- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Northwestern Mutual - Should I?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:17 pm to hungryone
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:17 pm to hungryone
quote:
Again, if you have young children, you will feel differently. But I wouldn't quit working if my spouse died, or vice versa.
To me, term life is sort of a 1950s product. Big wage earning Dad and jobless/no degreed/nonprofessional Mom...so if Dad strokes out at 50, Mom needs the life proceeds so she doesn't have to become a carhop at Sonic to buy little Jimmy's football cleats. But lots of households do not look like Leave It To Beaver these days...you need to plan for your circumstances, not for the people in the glossy brochures from the life insurance company.
I get what you are saying. It's not something that is needed for everyone. I have two young children, and while my wife works, she makes about half of what I make. I carry enough life insurnace to put me in the ground, pay off all debts that both of us have, provide a decent amount for kids education, and a few bucks left to grow. Yes, I have retirement accounts, but we are young, and so they are not huge balances.
If I dropped tomorrow, my wife would have to continue working probably, and would want to, but, she would only have to worry about every day food, utilities, and expenses like that. Would not have to worry about kids education, debts, etc.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 3:19 pm to Shepherd88
Right on Shepherd. Term is so cheap, I don't really see why you wouldn't buy it. So what if she gets the $2M term benefit AND the retirement accounts?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:29 pm to baybeefeetz
Rule #1. Never take investment advice from a commissioned salesman.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 4:30 pm to baybeefeetz
Having said that, I think they are great for life and disability insurance
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:08 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
I am basically illiterate when it comes to investing
Try to become literate?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 5:23 pm to Stingray
quote:
I am basically illiterate when it comes to investing
Try to become literate?
Exactly, if a person cannot explain in simple language how a investment works and why they think it is a good place to put their money they shouldn't be investing in it, "because some advisor said it was a good plan" does not pass this test.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:10 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
You do know thos "retirement" funds you're referring to are taxable correct? So if you kick it over tomorrow and your wife decides to cash out your retirement plan becaus you thought that was the better idea then that $100k or whatever it is will be added to her income.
No wife (that's not legal in LA). But seriously, my better half wouldn't need to cash out the retirement funds cause he has a damn job. As do I. I'd just roll it over....
Regarding the cashed-out retirement funds, they're indeed taxed....but the whole point of this scenario was that the surviving spouse needed income...thus is going to be in a lesser tax bracket after the loss of spousal income.
My original point: term life can have some useful applications, but don't assume it is a necessary part of a financial plan. Work out what YOU need, according to your values and vision. Don't buy term life simply because you watched Mutual of Omaha commercials throughout your childhood.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:21 pm to hungryone
quote:
Don't buy term life simply because you watched Mutual of Omaha commercials throughout your childhood.
Mutual of Omaha commercials were not advertising term life, from this and your "1950s product" comment, I am thinking you may have term "term" insurance confused with Whole/Universal Life or other cash value products.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 6:35 pm to EA6B
Maybe I'm the idiot but term life is like $37/mo combined for my wife and I with a total policy value of $850k. Seems like a no brainer.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:49 pm to Golfer
quote:
Maybe I'm the idiot but term life is like $37/mo combined for my wife and I with a total policy value of $850k. Seems like a no brainer.
I am all for term life, and have nothing positive to say about cash value products, but have long given up arguing about it on here. I was just making the observation that from the other poster's comments it seems like they may have the two types of insurance confused.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 6:53 am to baybeefeetz
I'm pretty certain of a few things...
* anything other than most basic term insurance is a rip off
* NW Mutual funds will get hammered by a very basic ETF (S&P or something) over the long term due to their exorbitant fees
* Spend a few hours a week for a few months learning about retirement planning/investing and you'll be far ahead of the game in 2-3 months
Dump the NW guy and do it yourself. someone like Fidelity will help you do all of the things you need for fraction of the fees.
If NW nicks you for only 1%, and matches market performance which I'd bet they won't, over 30 years with a 100k initial investment, you'll be out $250,000 !
investment 100,000 100,000
return 7% 8%
years 30 30
future value $761,226 $1,006,266
good luck
* anything other than most basic term insurance is a rip off
* NW Mutual funds will get hammered by a very basic ETF (S&P or something) over the long term due to their exorbitant fees
* Spend a few hours a week for a few months learning about retirement planning/investing and you'll be far ahead of the game in 2-3 months
Dump the NW guy and do it yourself. someone like Fidelity will help you do all of the things you need for fraction of the fees.
