Started By
Message
locked post

If Republicans Don't Go Nuclear For Gorsuch, I'm Never Voting For Them Again

Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:07 pm
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45285 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:07 pm
Because there is no point in voting for a republican at that stage.

If they are so spineless, weak, and ineffective that they can't stand up, tell the Democrats to frick themselves, and get a preeminently qualified justice like Gorsuch approved, I'm done with them forever. Because there is no point for their existence. They will have become totally useless.

And I know I'm not the only one that will have had enough of them.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:09 pm to
I don't see a logical, non-partisan reason why Democrats want to filibuster this. Gorsuch is a great choice and he is replacing Scalia, not Ginsburg.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:10 pm to
agree, unless it's Rand
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
28123 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

unless


Posted by Spaulding Smails
Milano’s Bar
Member since Jun 2012
18805 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:11 pm to
So who will you vote for going forward? Democrats? Third party?

Or will you just not vote?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67488 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:13 pm to
Relax.....Mitch has this
Posted by airfernando
Member since Oct 2015
15248 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:18 pm to
are you saying you won't vote for any republican or just not for a republican senate?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146904 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:20 pm to
they may be saving the nuke for the next 3 SCOTUS appointments.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:20 pm to
What? He may still be in a primary to vote for
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22030 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

saving the nuke


What does that even mean?

You're either willing to do it or not. The current circumstances, which pretty overwhelmingly favor the Republicans (conservative replacement for a conservative justice) have caused the Dems to bring it to the brink with a filibuster. They're the ones responsible for the use of the nuclear option in my mind, not the Republicans.

The nuclear option seems like a rational response to their antics. Yes, they stalled on Garland which gives a modicum of talking point ammo to the Dems. But Republicans held a majority, they were elected to rule the chamber at the time. That doesn't undo the good faith they displayed by not filibustering Obama's other picks which were predictably left leaning.
Posted by BigD13
French Settlement La
Member since Sep 2013
2513 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:28 pm to
That's the problem we face. Both parties are shite
Posted by PaperTiger
Ruston, LA
Member since Feb 2015
22942 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:30 pm to
It's a slippery slope.

Even though he is qualified, I don't want the Dems to be able to do it with a terrible nominee down the road
Posted by claremontrich
Member since Nov 2016
2001 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:30 pm to
quote:


If Republicans Don't Go Nuclear For Gorsuch, I'm Never Voting For Them Again
they may be saving the nuke for the next 3 SCOTUS appointments.




We should hope the nuclear option gets used THIS TIME for Gorsuch.
This way, all of the filibuster antics and cloture votes and the nuclear option logistics are already done so IF Ginsberg or breyer or kennedy quits or dies, the Republicans can replace them with David Duke if they wanted within 2 weeks and the dems can do nothing about it.

Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The nuclear option seems like a rational response to their antics.


I agree, and I am assuming that has to be expected from Democrats. I am sure there is an aim in bringing about that situation, I just am not seeing what that is in forcing GOP to use that option.

I think Gorsuch should be approved, and differ from my party on this issue.
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
27609 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

the Republicans can replace them with David Duke if they wanted within 2 weeks and the dems can do nothing about it.



Well that escalated quickly.
Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3112 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:36 pm to
Both parties only care about themselves and not for the people they represent
Posted by 91TIGER
Lafayette
Member since Aug 2006
17717 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Even though he is qualified, I don't want the Dems to be able to do it with a terrible nominee down the road





See, that's where you are fooling yourself. The democrats are dirty bastards who have no rules. They will do whatever it takes to ram their backward arse ideology down your throat. If they get the chance they'll damn well use it every time. frick them, it's time to push thru as much as possible before these sick fricks get back in power.
Posted by zeebo
Hammond
Member since Jan 2008
5194 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:37 pm to
The Dems are going to go nuke next time they can anyway. Let's do it now.
Posted by CorporateTiger
Member since Aug 2014
10700 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 1:38 pm to
Tactically I don't see why Dems are going to have this battle over Gorsuch.

If RBG (or one of the other liberals) dies, that would be the best time to force the Republicans to go nuclear. Also a decent chance Trump nominates someone more objectionable than Gorsuch there.

That is all just looking at the objective tactics here. I don't see how Republicans will look particularly bad going nuclear here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram