- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
When did "exposing corruption" become "interfering with an election"??
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:23 pm
This is the dumbest shite I've ever heard. You blow the whistle on somebody doing improper and bad stuff, and you are then accused of "rigging" something by exposing said bad stuff. This doesn't even make sense.
18
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:23 pm to rumproast
Well it keeps the attention off of the content.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:26 pm to rumproast
One thing you have to give the demorats... their spin game is skrong
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:26 pm to rumproast
What they exposed was actual election interference via Mrs. Brazile giving debate questions to Team Hillary.
Somehow, that has not been addressed.
Somehow, that has not been addressed.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:27 pm to rumproast
Exposing corruption isn't really happening.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:29 pm to rumproast
When the Democrats are the ones hurt by it.
The MSM plays this game all the time, only they get leaked information from other sources against Republicans. No one bats an eye when CNN breaks a sex scandal.
The MSM plays this game all the time, only they get leaked information from other sources against Republicans. No one bats an eye when CNN breaks a sex scandal.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:30 pm to rumproast
quote:
You blow the whistle on somebody doing improper and bad stuff, and you are then accused of "rigging" something by exposing said bad stuff.
So if a burglar breaks into my house and discovers I'm a coke dealer, his crime is forgiven?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:45 pm to rumproast
To suppress a narrative you create a bigger one. Gov 101
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:49 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
So if a burglar breaks into my house and discovers I'm a coke dealer, his crime is forgiven?
Of course not - but if the drug dealer gets off without consequences, then something is amiss.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:51 pm to rumproast
quote:
When did "exposing corruption" become "interfering with an election"??
I think when the fake newsers learned they could get away with it...about the same time Climategate's exposing of fake data and money grubbing, agenda driven "scientists" became "science denial".
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:51 pm to rumproast
Because there was very very little wistle blown. But the timing and means of releasing the email was meant to influence the narrative of the election. Can you not see that fact?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:52 pm to rumproast
quote:When one candidate was corrupt.
When did "exposing corruption" become "interfering with an election"??
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:53 pm to ForeLSU
quote:
So if a burglar breaks into my house and discovers I'm a coke dealer, his crime is forgiven?
I don't understand your analogy. In it which one represents the "truth" or exposing corruption...is it the burglar or the coke dealer?
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:54 pm to ChineseBandit58
It shouldn't be too big of an issue that an outside state hacked and released private emails to influence an election. Of course attempts will be made. We interfere in other countries internal affairs all the time. It should be expected and shame on Podesta and DNC for being ill prepared.
What should be huge news is that a political party intentionally suppressed one candidate in favor of the one they want. That's subversion of democracy from within democracy.
What should be huge news is that a political party intentionally suppressed one candidate in favor of the one they want. That's subversion of democracy from within democracy.
This post was edited on 1/5/17 at 2:55 pm
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:55 pm to rumproast
When the victims are the shittiest people in world history IE "democrats"
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:56 pm to rumproast
When exposing corruption allegedly keeps the "right candidate" from winning the election.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:58 pm to rumproast
I guess when a foreign entity with a long history of committing espionage against the United States exposed the inner workings of one party's campaign and not the other?
You guys aren't actually this daft are you? It benefitted you so you don't care. End the bullshite faux confusion. It is embarrassing.
You guys aren't actually this daft are you? It benefitted you so you don't care. End the bullshite faux confusion. It is embarrassing.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 2:58 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Of course not - but if the drug dealer gets off without consequences, then something is amiss.
The same can be said of the burglar in this hypothetical. It's laughable that so many here ignore that.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:00 pm to CaptainBrannigan
quote:
But the timing and means of releasing the email was meant to influence the narrative of the election
By showing the media colluding with one of the candidates?
You seem to gloss over that part of it.
Posted on 1/5/17 at 3:02 pm to Tigerdev
quote:
I guess when a foreign entity with a long history of committing espionage against the United States exposed the inner workings of one party's campaign and not the other?
So your complaint is there was no one at the RNC stupid enough to give up their password?
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News