- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poli board attorneys, question about defamation/slander law.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 2:47 pm to FightinTigersDammit
Posted on 2/2/17 at 2:47 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:No shite!
he has to prove that the lie was put forth with actual malice
It sure as hell wasn't put forth to make him look good.
In what realm is "white supremacist" a compliment.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 2:51 pm to bhtigerfan
I would discourage him from pursuing it. Pelosi is a loon, everybody knows that. I don't think he needs the money, and he definitely doesn't need attorneys digging through everything he's ever said or done looking for bs to justify repeatedly calling him a white supremacist. He already won.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 2:59 pm to LSUtoTulaneLaw
As a practical matter no one wants to spend the money, go through the aggravation, and few things are as aggravating as a suit, only to have more people hear the shitty comments about you.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:12 pm to LSUtoTulaneLaw
He won't pursue it because he has everything to lose and nothing to gain.
As I said, discovery would expose and destroy him
As I said, discovery would expose and destroy him
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:19 pm to bhtigerfan
Truth is a defense
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:20 pm to YStar
quote:You apparently don't know shite, so STFU.
He won't pursue it because he has everything to lose and nothing to gain.
As I said, discovery would expose and destroy him
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:22 pm to UHTiger
quote:Once again different retard, what proof do you have that he's a white supremacist besides the fact that he was the editor of a very popular website?
Truth is a defense
We'll patiently wait for your "proof".
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:25 pm to UHTiger
quote:
Truth is a defense
Provide your objective evidence of this Truth.
We'll wait. Again.
Forever.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:28 pm to YStar
quote:
How is it defamation if it has truth?
Have you stopped beating your wife?
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:34 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I love fricking with people in depos. It is one of life's few joys.
I love fricking with hostile or otherwise the other side's attorneys when being deposed.
The look of "oh frick, I shouldn't have gone there" is one of life's great joys.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:52 pm to bhtigerfan
I wonder if there is an attorney on here that took four semesters of tax law that can answer a question I have about employee benefits and deductibility? I don't want to pay unless it's goood, sound legal advice of course.
LuLzErS
LuLzErS
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:54 pm to scrooster
quote:
I love fricking with hostile or otherwise the other side's attorneys when being deposed.
The look of "oh frick, I shouldn't have gone there" is one of life's great joys.
I'm the furthest thing from hostile. I'm as laid back as they come. You can frick with someone and not be "hostile".
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:54 pm to Iowa Golfer
SFP took some tax law classes. Did well too if I recall.
This post was edited on 2/2/17 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 2/2/17 at 3:57 pm to BBONDS25
Thanks, I was joking. I know the answer. I'd probably pay you if I needed the advice, and I already have a tax attorney. Not sure about the other guy based on some stuff he has posted about taxation however. Well, actually I am sure.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 4:03 pm to bhtigerfan
quote:
Can he sue her for defamation/slander
Could...sure.
quote:
would he have a good case?
Nope. Opinion based barb regarding an ideology.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 4:03 pm to BBONDS25
Weird, weird thread last night. I edited my posts and removed myself from it. Something about health insurance and taking away the employer's tax benefit, or making sure the individual was able to receive the same benefit to even the playing field. I pointed some things out. I don't think they liked it. I got told about four semesters of law school. I've been audited twice, and both times owed no additional tax. I suspect you get what you pay for. And sometime in the case of attorneys, where the 90/10 rule applies bigly just as it does in my profession/business, sometimes you pay $450 an hour becuase someone went to Stanford and don't get what you pay for.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 4:04 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
But I don't practice anymore
i did not realize this until a few weeks ago
also, i waited for you in court that day and didn't see you :/
Posted on 2/2/17 at 4:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
Sorry. Should have updated you. Hearing was moved...like always. I'll let you know when we resume.
Posted on 2/2/17 at 4:06 pm to Iowa Golfer
quote:
I pointed some things out. I don't think they liked it.
what?
i just made a comment about special tax treatment of health care plans and linked to the IRS page discussing it
quote:
I got told about four semesters of law school.
yeah i said that to iosh as to why i was leaving the thread. i didn't feel like discussing tax law at 11pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News