posted by Kidcube1
Member since Oct 2017
393 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:28 pm
I would like to see the other 12 sec teams play a neutral site rivalry game
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 4:31 pm
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
22809 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:30 pm to
I think neutral sites are awesome in general. They are where championships are played for.

I suppose season ticket holders might have another opinion.
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
54792 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

I would like to see all sec teams have a neutral site rivalry game


Yet you post no list of all 14 teams and said rivals

Do you talk about women on here and then don't post pics?
Posted by TeddyWestside
Georgia
Member since Jul 2017
2872 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:31 pm to
I much prefer on campus games to neutral site games in NFL stadiums. It works if it has the weight of tradition, like TWLOCP, but it can't and should not be forced.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67213 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:34 pm to
Georgia/Florida still does theirs in Jacksonville

There used to be several neutral site rivalry games:
LSU @ Arkansas was played in Little Rock
Alabama vs Auburn was played in the Iron Bowl in Birmingham
I think one of the Mississippi schools rivalries used to be played in Jackson.

The reason most of these ended was that the home stadiums of these schools became much larger and nicer than the fields at the neutral sites. The original reason for these neutral sites was that they were played in large cities with large stadiums, but most of the big SEC stadiums now hold at least 80k, so that doesn’t make much sense anymore.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 4:38 pm
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25886 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

What is yalls opinion about neutral site rivalry games?


Stupid.

Regardless of the result, I would have much rather home and home'd with UNC, NC State, and ECU instead of playing in Charlotte like 5 times over the past 10 years.

I'd definitely hate playing Clemson in Charlotte as opposed to playing in Clemson or Columbia.
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11301 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:44 pm to
I could see the benefits of moving the WLOCP to campus. Otherwise, Army-Navy and Texas-OU are the only rivalry games that should be played at a neutral site.
Posted by TigerAndBadger
Member since Aug 2017
234 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 4:57 pm to
Depends on the "Rivalry" and the location of said game.

MU-kU at Arrowhead makes a ton of sense.
MU-Illinois in STL, Ton of sense.
MU-Arky at Arrowhead, not so much. Although I give it a pass being the Friday Thanksgiving Weekend with students out of town.

I'd rather see home and homes though.
This post was edited on 9/26/19 at 5:01 pm
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 5:02 pm to
Hard to believe now but in 1968 there was a day/night double header with LSU-Alabama in the first game and Tennessee-Auburn at night at Legion Field in Birmingham.
Posted by DuckTalesLOL
Arkansas
Member since Aug 2018
6058 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 6:16 pm to
I hate them. We give up 2 home games a year due to this. 1 game a year to A&M at Jerry's World, and then every other year in Little Rock against Mizzou.

We have 2 home SEC games in Fayetteville this year. It's lame.
Posted by five_fivesix
Y’all
Member since Aug 2012
13837 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 6:27 pm to
I’d be in favor of a neutral site rivalry game, if you could play it at a third SEC schools stadium. Imagine the Iron Bowl at the Swamp or the DSOR at Neyland or LSU and whoever their rival is at Jordan-Hare.


Yea, dumb idea is dumb. But could you imagine the destruction at those facilities.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:36 pm to
I like them for other teams but I hate when LSU loses a home game because of an early season neutral site game.
Posted by drivebyag
Member since Feb 2014
1902 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 7:41 pm to
No its terrible but its a money maker and recruiting tool. Much rather home/home.
Posted by Pauldingtiger
Alabama
Member since Jan 2019
850 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 8:04 pm to
Glad they seem to be loosing steam. I like home and home. The neutral site games just rape the fans with tickets cost and hotel cost. I think the college towns need to reap the revenues.
Posted by FishFearMe
United States
Member since Jul 2015
7196 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:08 pm to
Sux
Posted by Jrv2damac
Kanorado
Member since Mar 2004
65399 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:17 pm to
Mizzou has an opinion of a certain game in arrowhead stadium

They ran like chickens
Posted by LSU Tigerhead
Metairie
Member since Nov 2007
4961 posts
Posted on 9/26/19 at 11:23 pm to
There's something to be said for visiting the campus/home field turf of opposing teams.

I'm not a fan of neutral site games. There's nothing like home-and-home games.
Posted by TexTgrTed
Parker County, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
5826 posts
Posted on 10/2/19 at 10:40 pm to
Go to 9 game SEC schedule to get rid of 1 cupcake.

4 home, 4 road, 1 neutral site with 50/50 ticket split.

Mix/match neutral site games among stadiums all over SEC footprint to give fans living in other areas a chance to see their team in person.

Make it happen, Skanky, make it happen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter