- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Social "Conservatives" = Economic Socialists
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:01 pm
True or false?
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:02 pm to Volmanac
Truth.
ETA: Rick Santorum is a good example of this btw.
ETA: Rick Santorum is a good example of this btw.
This post was edited on 6/23/14 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:08 pm to Volmanac
False- How people want to organize themselves economically through both liberty and order is a reflection as much of culture then on some sort of materialistic rationalism.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:10 pm to OleWar
quote:
False- How people want to organize themselves economically through both liberty and order is a reflection as much of culture then on some sort of materialistic rationalism.
Difference is, what Ron Paul said makes sense, what you said is gobbeldygook.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:13 pm to The Calvin
quote:
Sigh
What's wrong with his question?
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:13 pm to Jagd Tiger
Tell me what your reading level is and maybe I can make it more clear.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:20 pm to Volmanac
Ron Paul would have made a great President.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:23 pm to deltaland
quote:
Ron Paul would have made a great President.
It'll take another decade or so, but history will look back very kindly on him. One of the few who could pierce the bullshite.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:47 pm to Volmanac
That is as accurate as a statement can be.
Social conservatives do not desire less government, they merely desire the government to enforce the values and behaviors which they deem acceptable. In practice, though not in principle, they are no different from what they accuse social/economic liberals of beings.
Social conservatives do not desire less government, they merely desire the government to enforce the values and behaviors which they deem acceptable. In practice, though not in principle, they are no different from what they accuse social/economic liberals of beings.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:48 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Social conservatives do not desire less government, they merely desire the government to enforce the values and behaviors which they deem acceptable. In practice, though not in principle, they are no different from what they accuse social/economic liberals of beings.
The actual percentage of people in this country who truly want less government is very small I am afraid.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:50 pm to Volmanac
I like alot of what I have heard from Ron Paul, however I don't think he presented well on a stage to be honest. His manner of speaking, facial expressions, etc. are hard to overcome for the non-believer.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:52 pm to weagle99
Of course it is, which is why we are fricked.
At least the liberals acknowledge they want more government oversight and control. The GOP is largely made up of neo-cons, social conservatives and statists who hide behind the old party line of small government while actively going along with/actively pursuing a more powerful federal government.
At least the liberals acknowledge they want more government oversight and control. The GOP is largely made up of neo-cons, social conservatives and statists who hide behind the old party line of small government while actively going along with/actively pursuing a more powerful federal government.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:53 pm to Volmanac
This is true too often.
I'm very socially conservative in my beliefs. But I don't want the government to reinforce my beliefs. Nor do I need them to do so. Freedom is the answer. Freedom for me to raise my kids how I see fit and freedom to engage in the activities I see most beneficial to me and mine.
That remains true for economic and social activity. Social conservatives need to see the way forward is based on freedom and not coercion.
I'm very socially conservative in my beliefs. But I don't want the government to reinforce my beliefs. Nor do I need them to do so. Freedom is the answer. Freedom for me to raise my kids how I see fit and freedom to engage in the activities I see most beneficial to me and mine.
That remains true for economic and social activity. Social conservatives need to see the way forward is based on freedom and not coercion.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 6:55 pm to weagle99
quote:
however I don't think he presented well on a stage to be honest.
You can take someone who's somewhat attractive and has good "handlers" and that person will do well in politics. You can take someone who is ideologically sound, and without the ability to bullshite effectively that person will never be president.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 7:18 pm to Volmanac
On social conservatism, he's half-wrong and half-right.
Half-right because in a republic, states should have the rights to make decisions on social issues, although you normally have a judicial system which forces states to take stances they don't want to take, usually in the liberal direction.
However, half-wrong because in order to produce people who can function in a limited government environment, you need strong families. Productive citizens don't rise out of a vacuum. We know that intact, two-parent families do a far better job of producing these children than other families. So if you have too much tolerance of different lifestyles, you're going to produce worse adults.
We have produced a generation filled with feckless young men, which has helped produce single mothers needing the government to help care for their children. If you need more government to help single-parent families, than you can't have economic conservatism.
So while you don't necessarily want a strong federal government picking sides on particular social issues like gay marriage, you do need a socially conservative tone in the culture that minimizes the need for economic interventionism.
Half-right because in a republic, states should have the rights to make decisions on social issues, although you normally have a judicial system which forces states to take stances they don't want to take, usually in the liberal direction.
However, half-wrong because in order to produce people who can function in a limited government environment, you need strong families. Productive citizens don't rise out of a vacuum. We know that intact, two-parent families do a far better job of producing these children than other families. So if you have too much tolerance of different lifestyles, you're going to produce worse adults.
We have produced a generation filled with feckless young men, which has helped produce single mothers needing the government to help care for their children. If you need more government to help single-parent families, than you can't have economic conservatism.
So while you don't necessarily want a strong federal government picking sides on particular social issues like gay marriage, you do need a socially conservative tone in the culture that minimizes the need for economic interventionism.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 9:49 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
At least the liberals acknowledge they want more government oversight and control. The GOP is largely made up of neo-cons, social conservatives and statists who hide behind the old party line of small government while actively going along with/actively pursuing a more powerful federal government.
Posted on 6/23/14 at 10:07 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Social conservatives do not desire less government, they merely desire the government to enforce the values and behaviors which they deem acceptable. In practice, though not in principle, they are no different from what they accuse social/economic liberals of beings.
Absolutely. It's amazing the lengths the media went to - including Fox - to keep him from winning the GOP.
This is a classic: LINK
Also, for meatier substance:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ronpaulcensored
Posted on 6/23/14 at 10:15 pm to Volmanac
Complete horseshite...but of course RP said so it HAS to have some type of metaphysical meaning to it.
Yea, I'm fricking intolerant of certain lifestyles and habits like having as many babies as you want out of wedlock with absolutley no value judgements or means to support said babies.
Or having no value judgements placed on somebody who wants to shoot smack all day long and has a ripple effect throughout society both socially and economically...who pays for th.is persons decisions?
Has the amount of individual responsibility gone up or down in our society the last 40 years ? If no, why is that the case?
Yea, I'm fricking intolerant of certain lifestyles and habits like having as many babies as you want out of wedlock with absolutley no value judgements or means to support said babies.
Or having no value judgements placed on somebody who wants to shoot smack all day long and has a ripple effect throughout society both socially and economically...who pays for th.is persons decisions?
Has the amount of individual responsibility gone up or down in our society the last 40 years ? If no, why is that the case?
This post was edited on 6/23/14 at 10:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News