As it turns out, no, those four methods are not abortifacient

The contraceptives Hobby Lobby objected to prevent pregnancies by preventing ovulation or by obstructing an egg from being fertilized. According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists “there is no scienti?c evidence that emergency contraceptives available in the United States and approved by the FDA affect an existing pregnancy.”

Now, here's what Samuel Alito wrote in his majority opinion in the Hobby Lobby case:

quote:

---

“The owners of the businesses have religious objections to abortion, and according to their religious beliefs the four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients. If the owners comply with the [Obama administration’s contraception] mandate, they believe they will be facilitating abortions..."

---

So, what's the danger here? Hobby Lobby could have believed, instead, that the pills would cause pigs to fly out of Scalia's fat butt, and that they have a religious objection to pigs generated from the assholes of assholes, and Alito's logic would not need to be reworked in any way. Even when science tells us that a religious belief is FLAT OUT WRONG it must be respected above compelling state interest, according to this asinine and crooked Supreme Court.