- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bill Nye beatdown.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:12 pm to Geauxgurt
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:12 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
that is exactly why we are where we are in this debate
We're in this debate because al gore took credit for it. It should have never been politicized I don't understand it. Every year more and more people switch over to "we know the earth is warming dumbass we just don't know why" while sitting next to someone on their side that posts pictures of snow to prove the earth isn't warming. If there was a consensus among pretty much any other scientific community the general public would agree with it, but since this has become a left and right thing there's an issue. Surely you as a scientist sees the difference.
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:14 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Then don't defend yourself coming back to another Nye thread after yesterday.
but I will never defend ignorance.
But the challenge still stands:
Please provide a Nye quote incorporating the term "ice age" from that interview that does not include scientifically false information.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:15 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Then don't defend yourself coming back to another Nye thread after yesterday.
I'm happy to put your arse in place again in this thread if you'd like.
quote:
But the challenge still stands:
No it doesn't. It didn't "stand" in that thread and it doesn't "stand" in this thread.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:25 pm to dragginass
I like Bill Nye.
I think Bill Nye had a great show and exposed a lot of people to the scientific method and basic scientific facts and made it "fun" for kids.
However, Bill Nye has a mechanical engineering background. I am a mechanical engineer with the same background and I also went and pursued a Masters in the field.
I can say, without a doubt, I have learned nothing about climatology in any of my classes, at any of my jobs, or in any of my research. Neither has any of my colleagues.
Bill Nye is not an expert in the field and is no more qualified to speak about it than a veterinarian or computer software developer.
I think Bill Nye had a great show and exposed a lot of people to the scientific method and basic scientific facts and made it "fun" for kids.
However, Bill Nye has a mechanical engineering background. I am a mechanical engineer with the same background and I also went and pursued a Masters in the field.
I can say, without a doubt, I have learned nothing about climatology in any of my classes, at any of my jobs, or in any of my research. Neither has any of my colleagues.
Bill Nye is not an expert in the field and is no more qualified to speak about it than a veterinarian or computer software developer.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:25 pm to olddawg26
quote:Science is not a poll conducted enterprise. Politics is.
If there was a consensus among pretty much any other scientific community
In terms of questions Tucker was asking, there is no ""consensus"" I'm aware of.
But as has been suggested, the question for warmists is what should be done even is every bit of hysteria is justified?
China and India and other rapidly developing, carbon emitting economies are not going away. What should be done?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:30 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Okay, here it sits.
No it doesn't. It didn't "stand" in that thread and it doesn't "stand" in this thread.
Please provide a Nye quote incorporating the term "ice age" from that interview that does not include scientifically false information.
Take your time.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:35 pm to NC_Tigah
That isn't necessary for anything I've said.
You should wait for it, though.
You should wait for it, though.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:42 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
.the last time the earth was 400ppm the oceans were 5 to 40 mtrs higher...those changes are going to happen now. New York City, New Orleans...gone.
that is going to happen, period
If you have the data to make this prediction then you have the data to give some estimated date. So when will this happen? Next year? Ten years from now? Thirty?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:46 pm to NC_Tigah
Not only is China spending hundreds of billions of dollars for clean energy, they have almost 1.5 BILLION people. To use them putting out more CO2 than us as a talking point is pretty dumb. India has plans to get 60% of their electricity from non fossil fuels in the next decade. Everyone realizes what is going on and making the correct steps to correct the issue, except this board where it's funny when a guy says he burned tires all day or just lets his car sit in neutral cause he "prefers warm weather".
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:47 pm to Ross
quote:
Bill Nye is not an expert in the field and is no more qualified to speak about it than a veterinarian or computer software developer.
Would you agree that's why tuck tuck had him on? And how I'm willing to bet the farm that he would never have an actual climatologist on?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:52 pm to olddawg26
quote:More CO2 than us?
To use them putting out more CO2 than us as a talking point is pretty dumb
We are a developed economy. China and India are not.
So again, as they continue to develop, WTF is the CO2 reduction proposal?
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:54 pm to olddawg26
quote:You've been duped.
Not only is China spending hundreds of billions of dollars for clean energy
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:55 pm to NC_Tigah
No, he's right. China's investment in renewable energy is pretty immense.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:57 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You've been duped.
Ah yes, when in doubt, fake news.
Posted on 3/1/17 at 1:59 pm to nvasil1
quote:
I thought that was the whole bit. Basically, I'm going to talk over you and dismiss everything you're attempting to say. Now how does that feel?
sounds professional
Posted on 3/1/17 at 2:33 pm to olddawg26
quote:China has no intention of disadvantaging itself economically to reduce carbon output. Zero!
Ah yes, when in doubt, fake news.
There are major issues driving China's "Carbon Policy" none of which has the least to do with altruistic desire to "save the planet".
(1) China has limited fossil fuel resources (ffr)
(2) 2° to #1, China is in constant pursuit of alternative energy sources, e.g., hydro, solar
(3) Coal represents a very large % of what FFRs China does possess.
(4) Chinese coal burns dirty (see #5)
(5) For 3 decades China took far more interest in fast energy production, than clean energy production. As a result, it's cities are massively polluted. Residents are unhappy about it. There is pressure on Xi to reduce urban smog. Were it not for that, China would continue as is, indefinitely.
(6) If by participating in "Climate Conferences", China can convince developed countries to disadvantage themselves, therefore allowing China to close the gap, it will do anything to achieve that end.
You've been duped.
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 3/1/17 at 5:30 pm to olddawg26
quote:
quote:
Bill Nye is not an expert in the field and is no more qualified to speak about it than a veterinarian or computer software developer.
Would you agree that's why tuck tuck had him on? And how I'm willing to bet the farm that he would never have an actual climatologist on?
I think Tuck had him on because Nye is a fake scientist who spouts off about liberal viewpoints like he's an expert on climate change, abortion, etc. and he needs to be exposed as the clown that he is.
Id like to hear a knowledgeable debate on it, but neither Tuck or Nye should be anywhere near it.
This post was edited on 3/1/17 at 5:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News