- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC and UCLA headed to the Big 10. Update: It's official
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:23 am to KiwiHead
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:23 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Just destroyed the tradition of the Rose Bowl
Did they though? Now, every B1G East member will actually have a chance to play in the Rose Bowl. When was the last time Purdue, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa or Minnesota got to play in the Rose Bowl?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:35 am to Jwho77
quote:
How pissed would UH, Cincy, UCF and BYU be?
These schools and some of the new SBC schools acted way too quickly.
Also, my gut says Texas will want to get in on the BIG10 deal.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:38 am to glorymanutdtiger
quote:
Let’s end NCAA while we are at it
I think you can pretty much stick a fork in the NCAA at this point. Super conferences will have no tolerance for sharing the pie with these have-nots. Division One football is being redefined as we speak. They will ultimately decide the size of their coaching staff, how many scholarships they give out, and how many visits athletes can take to any school. To name just a few. These superconferences will be playing by their own rules and the rest of college football will be left to figure out what's left.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:50 am to Buckeye Backer
Illinois and Iowa have done so within the past decade or two.
Purdue, Indiana, and Minny? Probably not in my lifetime.
Purdue, Indiana, and Minny? Probably not in my lifetime.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:51 am to bamameister
quote:
These superconferences will be playing by their own rules and the rest of college football will be left to figure out what's left.
So basically even more of a glorified minor league to the NFL than it is now.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:01 am to RLDSC FAN
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 8:03 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:01 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
It’s obvious Big10 and SEC will eventually be like the AFC and NFC in pros
Exactly. At this point they should just make it official and break them up into smaller pro style divisions with a respective playoff bracket rather than continuing the charade of using the names of historic conferences. The old days of cfb are officially dead
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:10 am to Wally Sparks
quote:
So basically even more of a glorified minor league to the NFL than it is now.
NIL killed college football. We haven't got the full autopsy results back at this point.
I believe that the best of the best high school players will be sure they are in one of these super conferences in the future.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:41 am to teke184
Purdue lost to Washington in the rose bowl about 20 years ago.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:45 am to 632627
The extra millions of dollars each year over what they were getting from the PAC 12 will more than cover those extra miles.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 12:02 pm to MillerLiteTime
quote:
And call me crazy, but if they end up pulling in all the best Pac schools, I think Texas would listen to an offer to join up with a vastly superior academic conference.
again, what the hell does the academics of the conference have to do with anything?
Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here, how joining a conference b/c of superior academics is going to make Texas more money?
UT Alum: "I'm going to start donating to Texas now that they joined a conference of superior academics instead of the SEC. Playing Rutgers in football and thinking about their academics makes me just want to hand over my checkbook"
said no one ever.
The BIG10 is going to be a great football and basketball conference, and that's why they will make a ton of money. The SEC will be better, and at worst the same as the BIG10 when its all said and done.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 2:32 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
again, what the hell does the academics of the conference have to do with anything?
Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here,
I just saw this post, so I'll put this in financial terms you'll appreciate:
A lot has been made about the B1G exceeding $1 billion in athletic revenue soon. That's certainly an impressive number.
However, what the general public doesn't realize is that the precious in-state tuition everyone prizes is generally only funded to the tune of 20%-30% by your friendly low-tax state government. As state budgets tighten over the next few years, higher education is one of the few areas where politicians and policymakers can make cuts that largely go unnoticed by the general public.
Ever since the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act in the early 1980's, the rest of a research university's revenue comes from professors who are busy patenting new inventions, writing a steady stream of research grant applications, and fitting hundreds of students into a single classroom for first-year seminars. To cite just one example, the technological innovations in your iPhone weren't created by Apple. They were created by government funded research. Apple is really a design company that finds attractive ways to package technology.
So while that $1 billion from athletics is a nice - and very welcome - number, it pales in comparison to the $9.8 billion in research grants that the B1G Academic Alliance brings in. USC (an institution I'm very familiar with) has aspired to be viewed as a "peer" institution with universities like Northwestern, Michigan, and Wisconsin for decades. They've now achieved a 40-year plan of transitioning from a sleepy urban university to a research powerhouse that was set in motion in the administration of the late Steven Sample.
I know ya'll think this is all about sports, and a large part of it certainly is. But it's also an example of how elite institutions consolidate resources to recruit talented faculty and doctoral students, keep their alumni donations high, and strengthen their hold on powerful networks. One reason why USC and UCLA were able to keep such a tight lip about this move is that they knew their professors and mid-level admins would be largely thrilled with the B1G.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 11:57 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 3:30 pm to MikeyFL
Obviously academics and the academics and research are the lifeblood of a university. But what does that have to do with conferences? Conferences split athletic TV money. They don't split research money. What does being in a different conference have to do with research?
Posted on 7/3/22 at 3:50 pm to bamameister
quote:well except for the odd one that Coach Prime pulls
believe that the best of the best high school players will be sure they are in one of these super conferences in the future.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:00 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here, how joining a conference b/c of superior academics is going to make Texas more money?
BTAA currently funds over $10 billion a year to the B1G schools for research. That's in addition to the money the schools get that are AAU.
Texas will be the 5th member of the SEC that has AAU status. 13 of the 14 current members of the B1G are AAU members and USC and UCLA will make it 15 out of 16.
So yeah, it's a huge fricking deal and is a big reason why the B1G dwarfs other conferences in research money and grants.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm to TrueLefty
quote:
Are you saying that UW don't have a baseball team? That is odd.
Nobody cares about college baseball.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm to GumBro Jackson
quote:
They don't split research money
BTAA is over $10 billion a year for research and it's split between the B1G members so yes, they do split it.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:05 pm to VABuckeye
Couldn't get the chart to format properly on this site.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 4:09 pm
Posted on 7/3/22 at 6:39 pm to VABuckeye
They actually compile all the grant money and split it? Or they apply as a group for it? I'm ignorant to how that all works.
Posted on 7/3/22 at 7:23 pm to VABuckeye
The Big Ten members collectively conduct $10B in research, but the BTAA doesn't distribute that money. If, for example Michigan left the Big Ten, they would still conduct the same amount of research.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News