Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

ENGSTER: Last five years the best ever for LSU football

Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:21 pm
Posted by blackjackjackson
fourth dimension
Member since May 2008
7674 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:21 pm
Partial column for more:LINK

quote:

By JIM ENGSTER
Tiger Rag President

The 31-28 Music City Bowl defeat to Notre Dame on Dec. 30 drops the record of Les Miles in his last 40 games at LSU to 28-12 (70 percent). His previous 40 games at Tiger Town produced a mark of 34-6 (85 percent), so there are skeptics who insist the LSU program is on the decline.

It is more prudent to examine the football program in five-year increments rather than 40-game cycles. When the five-year barometer is used for inspection of fitness, the last five seasons are on the record the most successful in modern times at LSU.

Years Overall Record SEC Record Coaches

2010-14 52-14 29-11 Les Miles

2005-09 51-15 27-13 Les Miles

2000-04 48-16 28-12 Nick Saban

1995-99 33-24-1 19-20-1 Gerry DiNardo/Hal Hunter

1990-94 21-34 12-26 Mike Archer/Curley Hallman

1985-89 40-17-2 22-9-0 Bill Arnsparger/Mike Archer

1980-84 30-24-2 13-14-3 Jerry Stovall/Bill Arnsparger

1975-79 35-22-1 14-16 Charles McClendon

1970-74 41-16-2 19-9-1 Charles McClendon

1965-69 40-14-2 14-11-1 Charles McClendon

1960-64 39-12-3 21-8-2 Paul Dietzel/Charles McClendon

1955-59 31-19-2 18-13-1 Paul Dietzel

Since the start of the 2010 season, LSU boasts a 78.8 percent overall winning percentage with a 72.5 percent success rate in Southeastern Conference play. It is a better record than any five-year clip preceding the current one.

The quandary for Miles is that the past five campaigns did not produce a national title. Because of no NCAA glory, Miles is measured by the first five years of his tenure and the five years of Nick Saban from 2000 to 2004. Those periods were highlighted by the BCS championships of 2003 and 2007.

With five years remaining on his contract, Miles must capture at least one national title in the next five seasons. If LSU does not win it all at least once between now and the close of the 2019 season, the last decade of Miles will be gauged by the lack of national titles no matter what his record shows.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 9:47 pm
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
75219 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:23 pm to
I prefer 2003-2007
Posted by ItsThatDude12
Giving out Mercy Knees
Member since Apr 2009
9927 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:23 pm to
1/4 in the last four bowl games so there's that.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 9:24 pm
Posted by bearhc
Member since Sep 2009
4939 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:25 pm to
How about 1969-1973
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63053 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

The quandary for Miles is that the past five campaigns did not produce a national title. Because of no NCAA glory, Miles is measured by the first five years of his tenure and the five years of Nick Saban from 2000 to 2004. Those periods were highlighted by the BCS championships of 2003 and 2007.



This is spot on.
Posted by chilge1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2009
12137 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:30 pm to
2006, 2011, and 2013 SHOULD have produced a title IMO
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11875 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:35 pm to
Well... one guy built the program... very similar to what's happening at alabama....
one of them just didn't screw it up until now.
Posted by WalkingTurtles
Alexandria
Member since Jan 2013
5913 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:36 pm to
I appreciate the man and the money his foundation gives and will give to my family for scholarships and other athletes' families for education..........but Charlie Mac was so average. He's the Marvin Lewis of LSU, longevity, more wins than losses, but nothing of note won or attained.
Posted by Football_Freak
Member since May 2012
2410 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:37 pm to
horrible analysis
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

It is more prudent to examine the football program in five-year increments rather than 40-game cycles.



Why exactly is that more prudent?

Because otherwise there'd be no article.

The author makes about as much sense as calling 2013 a "record breaking" offensive year for LSU. It's just creative accounting by juxtaposing whatever you need to in order to make some pollyanna point. LSU was 9-4 in 2009 versus 8-5 in 2014, which automatically makes 2009-2013 a better five year period than 2010-2014.


Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52617 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:44 pm to
This guy sounds like the admins.. Trying to hard to look for positives when there aren't any
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63053 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Why exactly is that more prudent?


Because he's had exactly two of them, has one more in theory, and it matches the tenure of Saban. If it made him look bad, you'd be OK with it.

The same people who find it stupid to dissect his tenure are the same ones who really love the seven year review, coincidentally starting the year after his national championship.
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

the last five seasons are on the record the most successful in modern times at LSU. 

Only if you count back in 5 year increments. As someone else said 2003-2007. Off the top of my head, we were what 55-11. 2 SEC and BCS titles. 3 BCS wins, and 3 trips to Atlanta.
Posted by TG
Metairie
Member since Sep 2004
3059 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

The quandary for Miles is that the past five campaigns did not produce a national title.


What about SEC titles? Since the BCS debacle, LSU hasn't even won the SEC West...
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11875 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

What about SEC titles? Since the BCS debacle, LSU hasn't even won the SEC West...
For shame.
Posted by Srbtiger06
Member since Apr 2006
28262 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

I prefer 2003-2007



Same here.

That being said, if we would have won on 1/9 then the recent run would blow it out.

2011 was the most dominant and talented team I've ever seen on the college level. Talent out the arse and the performances (except for one game) to back it up. It still blows my mind how nasty we were that year.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram