Started By
Message
locked post

Article detailing how this all could end...

Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:00 pm
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:00 pm
I am posting an article that will sum up where this all could lead written by Robert Barnes of LawNewz-a Dan Abrams site.

Feel free to read it.

Cliff-notes be damned as there are too many points made in this article that clarify possibly all your questions and I'd bungle it up.

LINK /

So, hopefully you take the time to read it. You will glad you did.
This post was edited on 3/5/17 at 12:08 pm
Posted by tigersandsaints
Member since Dec 2005
6321 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:03 pm to
Seriously, you can't even link the article?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69250 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:03 pm to
Are you kidding me right now?
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:04 pm to
Sad, or bad, post
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134843 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:05 pm to
You're not good at posting
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20478 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:05 pm to
This is a terrible post. Can't even link?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71071 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

HailHailtoMichigan!


Are you really the one to be calling anyone out for a shitty thread?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69250 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:07 pm to
frick yourself.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28536 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:08 pm to
I am posting a response to the article. It will be a good response and I hope you take the time to read it.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71071 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:09 pm to
Melt.

Sorry I missed last night.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69250 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:13 pm to
Grow punkbitch
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
23710 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:13 pm to
I read the article unlike you liberal shills. Obama may just have stepped in it this time.

They have made one major mistake. They are going after someone that hits back.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
71071 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Grow punkbitch


Yeah.
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:16 pm to
Look, I'm new at this shite, so live with it until I adjust. I'll get there. I recognize it is a different form of communication and I'll take the punches as they come lol.



Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:16 pm to
A tap under a FISA warrant wouldn't be illegal- it would explicitly be legal hence the "warrant" part.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146549 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

That raises the third problem: it seems the FISA-compelled protocols for precluding the dissemination of the information were violated, and that Obama’s team issued orders to achieve precisely what the law forbids, if published reports are true about the administration sharing the surveilled information far-and-wide to promote unlawful leaks to the press. This, too, would be its own crime, as it brings back the ghost of Hillary’s emails — by definition, FISA information is strictly confidential or it’s information that never should have been gathered. FISA strictly segregates its surveilled information into two categories: highly confidential information of the most serious of crimes involving foreign acts of war; or, if not that, then information that should never have been gathered, should be immediately deleted, and never sourced nor disseminated. It cannot be both.

Democrats seem to think Obama ordered this as POTUS so it is untouchable and warranted...

The best part is the last paragraph. It is on record that Obama ordered her OFF as, successor-to-Sessions. Why?

quote:

Democrats may regret Sessions’ recusal, as his replacement is a mini-Sessions: a long-respected, a-political, highly ethical prosecutor, Dana Boente, whose reputation is well-warranted from his service at the Tax Division, and who won’t be limited by any perceived ties to Trump, given his prior appointment by Obama. Obama himself appeared scared of Boente, as he removed Boente from the successor-to-Sessions position during the lame-duck part of Obama’s presidency, but Trump restored Boente to that role earlier this month. Democrats may get the investigation they wanted, but it may be their own that end up named in the indictment.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
33983 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

A tap under a FISA warrant wouldn't be illegal- it would explicitly be legal hence the "warrant" part.



That's not what the Article stated...nice try
Posted by makersmark1
earth
Member since Oct 2011
15746 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:22 pm to
Well written, objective article.
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:28 pm to
You serious?

quote:

A tap under a FISA warrant wouldn't be illegal- it would explicitly be legal hence the "warrant" part.



If there are any recordings that don't fall in line with what the FISA court allows and not destroyed; leaked to the media or other intelligence agencies than shite will be going down. Period.
Posted by reo45
Member since Nov 2015
6362 posts
Posted on 3/5/17 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

cajunangelle


Excellent points.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram