Started By
Message

re: Snowden and Putin really throwing it down on us now.

Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:52 pm to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:52 pm to
I dunno bout all this shite, but that russian chick who did the press conference can annex my territory any day

LINK
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

You're telling me in this age of hyper partisonship, not a single person (outside of Snowden) had a dissenting opinion?
Yeah. Some in the Senate were concerned. And, they had their shite hacked in to also. But, hell, even the oversight committees in the Senate weren't getting specifics.

Alas, I'm amused that you have so much confidence in our govt to restrict its power. There are just so many examples out there to indicate we should expect that.
Posted by DanTiger
Somewhere in Luziana
Member since Sep 2004
9480 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

The USSR and the current Russian state are two very different animals.


I agree 100%

quote:

The Russians are clearly a rival power but to consider them outright enemies as if there is no difference between the current Russian state and the Soviet Union is rather simplistic and inaccurate.


It was a very simplistic explanation but it is also a very offtopic discussion. That poster enjoy derailing topics and does it quite frequently. We have stronger ties to China thn we do to Russia and they are not a friend of ours. As I said earlier you can tell who our governments friends and enemies are by contingency war plans and where our ICBMs are tasked with delivering payloads. We don't have one contingency plan in place to invade or attack England. Our entire European war plan revolves around Russia.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16916 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

We don't have one contingency plan in place to invade or attack England. Our entire European war plan revolves around Russia.


Obviously we don't consider Britain a geopolitical threat for a litany of reasons that aren't even worth delving into. But I'll bet in the early 1900's we considered them more of a rival than now, in spite of the very common and close ties we have. Geopolitically, Russia has all the makings of being a more dangerous rival then a Britain or some other NATO country. That doesn't make them enemies or direct threats to American security interests. It's dangerous to characterize them this way and it's typically done by the interventionists to convince typical Americans to view Russia as a dangerous threat when really they are little more than a geopolitical rival.

Posted by DanTiger
Somewhere in Luziana
Member since Sep 2004
9480 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Obviously we don't consider Britain a geopolitical threat for a litany of reasons that aren't even worth delving into. But I'll bet in the early 1900's we considered them more of a rival than now, in spite of the very common and close ties we have. Geopolitically, Russia has all the makings of being a more dangerous rival then a Britain or some other NATO country. That doesn't make them enemies or direct threats to American security interests. It's dangerous to characterize them this way and it's typically done by the interventionists to convince typical Americans to view Russia as a dangerous threat when really they are little more than a geopolitical rival.


They are direct threat just by the very nature of the weaponry the have. If they were not a nuclear power they would be of no consequence. Our NATO allies are nuclear powers but are not presently threats because we have similar interests. We also rule the roost, and we are an empire even though many have trouble admitting it. All world powers that are not under our "umbrella of protection" are considered enemies because they are. I realize this is not a popular view but I assure you it is the view of our government and has been for a very long time. It doesn't matter if you or I consider Russia a threat it only matters if the guy with his finger on the button considers them a threat.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
58560 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

You're telling me in this age of hyper partisonship, not a single person (outside of Snowden) had a dissenting opinion?


Hyper partisanship? When it comes to circumscribing the authority of state action? You've got to be kidding me. The only time any politician uttered a peep about these actions was when they learned that they had been subjects thereof. None of them care when it's just you and me.

Again, you're fully comfortable with actions so long as the government tells you it's for your own good. As I said before, you're in the majority and that's fine. As for me, I'm not a fan.
Posted by Clete Purcel
Jennings, LA
Member since Oct 2013
145 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

I'll give you a better answer. NO ONE is going to change it. I think we are well past the tipping point.

I hate to be so cynical, but I think you're right. To me, the last watchdog was an objective Press, but when it was exposed that the DOJ was spying on the AP Why did the Obama Administration spy on the AP?, and most of the press continued fawning over the Administration, I knew all was lost.

Unchecked power in the hands of any Administration is very dangerous. In the hands of one who wishes to fundamentally transform America, it puts us on a course that is going to be most difficult to correct.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10436 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

You are insufferable. Troll elsewhere!


I take that as a no.

Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10436 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

he USSR and the current Russian state are two very different animals. The Russians are clearly a rival power but to consider them outright enemies as if there is no difference between the current Russian state and the Soviet Union is rather simplistic and inaccurate.


Now YOU are an insufferable troll as well.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 3:33 pm to
Edward Snowden, Putin's Pawn
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16916 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

. I realize this is not a popular view but I assure you it is the view of our government and has been for a very long time. It doesn't matter if you or I consider Russia a threat it only matters if the guy with his finger on the button considers them a threat.


Well who exactly do you believe determines "the view of our government?" Because I think it's safe to say that a tremendous number of officials in our government would characterize them exactly as I have. Geopolitical threat. A potential dangerous threat, but not a current enemy. You can't actually "assure" me any of what you claim you can. That America and NATO has contingency plans against Russia and not fellow NATO members or weaker Eastern European nations does not make them an "enemy." I'm sure there's quite a bit of disagreement across the spectrum of American government institutions on Russia just as there is in academia.

And once again, a "threat" does not equal an enemy.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20877 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:11 pm to
If the state didn't do everything that Snowden says they did, I'd have a problem. The sad part is what he is saying is true.

Obama wanting to make the police state bigger just tells you the direction and destination we're headed in. Snowden didn't make this situation, and if the Russians are holding it over the govt's head, they brought it on themselves.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 5:22 pm
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20877 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Edward Snowden, Obama's truth problem


FIFY

Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34883 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Unchecked power in the hands of any Administration is very dangerous. In the hands of one who wishes to fundamentally transform America, it puts us on a course that is going to be most difficult to correct.


Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34883 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:30 pm to
Sorry for the dp.
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 5:32 pm
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 5:53 pm to
One point about Snowden should have turned himself in....

People are so naive and ignorant if they think Snowden could have successfully blown the whistle using "proper" channels. frick no, the gov't may talk a good game about transparency and honesty but that is complete lip service bullshite. They only want to get Snowden black bagged and stick him in a hole in the middle of nowhere. The number one instinct of the state is self preservation and image maintenance. It doesnt matter how noble it may be, if it makes the gov't uncomfortable, they're putting an end to that shite any way possible. We wouldn't have heard anything at all out of Snowden had he gone through the "proper" channels and gov't would be getting away with more bull shite lol.

quote:

meant to embarrass the United States and he seems to be happily participating.


Theres a difference between embarrassing a gov't as opposed to the citizens of this country.

What's wrong with embarrassing your gov't that's doing shady and wrong shite and calling them the frick out on it? We all feel embarrased when we frick up and do wrong shite. The state is no different.

Embarrassment spurs you to take steps to correct the behavior that led to this and it's needed for the gov't we have today on not just the issues Snowden is concerned about but everything else including the abomination of a fiscal situation we have today.
Posted by Big12fan
Dallas
Member since Nov 2011
5340 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:29 pm to
Justice Scalia said today at the National Press Club that he does not necessarily consider listening to conversations and gathering information a violation of the 4th amendment. He referred to the 4th amendment's "right to privacy" as vague. He goes on to say that the Supreme Court is the least qualified to decide on wire tapping, etc.

Given the danger that its guarded against, the govt gathering the information may be justified in its actions. He says nothing is absolute.

An interesting conversation which included Justice Ginsburg.

Go to 46 minute mark

Posted by wmr
North of Dickson, South of Herman's
Member since Mar 2009
32518 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

I do as well but this is an obvious propaganda piece meant to embarrass the United States and he seems to be happily participating.


If there was no truth to Snowden's allegations, the U.S. would have no reason to be "embarrassed".
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:53 pm to
I wonder, do you have difficulty with the fact that most of this board is openingly siding with our enemy Putin?
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20877 posts
Posted on 4/17/14 at 8:01 pm to
quote:

I wonder, do you have difficulty with the fact that most of this board is openingly siding with our enemy Putin?
When a government's primary interest becomes the surveillance and control of its population, who is the real enemy of its people?

Is Putin the one pulling Obamas puppet strings?
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram