Started By
Message

re: Donovan: Does he have a point or sour grapes?

Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:43 pm to
Wasn't ever that high on wondo as a player. But definitely agree that you need a natural poacher on the squad.

The Donovan question is tough. Assuming that Jk thought Davis could legitimately hold his own against Germany, Donovan replaces Chandler? Max? Zusi?
That question gets tougher after seeing how it all played out. No one was calling for zysi or max to be dropped prior
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

The Donovan question is tough. Assuming that Jk thought Davis could legitimately hold his own against Germany, Donovan replaces Chandler? Max? Zusi? That question gets tougher after seeing how it all played out. No one was calling for zysi or max to be dropped prior


You couldn't leave Zusi off before tee WC, which is why I said after his performance. He just looked like he was in over his head and couldn't keep his composure on the ball.

The real question is Davis over Donovan. I don't know if there's a knowledgeable fan on this board that can make a logical a argument for it.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31898 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

Assuming that Jk thought Davis could legitimately hold his own against Germany


This is a crazy assumption.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:58 pm to
Just to be clear here, Donovan's point is that we were not set up to attack enough and "go for it" against Belgium.
quote:

Because I would have said let’s go for it. I want a chance to go for it and try to win the game.”

He's sure enough of that to criticize the coach publicly over it.

And yet:
Zonal Marking
quote:

USA midfield very open

quote:

The game was played at great pace, with both teams attempting to play high up the pitch and dominate.

quote:

It’s difficult to remember another side at this World Cup leaving their defence so open throughout the game

quote:

Klinsmann throwing on Chris Wondolowski in place of Zusi was a staggeringly bold move in such an open game

quote:

USA afforded them so many counter-attacking opportunities


Jurgen can definitely be criticized for his tactics against Belgium, but not because they weren't aggressive enough. If anything, he put too much faith in his players and asked them to "go for it" too much. The plan seemed to be that they would either win or go out in a ball of flames.

So Landon's wrong (just like everyone who mistook last-ditch defending and heroic goalkeeping for "bunkering") anyway.

He basically seems to have learned nothing from all of this.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:58 pm to
I like Donovan and really appreciate all he's done as part of the team. And he has a right to voice whatever opinion he wants. But I'm comfortable with having the decisions for the team in Klinsman's hands rather than his. Maybe Donovan can get into coaching and work his way to where he is the person making those decision for the team one day but he's got some work to do before that happens if that is the direction he goes in.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37260 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 1:34 pm to
Was going to reply but

quote:

uway



Sums it up well.

quote:

Donovan at 27 wasn't good enough to counter-attack his way to beating Ghana. He is certainly not good enough now to single-handedly beat Belgium or Germany.


Pretty solid point too.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 2:02 pm to
who is the kid that came on and scored vs Belgium? He seems to be the future of US Soccer it seems (wasn't the youngest US player?)
Posted by Sheep
Neither here nor there
Member since Jun 2007
19493 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

That Cameron shank was totally about tactics.




I do love how people continue to harp on this.

I guess nobody saw Van Buyten (one of the better defenders in Europe over the last 15 years) shithit a clearance in extra time that ballooned from the 6 all the way to the 18.

I particularly liked the guy who was appalled and thought it shouldn't even happen in a U15 game.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

I guess nobody saw Van Buyten (one of the better defenders in Europe over the last 15 years) shithit a clearance in extra time that ballooned from the 6 all the way to the 18.


Coincidence that Jurgen coached him at Bayern?
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

I guess nobody saw Van Buyten (one of the better defenders in Europe over the last 15 years) shithit a clearance in extra time that ballooned from the 6 all the way to the 18.


Bad clearances happen all the time. A bad clearance that goes backwards and lands right at the feet of an attacker, 10 yards from goal, doesn't happen too often. It really was a freak play, but as a defender you're better off skying one like Van Buyton than having one go backwards off your shin like Cameron's.
This post was edited on 7/3/14 at 2:47 pm
Posted by kilo
Member since Oct 2011
27422 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 2:51 pm to
quote:

Coincidence that Jurgen coached him at Bayern?
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
14401 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 3:04 pm to
I saw the E.J. posts here and in other places out in social media.

Two words.
Upton. Park.
Look it up. Spectacular fail that sums up E.J. and it was at club level, not against international competition.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34896 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

The team that drew Germany and had beaten Donovan-led US teams in two straight World Cups.



This transitive property shite doesn't hold water even when talking about 4 teams in the same group in the same tournament, it damn sure doesn't hold water when referring to 2006.

quote:

Like scoring 3 goals in 11 matches in MLS this year? That guy totally would have given us more goals in this tournament.


There's a lot more to it than just scoring, but come on, you already knew that. He's created a ton of chances in MLS this year and has always excelled in that role for us. As Sheep said, the things he does well are the things we were lacking throughout the tournament. There's no way to spin that being a good decision, especially when Brad Davis is the replacement.

quote:

Never mind that we equaled our goal total from 2010 when he was in his prime and playing against much lesser competition.


Transitive property again; totally invalid and irrelevant. Probably not a good point to use anyway since he scored the goals that helped us advance out of that group.

quote:

Yep, in a World Cup where team spirit, motivation, and fitness were going to mean everything to our chances of advancing, it was MONUMENTALLY stupid to leave off a player who chose not to participate in early qualifying, publicly declared his intentions NOT to practice hard, and showed up out of shape and form to the final pre-camp friendly (according to Sheep, Broski, etc. Do I need to link those posts again from the Mexico friendly, or will you just be honest and admit/accept that he was fat in the spring?).



Literally all of this has been de-bunked so many times that there's just no damn point in rehashing it.

quote:

Donovan at 27 wasn't good enough to counter-attack his way to beating Ghana.He is certainly not good enough now to single-handedly beat Belgium or Germany


This is terrible logic. Why are you insisting on this transitive nonsense when it makes no sense at all?

Nobody is saying he would have taken down the Germans or Belgians by himself. We're saying he would have given us a better chance to win than other players that we did bring. It's not 1 v. 11, it's not all about what he can do alone, but more as a functioning piece of a cohesive unit.

Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
70855 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

Donovan at 27 wasn't good enough to counter-attack his way to beating Ghana. He is certainly not good enough now to single-handedly beat Belgium or Germany.


Neither was anybody on our team.

quote:

Pretty solid point too.



What are we arguing?

I'm sure as hell not saying that Donovan was the end-all-be-all difference that this team needed. Doesn't mean that he didn't deserve to go over Brad Davis.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28259 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

shithit


Will be using in the future.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 7/3/14 at 6:24 pm to
quote:


Literally all of this has been de-bunked so many times that there's just no damn point in rehashing it.

None of what you quoted there has been debunked. It just doesn't fit the "Landon did nothing wrong, it's all Jurgen's fault" position, so y'all refuse to accept plain as day facts.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram