Started By
Message

re: Trump wants to cancel order for new Air Force One. Why?

Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:38 am to
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34911 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:38 am to
Just listened to Trump live on Fox..."We want Boeing to make a lot of money...but not that much money. I think Boeing is doing a little bit of a number".

I love Trump. I hope he stays clean.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:39 am to
Guy's a horse trader.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3673 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:39 am to
quote:

Boeing is building a brand new 747 Air Force One for future presidents, but costs are out of control, more than $4 billion. Cancel order!


Just post anything--They'll eat it up! Doesn't have to be true.

Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45760 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:40 am to
Just saw Trump on Varney at Fox Business Network. Said we want Boeing to make money, just not that much money.

It's actually $4 billion for TWO planes, not one. Still.... $2 Billion for a plane? I know it's got the latest and greatest protections and electronics, but holy cow!
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:41 am to
quote:

I have no clue what these things cost.



Let's just start at the normal cost of a jet that size. Then we can see what these ducks are trying to charge to modify it.
Posted by Toula
504
Member since Dec 2006
35399 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:42 am to
True or not. Refreshing to have a cost conscious president making decisions with our money.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29168 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:43 am to
quote:

It's actually $4 billion for TWO planes, not one. Still.... $2 Billion for a plane? I know it's got the latest and greatest protections and electronics, but holy cow!


It's actually $1.65 billion for 2 or 3
quote:


The White House has urgently asked for new presidential jumbo jets to replace two Air Force One Boeing 747-200 aircraft that will reach their 30-year life expectancy next year and are becoming harder to keep flying, according to the Air Force.

"The real challenge and the challenge that is forcing us to buy newer aircraft for the president is to overcome the fact that there are heroics going on every day to keep the current aircraft flying and it's becoming way too expensive and way too difficult to do that," said Kevin W. Buckley, program executive officer of mobility programs headquartered at the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center at Wright-Patterson.

Buckley has oversight of replacing the presidential fleet, known in the Air Force as VC-25s, with two and possibly three Boeing 747-8 planes, a larger and more fuel-efficient version of the iconic blue and white jumbo jetliner with a giant American flag painted on its tail. The Air Force says the new four-engine aircraft will take flight with the president aboard in 2024. Wright-Patterson manages the presidential aircraft replacement program.

"Even with the current replacement program, the existing aircraft will get to be around 35 years old, which is up there in jetliner years," Richard Aboulafia, a senior aviation analysis at the Teal Group in Virginia, said in an email.

While the Air Force has kept bombers and aerial tankers flying decades-longer than ever expected -- many more than half a century old -- that's not an option with the presidential fleet, Buckley said.

"We grit our teeth and bear it in the U.S. Air Force," he said. "We can't do that with the presidential air (fleet). They need 100 percent reliability."

Neither the Air Force nor Boeing released cost estimates when requested Monday, but it was reported early this year that the Air Force has budgeted $1.65 billion between 2015 and 2019 for the new Air Force One. The cost of a commercial Boeing 747-8 is nearly $370 million, according to media reports.




Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:43 am to
quote:

So the current Air Force One is a piece of crap that can't make it four years? We can't re-use it?


It's a boeing 747-200. Boeing doesn't produce those anymore, parts are getting harder and harder to come by and more expensive, sucks up a shite ton of gas and requires a lot of more maintenance than a new plane.

The 747-8 will be bigger and longer but will also be much more fuel efficient, have more access to parts that are readily made and will not require as much maintenance as the 200 does.

It's cheaper to get new planes than continue beating down the 200. Trump is being an idiot here.
Posted by tigerpawl
Can't get there from here.
Member since Dec 2003
22302 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Trump to Put Boeing Employees Out of Work
Let the word parsing and corkscrew equivalents begin.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
20274 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:46 am to
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Just listened to Trump live on Fox..."We want Boeing to make a lot of money...but not that much money.





frick that.

When Boeing makes a shite ton of money and as much as it can, we all do well and that means more jobs and more jobs.

Trump really needs to slam the brakes on the false populism here.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Just post anything--They'll eat it up! Doesn't have to be true.


quote:

The Air Force One aircraft that President Obama currently uses are set to retire in a few years' time. Its two almost identical Boeing 747-200 jumbo jets are to be replaced by Boeing 747-8 jumbo jets, costing more than $3bn (£1.94bn). The new aircraft is expected to take off only after 2023


Trump knows business, government doesn't. You really don't think the planes won't have a total cost of four million by the time six years go by?
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51405 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:48 am to
Art of the deal here.

He stated his opening position. Drop the proce if they want a sale.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73444 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:49 am to
quote:

much more fuel efficient
What's the burn rate for both variations? So longer and bigger you say? So does Andrews AFB AF1 hangars need to be rebuilt?

quote:

It's cheaper to get new planes than continue beating down the 200.
Perhaps but do you think we got a good deal on the two in the works?
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
3673 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:52 am to
quote:

True or not. Refreshing to have a cost conscious president making decisions with our money
.

I can see that--just doesn't feel genuine when tweeted about tho. Just feels cheesy.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73444 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:55 am to
quote:

--just doesn't feel genuine when tweeted about tho.
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29168 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Perhaps but do you think we got a good deal on the two in the works?



For the amount of stuff that they have to put in the planes and given who they're for, that's not a terribly high cost.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45760 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:57 am to
quote:

The two planes are approaching the end of their 30-year life cycle and are due to be replaced in 2024.
quote:

Of the 744 B-52s Boeing built between 1952 and 1962, 76 remain in active service. They share bombing duties with the supersonic B-1 and the stealthy B-2, both far younger models, but aren’t going anywhere. The US Air Force Global Strike Command, which maintains the bombers at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana and Minot AFB in North Dakota (with a few at Edwards Air Force Base in California) expects them to keep flying through the 2040s. That’s not a hard ceiling, though, and continued combat success and budgetary factors could keep the B-52 in action until it turns 100 years old.


LINKYou got planes with nuclear bombs flying aroung that are 60 years old. If it's good enough for a nuclear bomb, you'd think a 747 could be managed to get another 10 years or so.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73444 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:57 am to
quote:

For the amount of stuff that they have to put in the planes and given who they're for, that's not a terribly high cost.
You think so? Want to bet that number comes down quite a bit?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 12/6/16 at 8:59 am to
quote:

When Boeing makes a shite ton of money and as much as it can, we all do well and that means more jobs and more jobs.


So you agree with Obama that we should spread the wealth around by taking money from tax payers and giving it to companies?

I suppose you supported the auto bailouts too?
This post was edited on 12/6/16 at 8:59 am
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram