Started By
Message
locked post

the slyest, most hilarious, nauseating, self-serving nugget of OJ parole

Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm
Posted by crescentcity
Member since Feb 2015
1311 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:50 pm

"...I support the jury system"


Every member of the fraternity of people who have committed and gotten away with murder just winked at you, bro
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


"...I support the jury system"

What was it...9 blacks, 2 Hispanics and 1 white?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36089 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:36 pm to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19064 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 6:39 pm to
Didnt he say he had never used a weapon in an altercation with anyone before going to that hotel room during the parole hearing?
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:48 pm to
are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18797 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:54 pm to
quote:

are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?


Alan Dershowitz implied that just last night.

LINK

This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:01 pm
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
8611 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

are you implying predominantly minority juries won't convict people of color ?


You got dam rite
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:57 pm to
Same token, will predominantly white juries let cops who gun down citizens off, or punitively punish black defendants?

There is more legal evidence (published too) to support this than just these other made up beliefs that are mainly rooted in stereotypes and perceptions of black inferiority.

It's just lazy and prejudice in the end
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 pm to
Based off what? Your prejudices ?
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164196 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 7:58 pm to
OJ was retarded, self centered, and an a-hole today. Prison didn't change him at all. I thought they might keep him in jail since he was so defiant and unrepentant today. His attorney was a clown. It was like they didn't prep at all.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

"...I support the jury system"


He has a history of odd comments about juries. I remember him telling Judge Ito that he was "mindful of the mood and the stamina of this jury" to explain why he wasn't going to take the stand.
Posted by CheniereTiger108
Member since Jul 2014
1609 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to
Do you think the predominantly minority jury in OJ's murder case got the decision right?!
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18797 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:07 pm to
I can only speak for myself SS. If I'm on the jury I take my duties extremely seriously, take in the facts and evidence, and assess accordingly.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Do you think the predominantly minority jury in OJ's murder case got the decision right?!
He believes OJ is innocent so...
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:16 pm to
Yes I do.

The prosecution botched something that should have been easy. But they tampered with evidence, DA GETS CHARGED WITH PERJURY, and they were incredibly racist and biased. Too much legal doubt to convict him.

Now do I think he did it? Yes I do, I think he's a guilty scum bag, but the prosecution couldn't in my opinion prove beyond a responsible doubt that he did it. Must acquit
Posted by StrongSafety
Member since Sep 2004
17547 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:16 pm to
Innocent by ruling yes he is
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm to
A black guy that thinks OJ did it, but thinks not guilty is the right vote. Why?








Wait for it.







Racism.
This post was edited on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10230 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:27 pm to
You're correct. And will probably get down voted by people who supposedly love the Constitution.

If I'm honest, I can't rip the intelligence community and Mueller's appearance of a conflict, and somehow defend prosecutorial lack of ethics in the OJ murder trial, or the fairly stiff sentence after the initial offer in the Nevada armed robery.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42633 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:29 pm to
quote:

I think he's a guilty scum bag, but the prosecution couldn't in my opinion prove beyond a responsible doubt that he did it. Must acquit

He was guilty as sin all right.

His guilt was proven beyond any shadow of doubt - far far beyond any reasonable doubt.

This was a case of jury nullification, pure and simple. This jury knew he murdered those two people and just decided to stick it to 'the man' by letting the perp go.

There was absolutely NO DOUBT - none whatsoever - about his guilt. Sure, the prosecution was not perfect, but nothing is. Mostly they were trying to overcome what they knew to be jury bias in favor of letting him go. They knew the mood of the jury and just tried everything they could think of hoping beyond hope that some sense of justice would make it thru their skulls.

But it was certainly not the prosecution's fault that he got away with murder. With that jury, he could have confessed on the stand and they would still have let him go - because, you know, Rodney King.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42633 posts
Posted on 7/20/17 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Innocent by ruling yes he is

Innocence should never ever be inferred by a "not guilty" verdict.

The only exception to that would be if the defendant took the stand and successfully defended himself against all charges. Then, and only then, would I decide = "yea, he was actually innocent of the charge."

But in OJ case, innocence is complete hogwash.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram