Started By
Message

re: USC and UCLA headed to the Big 10. Update: It's official

Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:23 am to
Posted by Buckeye Backer
Columbus, Ohio
Member since Aug 2009
9269 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:23 am to
quote:

Just destroyed the tradition of the Rose Bowl


Did they though? Now, every B1G East member will actually have a chance to play in the Rose Bowl. When was the last time Purdue, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa or Minnesota got to play in the Rose Bowl?
Posted by KillTheGophers
Member since Jan 2016
6237 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:35 am to
quote:

How pissed would UH, Cincy, UCF and BYU be?


These schools and some of the new SBC schools acted way too quickly.

Also, my gut says Texas will want to get in on the BIG10 deal.
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14492 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Let’s end NCAA while we are at it



I think you can pretty much stick a fork in the NCAA at this point. Super conferences will have no tolerance for sharing the pie with these have-nots. Division One football is being redefined as we speak. They will ultimately decide the size of their coaching staff, how many scholarships they give out, and how many visits athletes can take to any school. To name just a few. These superconferences will be playing by their own rules and the rest of college football will be left to figure out what's left.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96590 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:50 am to
Illinois and Iowa have done so within the past decade or two.

Purdue, Indiana, and Minny? Probably not in my lifetime.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29288 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

These superconferences will be playing by their own rules and the rest of college football will be left to figure out what's left.


So basically even more of a glorified minor league to the NFL than it is now.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35673 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:01 am to
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 8:03 am
Posted by NEOJoe
Member since Dec 2021
607 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:01 am to
quote:

It’s obvious Big10 and SEC will eventually be like the AFC and NFC in pros


Exactly. At this point they should just make it official and break them up into smaller pro style divisions with a respective playoff bracket rather than continuing the charade of using the names of historic conferences. The old days of cfb are officially dead
Posted by bamameister
Right here, right now
Member since May 2016
14492 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:10 am to
quote:

So basically even more of a glorified minor league to the NFL than it is now.



NIL killed college football. We haven't got the full autopsy results back at this point.

I believe that the best of the best high school players will be sure they are in one of these super conferences in the future.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12826 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:41 am to
Purdue lost to Washington in the rose bowl about 20 years ago.

Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
31337 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 11:45 am to
The extra millions of dollars each year over what they were getting from the PAC 12 will more than cover those extra miles.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25893 posts
Posted on 7/1/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

And call me crazy, but if they end up pulling in all the best Pac schools, I think Texas would listen to an offer to join up with a vastly superior academic conference.




again, what the hell does the academics of the conference have to do with anything?

Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here, how joining a conference b/c of superior academics is going to make Texas more money?

UT Alum: "I'm going to start donating to Texas now that they joined a conference of superior academics instead of the SEC. Playing Rutgers in football and thinking about their academics makes me just want to hand over my checkbook"
said no one ever.



The BIG10 is going to be a great football and basketball conference, and that's why they will make a ton of money. The SEC will be better, and at worst the same as the BIG10 when its all said and done.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 12:11 pm
Posted by MikeyFL
Las Vegas, NV
Member since Sep 2010
9621 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

again, what the hell does the academics of the conference have to do with anything?

Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here,


I just saw this post, so I'll put this in financial terms you'll appreciate:


A lot has been made about the B1G exceeding $1 billion in athletic revenue soon. That's certainly an impressive number.

However, what the general public doesn't realize is that the precious in-state tuition everyone prizes is generally only funded to the tune of 20%-30% by your friendly low-tax state government. As state budgets tighten over the next few years, higher education is one of the few areas where politicians and policymakers can make cuts that largely go unnoticed by the general public.

Ever since the passage of the Bayh-Dole Act in the early 1980's, the rest of a research university's revenue comes from professors who are busy patenting new inventions, writing a steady stream of research grant applications, and fitting hundreds of students into a single classroom for first-year seminars. To cite just one example, the technological innovations in your iPhone weren't created by Apple. They were created by government funded research. Apple is really a design company that finds attractive ways to package technology.

So while that $1 billion from athletics is a nice - and very welcome - number, it pales in comparison to the $9.8 billion in research grants that the B1G Academic Alliance brings in. USC (an institution I'm very familiar with) has aspired to be viewed as a "peer" institution with universities like Northwestern, Michigan, and Wisconsin for decades. They've now achieved a 40-year plan of transitioning from a sleepy urban university to a research powerhouse that was set in motion in the administration of the late Steven Sample.

I know ya'll think this is all about sports, and a large part of it certainly is. But it's also an example of how elite institutions consolidate resources to recruit talented faculty and doctoral students, keep their alumni donations high, and strengthen their hold on powerful networks. One reason why USC and UCLA were able to keep such a tight lip about this move is that they knew their professors and mid-level admins would be largely thrilled with the B1G.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 11:57 pm
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3115 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 3:30 pm to
Obviously academics and the academics and research are the lifeblood of a university. But what does that have to do with conferences? Conferences split athletic TV money. They don't split research money. What does being in a different conference have to do with research?
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47946 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

believe that the best of the best high school players will be sure they are in one of these super conferences in the future.
well except for the odd one that Coach Prime pulls
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35642 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

Explain to me just speaking in terms of dollars, b/c that's all that matters here, how joining a conference b/c of superior academics is going to make Texas more money?


BTAA currently funds over $10 billion a year to the B1G schools for research. That's in addition to the money the schools get that are AAU.

Texas will be the 5th member of the SEC that has AAU status. 13 of the 14 current members of the B1G are AAU members and USC and UCLA will make it 15 out of 16.

So yeah, it's a huge fricking deal and is a big reason why the B1G dwarfs other conferences in research money and grants.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 4:03 pm
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8778 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that UW don't have a baseball team? That is odd.


Nobody cares about college baseball.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35642 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

They don't split research money


BTAA is over $10 billion a year for research and it's split between the B1G members so yes, they do split it.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35642 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 4:05 pm to
Couldn't get the chart to format properly on this site.
This post was edited on 7/3/22 at 4:09 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76560 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 6:39 pm to
They actually compile all the grant money and split it? Or they apply as a group for it? I'm ignorant to how that all works.
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3115 posts
Posted on 7/3/22 at 7:23 pm to
The Big Ten members collectively conduct $10B in research, but the BTAA doesn't distribute that money. If, for example Michigan left the Big Ten, they would still conduct the same amount of research.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram