re: If we were to get Leach

he was the head coach at tech that has nothing to do with him being the oc at LSU. at tech he ignored d. at LSU its his job to only worry about o if we hire him. so now how will he cause us to have a bad d?

solid point but our o already gives them no time to rest and puts pressure on them because they can't score. so we had a little more risk for turnovers which we already do enough of anyways but we had way more points. it allows our d to have a little more room for messing up.

like i said we probably give up a few more points per game but with a better offense thats not really a big deal.

this point was a lot better than mot just saying have you seen his d's at tech.

Do not want his butt anywhere near that team. Do not need trash like that around LSU because we have been the cleanest program and I want to keep it that way!

quote:

---

Imagine if our D wasn't constantly playing to prevent the other team from winning.

---

Isn't that what all defenses in all sports do? I think u meant playing from behind. In which case I can definitely see the benefits to playing with a nice lead

i wasn't aware that texas tech had any kinda infractions.

i dont think he is trash because he upset a pussy james kid

yep we would have leads on teams making them throw on us alot more. we could pin our ears back and go after qbs.

people forget on top of him having jack shite to do with d that the texas tech d wouldn't have any player sniff the starting line up here.

just imagine if our defense wasnt always on the feild

quote:

---

Imagine what they could do if our O didn't have 3 and outs every drive?

---

After what I saw with Leach at TT, our defense would still be back on the field after 3 plays. True it would likely be 7 more points, but they would still get worn out by the end of the game. Like someone said earlier, is it really better for us to win 48 to 44 than 20 to 14?

Personally, I would rather win 30 to 10 with a balanced offense that scores after long, long time consuming drives that keeps the defense fresh rather than playing a shoot out.

So again, is Leach an upgrade? Sure. But is he as good as we could hope for? I don't think so.

Guys listen to serious a/k/a sirius radio. Some of the callers who know more than I ever will are saying that the Patriots stole a lot of their shite from Leach, in incredible detail btw, that is why that they took Welker, etc. He won 3 our of last 5 versus OU, you saw what he did to Texas. It is akin to him taking Vandy and kicking our arse and Bama's 3 out of last 5.

He never had enough talent there to really win, yet he did. As an OC with Mettenberg, and our running backs and rec we would be unstoppable. Plus he runs an up tempo fast release Offense, so the line doesnt have to be great.

I can tell you this the rest of the Big 12 was toasting champagne when texas tech fired him.
They are damn glad to see him geaux as he was making them look bad.

If he difficult sometimes yes. Did the adminstration hate him yes. Did the administratioin hate Saban, yes.

Do you really give a damn about making the adminstrations life easy or do you want another NC? At 150k and up, they should be able to deal a little adversity in my book. Or let them come out into real world and give it a try.

quote:

---

Chicot

---

So you're saying our D would be on the field the same amount of time as they currently are, AND we would score massive points?

So top 10 D and top 10 O. Awesome.
Gotcha. Although I understand what you're saying, the argument that our D would get tired because they would be on the field is weak. Would they be on the field any longer than they are now when we keep going 3-0? No.

I'm not saying Leach is the best choice, FWIW I'd prefer DH, but the argument that the reason Leach shouldn't come, because our D would suffer, is invalid.