- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If we were to get Leach
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:19 am
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:19 am
rip RB's? 
8
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:20 am to hg
We need a QB if we get Leach. You don't think Jefferson can run his offense huh?
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:22 am to Broham
No, we don't have the qb unless we get Mett.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:22 am to Broham
quote:
If we were to get Leach
We need a QB if we get Leach. You don't think Jefferson can run his offense huh?
I think Lee could run it.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:24 am to hg
Leach would get some use out of the RB, just not as much as they do now.
I'll take less RB if it means we have a vastly improved passing game
I'll take less RB if it means we have a vastly improved passing game
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:29 am to hg
You think ESPN hates us now? Wait 'til we get this guy! 
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:30 am to Boh
I don't understand everyone's love affair with Leach.. When I think of LSU I don't think air raid.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:33 am to hg
not necessarily
Texas Tech averaged 252 rushing attempts per year under Leach, or about 21 per game
so while there would be a greater emphasis on the pass, the running game would not be completely thrown aside
Texas Tech averaged 252 rushing attempts per year under Leach, or about 21 per game
so while there would be a greater emphasis on the pass, the running game would not be completely thrown aside
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:39 am to arobbi3
Do you think of Air Raid when you think of Oklahoma under Stoops?
Because in the 1 year that Leach was OC under Stoops at OU they averaged 104 on the ground and 327 in the air per game (431 yds of offense per game).
Because in the 1 year that Leach was OC under Stoops at OU they averaged 104 on the ground and 327 in the air per game (431 yds of offense per game).
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:43 am to b rod lsu
And how many receiving yards did RB's have?
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:49 am to arobbi3
quote:
When I think of LSU I don't think air raid.
I wonder if the people that bitch about winning "ugly" 20-14, would bitch about winning 38-34.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:50 am to MOT
i dont think hiring leach as OC automatically makes us a bad defensive team though
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:51 am to hg
Don't want Leach. His offenses didn't do that much against really good defensive teams like OU and Texas. Granted he had no defense because he didn't care about defense but they played bowl games against defensive teams like Bama and lost. He rushed the ball but did not have the running game it takes to win in the SEC.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:52 am to DBG
quote:
i dont think hiring leach as OC automatically makes us a bad defensive team though
It isn't automatic, but there would be a dropoff and it would get worse over time.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:53 am to DBG
it doesn't make us a bad defensive team at all. I think of it this way there is no possible way they can be more worn down than they have been the last 2 years. we probably give up a few more points this next year bc of no pp and sadly more hatcher on the field but the air raid wont hurt our d.
eta it might actually make us even better on d. we might give up a few more big plays doing this but with more points by our o we can apply even more pressure on d. we could blitz more knowing if we get burned its ok because the o will not shite the bed.
eta it might actually make us even better on d. we might give up a few more big plays doing this but with more points by our o we can apply even more pressure on d. we could blitz more knowing if we get burned its ok because the o will not shite the bed.
This post was edited on 11/29/10 at 11:55 am
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:55 am to MOT
how when leach is the oc? how is our d going to get worse bc of the oc?
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:56 am to texastigerr
his offense isnt why he lost and bowl games aren't the best measuring stick for things considering unless its a bcs bowl there really isnt much on the line.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 11:59 am to b rod lsu
"Do you think of Air Raid when you think of Oklahoma under Stoops?
Because in the 1 year that Leach was OC under Stoops at OU they averaged 104 on the ground and 327 in the air per game (431 yds of offense per game)."
Have you watched any of Oklahoma since they had Sam Bradford?
What about this year with Landry Jones? His lowest number of passing attempts is 29 against Texas tech.
We may not be throwing it every down with Leach, but what about his style is so appealing? Just because it's a step up from crowton doesn't mean it's in the right direction.
Because in the 1 year that Leach was OC under Stoops at OU they averaged 104 on the ground and 327 in the air per game (431 yds of offense per game)."
Have you watched any of Oklahoma since they had Sam Bradford?
What about this year with Landry Jones? His lowest number of passing attempts is 29 against Texas tech.
We may not be throwing it every down with Leach, but what about his style is so appealing? Just because it's a step up from crowton doesn't mean it's in the right direction.
Posted on 11/29/10 at 12:00 pm to heartbreakTiger
I'm telling you guys you don't want Leach, it will bad
Posted on 11/29/10 at 12:00 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
how when leach is the oc? how is our d going to get worse bc of the oc?
How many good defenses did he have at Tech?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News