re: Susan Rice: US can 'tolerate' nuclear weapons in North Korea

quote:

---

As the regime faces internal threats, they'll have less internal pressure to not launch an attack to unite their people. Keep that in mind.

---

exactly

trying a coup from the inside without the backing of China/US force will just make Kim more paranoid and more volatile

MUCH worse than using bravado in statements

quote:

---

I think it would be really hard to assassinate Kim. we tried for a long time with Hussein, and never accomplished it.

---

Could have told Dennis Rodman to do it last he was over there, or he would not be allowed back into the states ever again. Either Kim dies or Rodman is out. That's a win either way for the American people.

She's such an idiot!

quote:

---

Susan Rice,

---

I think she should go and do missionary services in North Korea

Retired Army General Anthony Tata said on The Story that Rice is incompetent and has zero credibility.

At this point the best outcome is to stop their nuclear proliferation, use them as an example to other evil regimes, while trying to save face on an international level. Unfortunately that means they will have to strike first which will mean possibly millions dying.

This might sound dumb, but if we can prevoke them to strike first then we take steps to protect possibly billions of people, both foreign and American, in the future.

If you kick the can far enough down the road, the road doesn't go on forever and the party ends sooner rather than later.

It is a moral and ethical conundrum, but isn't it our job to protect the future as much as it is to protect today?