- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is legally in charge in Ukraine?
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:49 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:49 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'd bet my current bank account and all future earning that you have not the slightest clue about Marxism.
That is what everyone who advocates Marxism says. What is so complex that no one can understand it when they scoff at it.
1
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:49 pm to LSURussian
I'm not sure why that is a 'boom'
The US has been doing worse than what Russia did by 'invading' Ukraine.
The US has been doing worse than what Russia did by 'invading' Ukraine.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:49 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Your ethics on here are disgraceful.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure why that is a 'boom'
The US has been doing worse than what Russia did by 'invading' Ukraine.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:50 pm to TWD7105
quote:
That is what everyone who advocates Marxism says. What is so complex that no one can understand it when they scoff at it.
No it's really not that complex, but I'm certain you think it means big government, authoritarianism ect
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:51 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'm not sure why that is a 'boom'
Because he linked to a comment by you which completely contradicts your 'not really.' Are you that dense?
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:51 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'd bet my current bank account and all future earning that you have not the slightest clue about Marxism.
You'd likely lose that bet.
All he'd need would be a slight clue to win.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:52 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Stupid diversion on your part since you are the poster who argued over 10 pages in a thread when you were posting under your previous screen name that the Federal Reserve is a private bank without "anything to do with the government."
I was the one pointing out to you the governmental oversight of the Fed.
Have you now changed your mind about the Fed???
I argued that it wasn't an official entity of the government, because it's not.
Way to lie, per usual.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:53 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'd bet my current bank account and all future earning that you have not the slightest clue about Marxism.
I read your thing about Marxism back in the Sailor post, and answered. You...bailed!
I have no problem with the Marxist Theory. Or the possibility that when folk get their VISIONARY FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE, it might be the ideal model. But the degree of cooperation necessary for your idealist Marxism to be successful, now...is an existential impossibility.
Realism trumps Idealism...because Realism is now. Idealism is the future.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:54 pm to RCDfan1950
Government, Marxism, and Human Nature are incompatible.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:55 pm to Sleeping Tiger
take the bet, TWD
a person of ST's ethics has just made a very, very stupid bet
a person of ST's ethics has just made a very, very stupid bet
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:56 pm to RCDfan1950
quote:
I read your thing about Marxism back in the Sailor post, and answered. You...bailed!
I have no problem with the Marxist Theory. Or the possibility that when folk get their VISIONARY FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE, it might be the ideal model. But the degree of cooperation necessary for your idealist Marxism to be successful, now...is an existential impossibility.
Realism trumps Idealism...because Realism is now. Idealism is the future.
I didn't bail, I sought you out in another thread and asked you to respond to my response to your concern. Your final post was totally incoherent and had nothing to do with our dialogue.
I literally feel like I'm reading the label on Dr. Bronners soap when I read your posts.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 3:57 pm to TWD7105
quote:
Government, Marxism, and Human Nature are incompatible.
What does this even mean?
Posted on 3/4/14 at 4:12 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I didn't bail, I sought you out in another thread and asked you to respond to my response to your concern. Your final post was totally incoherent and had nothing to do with our dialogue. I literally feel like I'm reading the label on Dr. Bronners soap when I read your posts.
And I went and dug that thread up, and honestly answered your critique.
Yeahhhh! Soap. Good enough!
Posted on 3/4/14 at 4:14 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:Bullsh*t!!!
I argued that it wasn't an official entity of the government, because it's not.
That's NOT what you were arguing, mo.
You specifically wrote SEVERAL TIMES that the Fed is COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT from the federal government. No gray area.
quote:
And the Federal Reserve IS completely independent from our federal government. It is totally independent from our federal government. No gray area.
LINK
You even went so far to say that "the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express."
quote:LINK
I bet most Americans don't even know the Federal Reserve is no more federal than Federal Express. It's not a part of our Federal Government.
Are you now saying it IS a part of the the federal government?
quote:The proof of which one of us is lying and the BOOM is above.....
Way to lie, per usual.
ETA: And he's gone, signed off. He does that a lot when he's been caught in a lie.
This post was edited on 3/4/14 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 3/4/14 at 4:17 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:He only bet what's in his bank account. So.....a $5 bet.
take the bet, TWD
a person of ST's ethics has just made a very, very stupid bet
Posted on 3/4/14 at 4:54 pm to LSURussian
The FED is not a part of the federal government, it's not an official government entity. That's what I was claiming in that thread, and you know it. It is completely independent in the sense that I'm talking about, it's not at all federal.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 5:01 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
The FED is not a part of the federal government,
quote:So why would a privately owned company have to be transparent?
Things like openness and transparency
Like the FED?
It's either a part of government and should be transparent, Mr. Alex Jones, or it's a private company who only answers to its shareholders, which none of us are.
You can't have it both ways, mo.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 5:08 pm to LSURussian
quote:
So why would a privately owned company have to be transparent?
It's either a part of government and should be transparent, Mr. Alex Jones, or it's a private company who only answers to its shareholders, which none of us are.
You can't have it both ways, mo.
The FED wants to act like a government agency, it wants (and does) have great control over our reality.
If it wants to masquerade as a government agency and rule the economic world, then I'd expect them to be transparent.
As it is now they have it both ways. They're able to pretend to be an official arm of the government while remaining mostly closed to transparency.
Posted on 3/4/14 at 5:15 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
I'm certain you think it means big government
It's kind of gotten a bad name under all the revolutionaries who used it to overthrow their governments and then turned out to be dictators, right? I mean, in a perfect world marxism would be put into place everywhere, but we don't live in a perfect world so it is by definition impossible. So maybe, just maybe, we can come to the conclusion that anyone riding Karl Marx's dick is more of a contrarian than an intellectual.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News