- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jay Carney denies memo was even about Benghazi
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:58 pm to Jbird
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:58 pm to Jbird
quote:
Was it the Rs that had to be sued to bring forth an email that you say had nothing to do directly with Libya? If it had nothing to do with it why did these assholes have to be sued? Just admit you are carrying the water for an inept admin and failed intel.
I really have to wonder which WH aide gives him HIS talking points.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 6:59 pm to Godfather1
quote:Makes you wonder.
I really have to wonder which WH aide gives him HIS talking
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:11 pm to Godfather1
quote:
I really have to wonder which WH aide gives him HIS talking points.
You really give me too much credit
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:13 pm to Jbird
quote:
The intelligence that helped inform those talking points—and what the U.S. public would ultimately be told—came in part from an intercept of a phone call between one of the alleged attackers and a middle manager from al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), the group’s north African affiliate, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intercept. In the call, the alleged attacker said the locals went forward with the attack only after watching the riots that same day at the U.S. embassy in Cairo.
NSA looking out for Jbird
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:15 pm to Decatur
Again the same assholes that supplied that information are the same ones who fricking failed. Yet you take everything they say as gospel.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:16 pm to Decatur
quote:
You really give me too much credit
Well, I certainly wouldn't expect you to admit it.
It's just that it's difficult to believe that anyone with any kind of a life at all who doesn't work for the administration, would expend so much time and effort on this board defending it.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:19 pm to Godfather1
There really is no defense anymore. Anyone trying to, is just showing how pathetically devoted they are to a letter D. Used to be a time, either side at least felt they were supporting folks that wanted the best for the U.S. Not anymore.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:20 pm to Jbird
quote:
Again the same assholes that supplied that information are the same ones who fricking failed. Yet you take everything they say as gospel.
This, it will all come out, at least most of it. But there is no doubt the finger is definitely at the White House , now.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:21 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
This, it will all come out, at least most of it. But there is no doubt the finger is definitely at the White House , now.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:23 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Used to be a time, either side at least felt they were supporting folks that wanted the best for the U.S. Not anymore.
This, and it really isn't the failure of protecting our people, whom they said they would on 9/10...Its the dang lies, and cover-up that followed.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:32 pm to Decatur
Facts:
1. A memo came from the White House specifically related to Benghazi, as stated on the memo, requesting a video be used to protect the president's failed policy.
Original Documents
Note Benghazi referenced over and over - right after reference to the VIDEO. This is specifically what she was told to say.
1. A memo came from the White House specifically related to Benghazi, as stated on the memo, requesting a video be used to protect the president's failed policy.
Original Documents
Note Benghazi referenced over and over - right after reference to the VIDEO. This is specifically what she was told to say.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:46 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Facts:
1. A memo came from the White House specifically related to Benghazi, as stated on the memo, requesting a video be used to protect the president's failed policy.
Original Documents
Note Benghazi referenced over and over - right after reference to the VIDEO. This is specifically what she was told to say
The screen cap looks like another set of comms guidance. That's somewhere in the email chain but it was not included with the Rice prep memo. Not sure why this should have been flagged at the time given that Ansar al-Sharia was blaming the "spontaneous popular uprising" as a "response to what happened by the West."
"We also see indications that this action was related to the video"
That's true. They did.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:48 pm to Decatur
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:00 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
Missed the other 113 pages huh?
I said it was somewhere in email chain.
That's not the prep doc tied to the 4 pm prep session with Rice that I have been referring to. Looks like they sent that to her the night before.
Anyway, I don't see a problem with that given the intelligence they had. Ansar al-Sharia was making public statements to the same effect.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:18 pm to Decatur
Cairo and Benghazi had nothing to do with a Video, duh. Just interviewed the Lawyer from the Blind sheik case, and he said Cairo protests were about the Blind Sheik, and they were going for 3 days, prior to 911. It had zero to do with the video. He said White House tweets made it look like it was from the video. This is one huge cover-up, as we expected. As well as the orchestrated commercials in Pakistan about the video....
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:35 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Cairo and Benghazi had nothing to do with a Video, duh. Just interviewed the Lawyer from the Blind sheik case, and he said Cairo protests were about the Blind Sheik, and they were going for 3 days, prior to 911. It had zero to do with the video.
Maybe their group was protesting about the blind sheik but a great many there were protesting about the video. As I said, there is evidence that al-qaeda types were present protesting with their own grievances.
quote:
He said White House tweets made it look like it was from the video.
Every news organization in the world was reporting that those protests were about the video. If the guys in Benghazi were watching this on tv (and we have intel that they were) then the explanation given to them over the tv would have likely involved the video.
You'd have to pretty much assume a world-wide media conspiracy led by the White House if you want to go down that path.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:37 pm to Decatur
quote:Fed by the White House.
Every news organization in the world was reporting that those protests were about the video
quote:Right.
You'd have to pretty much assume a world-wide media conspiracy led by the White House if you want to go down that path.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:44 pm to a want
So what would change your mind? Just be honest and say if itt were a GOP white house it would be plenty enough evidence . For people who claim their so smart you liberals are either extremely stupid or fricking liars I'm pretty sure it's #2..
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:50 pm to Decatur
quote:
Maybe their group was protesting about the blind sheik but a great many there were protesting about the video. As I said, there is evidence that al-qaeda types were present protesting with their own grievances.
I'm just saying what he said. Sounded like he was saying there was a Cairo cover-up before the Benghazi cover-up. Said they were using the video excuse to cover-up Al queda's protest induced acts in Cairo, over the Sheik, then just found it was convienant , so they kept it going to cover Benghazi. Said he was there, so who knows...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News