Started By
Message

re: When did "exposing corruption" become "interfering with an election"??

Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

It's laughable that so many here ignore that.



Correct and the fact the so many on the left are fine with the collusion between the MSM and HRC's campaign is amazing.

Further proof that they aren't liberals at all...just leftist that any totalitarian regime would be proud of.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

I guess someone needed to hack the private emails of the RNC and the Trump campaign since the "media wouldn't do it's job" to somehow get that information. Am I doing this right?



You can make up any fantasy situation you want. Why are you asking for supportive affirmations??
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Into the bin you go.


Yer funny! So you got that goin' for you...which is nice.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

the collusion between the MSM and HRC's campaign is amazing.


Translation: "I don't know how traditional Presidential campaigns are run but I think this looks like collusion or corruption or something bad!!1!"
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 4:58 pm
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50270 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Translation: "I don't know how traditional Presidential campaigns are run but I think this looks like collusion or corruption or something bad!!1!"


I support posts like this and any future posts that mock those of us who actually read the emails.

Keep them coming! You will lose again and it will be glorious.
Posted by Jeff Boomhauer
Arlen, TX
Member since Jun 2016
3552 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

Of course not - but if the drug dealer gets off without consequences, then something is amiss.



The drug dealer would get off if the way the cops learned of him was determined to be illegal search and seizure
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Is that the most "corrupt" act implicated in all the emails?


No. Most corrupt things are not singular events. The whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

This is no different.
Posted by Puck82
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
23648 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

Translation: "I don't know how traditional Presidential campaigns are run but I think this looks like collusion or corruption or something bad!!1!"


Translation: "I think I'm an intellectual superior so I will spout off some nonsense and pretend that you know nothing all the while being a complete pompous arse."

You flat out know what took place between the media and HRC's campaign was not the "traditional" way Presidential campaigns are run and fits the very definition of collusion.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 5:07 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

The drug dealer would get off if the way the cops learned of him was determined to be illegal search and seizure

Non sequitur.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:07 pm to
Reading the emails won't do a lot of good if someone doesn't have a proper basis to understand common campaign practices such as media outreach (not talking about the debate question leak tho - bad Donna bad!).
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

while being a complete pompous arse."


Ah you might be right here. Gonna think about this for a little bit.

Yeah I could have made my point in a better way. Also broke Rule #3 of my posting rules.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 6:01 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140351 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:09 pm to
Why in the frick do people infer that they are experts in Presidential elections when they aren't.

That poster is another we can thank for Hillary losing.

Bubbles boys should be celebrated IMO. Thanks to them, we won.

Thanks Bubble dwellers. You made this happen.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

Reading the emails won't do a lot of good if someone doesn't have a proper basis to understand common campaign practices such as media outreach
The conclusions are either

1. This is a normal practice. Nothing untoward about this whatsoever and that means the hacks did not influence the election at all

Or

2. This is a normal practice, which was exposed the the American public in all its naked glory, and the American people soundly rejected this practice and those that conduct themselves this way.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Interference in the fundamentals of a nation's democratic processes is about as big as a cyber attack can get short of tanking an economy.
Maybe you are the one true patriot who believes this. But 100% of the media, 100% percent of the politicians making a big deal out of this, and 100% of the agency heads on the stand today are do No this out political butthurt in an attempt to deligetimize Trump and his presidency and are using this false facade of patriotism and love of country to hide behind.

Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

No, what I'm saying is they're v was no correpution exposed



Now that right there is funny.
Posted by rumproast
Member since Dec 2003
12094 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 6:31 pm to
So....if a peeping tom sees you playing Parchesi, and while illegaly peeping, sees you cheat at Parchesi....and then comes in and tells the other side that you were cheating at Parchesi.....the Peeping Tom has thus rigged the Parchesi game. Makes perfect fricking sense.
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 1/5/17 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Translation: "I don't know how traditional Presidential campaigns are run but I think this looks lik


Exactly who fed HRC debate questions?And which campaign did John Harwood ask approve
debate questions?And when exactly did this happen with the Trump campaign or previous
Republican candidates?

Give me examples of similar incidents. you arrogant POS

This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 8:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram