- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Trump loses EO fight, the blowback will be tremendous
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:34 am to TJGator1215
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:34 am to TJGator1215
quote:
Gtfo with the fear tactics. The judge was put there by a Republican president.
So was David Souter
0
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:37 am to Champagne
You do realize that both parties are authoritarian and want big government? You can't be this dumb can You??
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:41 am to TJGator1215
The amount of shitty "well the Left was classless so let me hurl some insults" on this board is crazy. "The other side did it" isn't a valid argument.
Also still waiting on anyone to break down why a TRO wasn't warranted here.
Also still waiting on anyone to break down why a TRO wasn't warranted here.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:46 am to udtiger
Sounds nice and Nixonian. Probably ends the sane way. 
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:48 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
pathetic that you're more interested in some kind of partisan revenge than you are the country.
You mean like Valorie Jarrett's comment from 4 years or so ago stating we will revenge ourselves on our enemies.
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:50 am to udtiger
quote:
unelected judges
We dislike unelected judges, right?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:52 am to LSUTANGERINE
Not exactly related to the present conversation, but judicial elections are fricking terrible
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:54 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
pathetic that you're more interested in some kind of partisan revenge than you are the country.
How does Trump losing this and more terrorist being let in help our country?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:55 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Yeah I'm not going through my entire post history just to placate your unhinged delusions. If you want to go look, be my guest. I'm sure someone like SFP could vouch for it as well.
Delusions? You mean like to ones you are having about you actually publicly disagreeing with the Kenyan Messiah?
Didn't happen! At least not in this forum.
Has anyone here ever seen a post from Drac that actually disagreed with Obama?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:56 am to CorporateTiger
quote:
Not exactly related to the present conversation, but judicial elections are fricking terrible
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:56 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Yeah I'm not going through my entire post history just to placate your unhinged delusions
Posted on 2/5/17 at 9:59 am to ForeLSU
quote:
You don't understand, as OP states, people are scared out of their minds right now about the millions of bad dudes flooding into the country to kill us. We MUST let Trump do whatever it takes to save us. He alone as the ability to save us
What is your reason for wanting them in?
See Europe for my reason for not wanting them.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:01 am to CorporateTiger
LINK
Here's a link to the order since you evidently haven't read it.
1). The President is allowed to make restrictions to Immigration policy. That passage has been cited plenty of times here and other places so you should be familiar.
2). The main argument that the judge makes is that business, education, freedom of movement and family relations are harmed by restricting immigration (presumably just in this case). That argument could extend to every immigration restriction the President enacted. Such an argument, if accepted, would effectively make any immigration restriction null.
Federal judges have been halving the immigration baby for decades. They're eventually going to be twisted into knots. As they are here.
Here's a link to the order since you evidently haven't read it.
1). The President is allowed to make restrictions to Immigration policy. That passage has been cited plenty of times here and other places so you should be familiar.
2). The main argument that the judge makes is that business, education, freedom of movement and family relations are harmed by restricting immigration (presumably just in this case). That argument could extend to every immigration restriction the President enacted. Such an argument, if accepted, would effectively make any immigration restriction null.
Federal judges have been halving the immigration baby for decades. They're eventually going to be twisted into knots. As they are here.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:03 am to ForeLSU
quote:
You don't understand, as OP states, people are scared out of their minds right now about the millions of bad dudes flooding into the country to kill us. We MUST let Trump do whatever it takes to save us. He alone as the ability to save us.
And the left is losing their mind at halting immigration from a few countries for 3 months while we examine our processes. Is there a sane side in this debate? Early signs point to no.
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 10:04 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:09 am to CorporateTiger
I haven't read it..but who was filing for the TRO and what irreparable harm would they suffer if the order wasn't issued?
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:12 am to novabill
quote:
What is your reason for wanting them in?
My point has nothing to do with wanting, or not wanting, "them" in. Our biggest threat right now, IMO, is the growing percentage who are willing to let a wannabe authoritarian (and his 2 lunatic advisors) go unchecked in the name of "safety".
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:13 am to ForeLSU
quote:
Our biggest threat right now, IMO, is the growing percentage who are willing to let a wannabe authoritarian (and his 2 lunatic advisors) go unchecked in the name of "safety"
That's one of them.
The second is people who want to declare any action by a President unconstitutional because they don't like the President.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:13 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Yeah I'm not going through my entire post history just to placate your unhinged delusions.
Convenient.
You're just going full Rex now. You should never go full Rex.
This post was edited on 2/5/17 at 10:17 am
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:14 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
just do whatever he wants.
Unless it's a democrat and it hits the right feels, you mean.
Posted on 2/5/17 at 10:16 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
pathetic that you're more interested in some kind of partisan revenge than you are the country.
Don't even try to pull that.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News