If NW nicks you for only 1%, and matches market performance which I'd bet they won't, over 30 years with a 100k initial investment, you'll be out $250,000 !
investment 100,000 100,000
return 7% 8%
years 30 30
future value $761,226 $1,006,266
good luck
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:37 am to Ole War Skule
quote:
Dump the NW guy and do it yourself. someone like Fidelity will help you do all of the things you need for fraction of the fees.
If NW nicks you for only 1%, and matches market performance which I'd bet they won't, over 30 years with a 100k initial investment, you'll be out $250,000 !
investment 100,000 100,000
return 7% 8%
years 30 30
future value $761,226 $1,006,266
good luck
This. Absolutely this.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 8:59 am to Ole War Skule
if an investment guy can't beat the index funds by more than his fee, an investment guy is completely useless.
This is why it's so important to get a good investment person, and why there are so few of them out there.
This is why it's so important to get a good investment person, and why there are so few of them out there.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:09 am to Ole War Skule
quote:
* NW Mutual funds will get hammered by a very basic ETF (S&P or something) over the long term due to their exorbitant fees
They do not have their own funds, so I don't know what point you are trying to make here. You open an IRA at Fidelity, you are doing the same thing at a place like Northwestern. They may have access to some different mutual funds, but there is no "northwestern fund".
quote:
Dump the NW guy and do it yourself. someone like Fidelity will help you do all of the things you need for fraction of the fees.
An Adviser should be able to outpace basic etf's, including fee's (if we are talking about a fee based adviser). Curious, but what Fee's does Northwestern have that Fidelity doesn't have (honest question).
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 9:10 am
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:26 am to GoCrazyAuburn
Let me pose a question here. So this guy says he's illiterate when it comes to investing, and y'all are recommending he do the investing on his own with Fidelity. So let's say he takes his ~100k and invest it and it grows, then we have a correction, recession whatever and his investment, his nest egg, his retirement plan drops to 75k all of the sudden because he's purely in indexed funds with no management.
What do you think someone who is illiterate to investing is going to do?
What do you think someone who is illiterate to investing is going to do?
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:31 am to Shepherd88
The other problem with term and invest the difference is the discipline to do so consistently.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:32 am to Shepherd88
Exactly. That is why most here aren't actually advisers in any capacity. They are just enthusiasts. You don't use an adviser for the good times, you use them for the bad ones.
I find it funny how somehow it has become acceptable advice to say "just do it yourself" with something like investing. Every other specialized profession that would just be laughed at as advice.
I find it funny how somehow it has become acceptable advice to say "just do it yourself" with something like investing. Every other specialized profession that would just be laughed at as advice.
Posted on 8/19/14 at 9:57 am to Shepherd88
quote:
Let me pose a question here. So this guy says he's illiterate when it comes to investing, and y'all are recommending he do the investing on his own with Fidelity. So let's say he takes his ~100k and invest it and it grows, then we have a correction, recession whatever and his investment, his nest egg, his retirement plan drops to 75k all of the sudden because he's purely in indexed funds with no management.
* 24% active fund managers outperformed s&p over last 10 years
* yes, there is a risk an newbie will do something dumb like buy a mix of specialty/high risk ETFs, but just buying the S&P index will give them a much better chance than having a 'pro' pick a mutual fund mix for them
You and gocrazyauburn are correct to some extent that a novice can really screw things up, but that's only if they try to get smart...it's very simple
1. buy cheap term insurance
2. max your IRA and/or 401K
3. total savings of 10% of income
4. put everything in SPY, no stocks, mutual funds, annuities, etc
5. never sell anything until retirement
doing above will almost certainly put 90% of people in a better position than going to an investment advisor or broker
yes, they could screw it up as I said earlier, but we're not talking about rocket science here...it doesn't take a professional to follow the above plan.
that being said, I do own stocks and mutual funds, don't own SPY, but some other ETFs. Investing is a full time job for me and I know more that 99% of the 'advisors' out there as they are forced to spend the vast majority of their time selling instead of researching.
cheers!
Posted on 8/19/14 at 10:03 am to Ole War Skule
Point of the question is, people still want to press 0 to get that customer service rep rather than listen to an automated help line. You can't replace good advice and more times than not it is worth it.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News