Started By
Message

re: Frick You Bill De Blasio.You are Fricking toast. Liberal Shitebag.

Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:04 am to
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19280 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:04 am to
The police were responding to calls from the area stores about Gardner's activities. N.Y has one of the highest taxes on cigarettes in the country & individuals selling individual cigarettes is a huge problem for stores that sell them. The store owners in the area had pointed him out specifically as an habitual offender & he was known to be extremely verbally abusive to store owners. He was not arbitrarily picked out by NYPD to harass. As the new shirts state: "breathe easy, don't break the law".
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:07 am to
quote:

The police were responding to calls from the area stores about Gardner's activities


Do you have a link to something supporting that that isn't attributed to NYPD statements? Everything I've seen says the police were responding to call about a fight, a fight Garner allegedly helped break up, and a fight where the participants fled the scene as police started arriving.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Any one of those cops would sell his firstborn to have that day back, I guarantee.

It's good that they feel this way. But it's of limited value. For comparison, a person who commits vehicular homicide while intoxicated will often also wish they could take it back. That doesn't change the nature of their actions. I'm not directly comparing the two, just pointing out that post event remorse isn't all that impressive.

And the post event remorse becomes really inconsequential when you have all the police apologists showing up to tell us all how Garner got what he deserved. We even have cop apologists telling us Tamir Rice got what he had coming to him.
quote:

fanning the flames

Does rhetoric from the police or their unions count as fanning the flames of animus? Or does that just go one way?
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78464 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:11 am to
quote:

what was he being arrested for?


He was being arrested because he was being accused of breaking a law and resisted arrest. Whether he actually was breaking a law would have been up to judge and jury, because America...

That law was instituted to PROTECT State and City Taxation collection, was originated by Democrats, and pushed and promoted by The Democratic Party. You and your trial lawyer buddies are the guys who gave us 80 cent loosies. Don't bitch about it now . If you have hundreds of unnecessary laws, there will be more lawbreakers.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Either you don't understand the term parsing, or you haven't read my posts.

Your posts about chest compression are spot on in the links you provided.

I don't want to conflate your statements with other's ITT so I'll have to review before I say anything else.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

He was being arrested because he was being accused of breaking a law


I get that's what the NYPD are saying, but the facts in the video don't really support that. I've searched a few times to see if they found any cigarettes on him, but haven't been able to find anything. I'm just trying to figure out why they started harassing him.

My guess is they suspected of him breaking the law based on their knowing him and knowing of his past, recent transgressions. I don't know if that warrants probable cause though.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111507 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:17 am to
quote:

That law was instituted to PROTECT State and City Taxation collection, was originated by Democrats, and pushed and promoted by The Democratic Party. You and your trial lawyer buddies are the guys who gave us 80 cent loosies. Don't bitch about it now .


I'm Republican. I will continue to bitch.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78464 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:18 am to
quote:

It's good that they feel this way. But it's of limited value. For comparison, a person who commits vehicular homicide while intoxicated will often also wish they could take it back. That doesn't change the nature of their actions. I'm not directly comparing the two, just pointing out that post event remorse isn't all that impressive.
I agree.

quote:

And the post event remorse becomes really inconsequential when you have all the police apologists showing up to tell us all how Garner got what he deserved


Here is where you are dishonest and go off the rails. They don't think he "deserved" it. THEY THINK HE GOT WHAT THE LAW PRESCRIBES (obviously talking about arrest and not death). Surely you know the difference. And it's law that has the OVERWHELMING support of the same Democrats that are all aflutter.

quote:

Does rhetoric from the police or their unions count as fanning the flames of animus? Or does that just go one way?


When thousands of pro-cop demonstrators take to burning businesses, assaulting and killing people in the streets, we will talk.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 11:22 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35385 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

It looked excessive to about 97% of people that saw it. Of that there is NO doubt.

But let's not slam a guy for introducing the facts of that video. You can decide whether you think it is excessive force or not and I will join you, but let's not debate fact.
Did I say anything non-factual? He tried to say "I can't breathe" before the chokehold was released but could only get out "I can't..." followed by some gargling noises. What isn't factual about that?
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32095 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:54 am to
Well, I guess this is one public sector union whose support the republicans can depend on in 2016.
Posted by FourthQuarter
Member since Sep 2014
2228 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 11:58 am to
This thread is insane. How anyone could type up the OP is beyond me. The NYPD is out of control.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

. THEY THINK HE GOT WHAT THE LAW PRESCRIBES


Well, the law has gone too far. Perhaps everyone should take a step back and consider that instead of just mindlessly bleating what the law says.
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

When thousands of pro-cop demonstrators take to burning businesses, assaulting and killing people in the streets, we will talk.
Which businesses were burned in NYC?

The protests in New York were overwhelmingly orderly and non-violent. The only serious incident I remember hearing about was when two officers tried to arrest the guy who threw the trash can and several people intervened and assaulted the officers in the process. But considering that tens of thousands of protesters marched on multiple dates over the span of several weeks, I'd say the NYC protesters, as a whole, did a pretty good job of being peaceful.

edit: to be clear, I don't count the cop-killer as part of the protesters, even if he was motivated by the Brown/Garner cases. He did not act as part of the organized protests and his actions should not reflect on the protesters who were overwhelmingly peaceful
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:04 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

When thousands of pro-cop demonstrators take to burning businesses, assaulting and killing people in the streets, we will talk.


WTF are you talking about?
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

The NYPD is out of control.
I don't think it's out of control in general, but Pat Lynch and the police union are definitely out of control and insane.

I have a lot of respect for the NYPD as a whole. I think that they do a pretty good job, even if they make mistakes sometimes. I do think that the officers who make serious mistakes should be held accountable, and that's one thing the NYPD could do better--holding itself accountable when it makes mistakes.
Posted by FourthQuarter
Member since Sep 2014
2228 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:28 pm to
Yes, it's the union that is out of control.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:29 pm
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57198 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

Why were they arresting him for such a relatively minor offense? Why not issue him a summons?



This wasn't Mr. Garner's first rodeo. He was rather well known by local law enforcement and had a rather lengthy rap sheet.
Posted by Volmanac
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2009
7733 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:21 pm to
What does his rap sheet include?
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78464 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:25 pm to
Oh now you went and did it.
Posted by genuineLSUtiger
Nashville
Member since Sep 2005
72926 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

What does his rap sheet include?


Selling tshirts without an official trademark on them. He just got tazed for that.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram