- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Unsealed charging document for one of the January 6 insurrectionists
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:29 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:29 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
That's just objectively and factually false
How so?
1
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:31 pm to RollTide1987
Anyone who entered the capital on Jan 6th was an idiot.
Doesn't matter what their intent, doesn't matter if it was legal or not, the only thing that matters is
To the winner go all the spoils.
The people who won hate the people that were at the capital and were looking for any reason to drop the hammer on them. These people willingly threw themselves right into the socialists trap, some of them ran gleefully into it.
Save the crying about what's right and wrong. THEY'RE running the show. Period. End of Chapter and likely end of story.
Doesn't matter what their intent, doesn't matter if it was legal or not, the only thing that matters is
To the winner go all the spoils.
The people who won hate the people that were at the capital and were looking for any reason to drop the hammer on them. These people willingly threw themselves right into the socialists trap, some of them ran gleefully into it.
Save the crying about what's right and wrong. THEY'RE running the show. Period. End of Chapter and likely end of story.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:33 pm to dgnx6
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1)—which makes it a crime to knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do;
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)— which makes it a crime to knowingly, and with intent to impede or
disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or
disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or
official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede,
disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the
orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of
Congress or either House of Congress;
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)— which makes it a crime to knowingly, and with intent to impede or
disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or
disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or
official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede,
disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the
orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of
Congress or either House of Congress;
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:33 pm to David_DJS
quote:
That's not really a legal foundation for imprisoning someone
Right, the legal foundation is that he was trespassing in the United States Capitol Building.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:35 pm to RollTide1987
A clear & present danger to our democracy!!
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:36 pm to RollTide1987
Is this even real? There is no one named Conover in the indictments list.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
I'm sure BLM protesting a Trump victory would have been treated exactly the same way. 
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:39 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1)—which makes it a crime to knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do;
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)— which makes it a crime to knowingly, and with intent to impede or
disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or
disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or
official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede,
disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the
orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of
Congress or either House of Congress;
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.
Okay, so every woman during the womens march did this as well. Including elected officials.
But you dont care about that do you? Just about some dude posting a selfie with a beer can.
But did he knowingly enter and remain in a restricted building. Did someone actually say to him this is a restricted building, leave?
This goes for 1 and 2
Did he utter loud or threatening language? for 2(d)
He broke 2(G) But so did AOC.
Whats the oppropriate punishment for 2(G)
Imo he didnt trespass because he didnt remain on private property after being told to leave.
No if he threatened people, and destroyed property then he broke laws. All the other stuff is just bullshite.
At worse he should get a misdemeanor if he destroyed property.
This post was edited on 12/8/21 at 2:46 pm
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:39 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Is this even real? There is no one named Conover in the indictments list.
It just happened last week. Not sure he's even been arrested yet.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:41 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
It's outrageous that they charged this guy with anything.
If having bad taste in beer was a crime I would vote to convict.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:41 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
I think you might be leaving out a few key details there.
Not really. But thanks!
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:43 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
Right, the legal foundation is that he was trespassing in the United States Capitol Building.
If you're waved into the building by the capitol police, is that trespassing?
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:44 pm to dgnx6
I'd say he knew he wasn't supposed to be there 
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:45 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1)—which makes it a crime to knowingly enter or remain in any restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do;
18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(2)— which makes it a crime to knowingly, and with intent to impede or
disrupt the orderly conduct of Government business or official functions, engage in disorderly or
disruptive conduct in, or within such proximity to, any restricted building or grounds when, or so
that, such conduct, in fact, impedes or disrupts the orderly conduct of Government business or
official functions; or attempts or conspires to do so.
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(D)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly utter loud, threatening, or abusive language, or engage in disorderly or disruptive
conduct, at any place in the Grounds or in any of the Capitol Buildings with the intent to impede,
disrupt, or disturb the orderly conduct of a session of Congress or either House of Congress, or the
orderly conduct in that building of a hearing before, or any deliberations of, a committee of
Congress or either House of Congress;
40 U.S.C. § 5104(e)(2)(G)—which makes it a crime to willfully and knowingly parade, demonstrate, or picket in any of the Capitol Buildings.
Is there a section that mentions all of these statutes are suspended when the Senate is trying to confirm a Supreme Court nominee you don't like? Because every single one of those "laws" were broken by Kavanaugh protesters and I don't remember doe diddley poo being done about it.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:47 pm to Mickey Goldmill
what are you even showing in that picture? That dude isnt wearing the same top.
This post was edited on 12/8/21 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:47 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:
Is there a section that mentions all of these statutes are suspended when the Senate is trying to confirm a Supreme Court nominee you don't like? Because every single one of those "laws" were broken by Kavanaugh protesters and I don't remember doe diddley poo being done about it.
Over 200 people were arrested during the Kavanaugh hearings
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:47 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:The list was updated on 12/6 and I can't find a story or link about this anywhere. You would think the beer joke would get posted around if it was real.
It just happened last week. Not sure he's even been arrested yet.
Looks fake.
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:48 pm to CaptSpaulding
quote:
I mean, he admits to “storming the Capitol” in his own words. But even putting that aside, anyone who saw what was going on that day and though it was totally ok to just waltz on in and join the party is in a completely different class of stupidity. From looking at this guy, I’m not going to say it’s impossible that he really is that stupid of a person, and if that’s the case, I’d suggest his court appointed attorney argue that he is not mentally fit to stand trial.
So by your account all of those people in that Rotunda should be in Solitary? What if the police let them in?
100's of Kavabaw Protestors were Arrested, wonder if they were sent to solitary for a year?.
Like I said before, there are two Teirs of Justice, one for the Progs shock Troops and one for anyone that Supports Donald Trump.
NBC
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:48 pm to dgnx6
quote:
what are you even showing in that picture?
A police line holding back the crowd with ole boy right there in front. You still gonna play the "he didn't know he wasn't supposed to be there" game?
Posted on 12/8/21 at 2:49 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Over 200 people were arrested during the Kavanaugh hearings
Then what happened to them? Honest question, I don't know. What type of sentences did they serve?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News