Started By
Message
locked post

Woman freed from death row four days after she was supposed to die -

Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:11 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
15048 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:11 pm
Four days after Mississippi sought to execute Michelle Byrom, the state Supreme Court tossed her capital murder conviction and ordered a new trial.

LINK /

Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30559 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Miss. death row inmate


Sounds like some weird beauty pageant
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:14 pm to
my political leanings have changed my views on the death penalty. If I can't trust the govt. to run healthcare, I can't trust them to kill american citizens judiciously.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56555 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

my political leanings have changed my views on the death penalty. If I can't trust the govt. to run healthcare, I can't trust them to kill american citizens judiciously.



Well, capital cases are always jury trials, no?
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:24 pm to
I thought about that, but it's the same conceptually in that the "government" is made up by humans, voted into power by humans, and their rules enforced by humans. same with a jury, the same juries that let OJ and Casey Anthony walk.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29824 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

Tiguar Woman freed from death row four days after she was supposed to die - my political leanings have changed my views on the death penalty. If I can't trust the govt. to run healthcare, I can't trust them to kill american citizens judiciously.


There is no rational justification for the death penalty in a civilized society. It is based only on emotion and blood lust.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Sounds like some weird beauty pageant



"And the winner is...



Michelle, nee Robert, Kosilek!"
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

my political leanings have changed my views on the death penalty. If I can't trust the govt. to run healthcare, I can't trust them to kill american citizens judiciously.

:applause:
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56555 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

I thought about that, but it's the same conceptually in that the "government" is made up by humans, voted into power by humans, and their rules enforced by humans. same with a jury, the same juries that let OJ and Casey Anthony walk.



I think that undermines your argument though.

If you think humans are incapable of accurately weighing evidence and coming to a conclusion of guilt, then fine.

But, that's very different than looking at the failures of government as a whole and questioning its capability.

Perhaps there should be a different standard for death row. In other words, "beyond a reasonable doubt" may be enough to convict, but it should maybe take more to send someone to death row.

But, in a case that is open and shut (say DNA evidence, etc.) you feeling on capital punishment shouldn't be swayed by your opinion on government.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:40 pm to
perhaps I worded it wrong, but my mistrust of human capability in government facilitated my mistrust of human capability on juries- and whether or not a capital trial is in the hands of "my peers", the law and enforcement therein is still an arm of the government.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

There is no rational justification for the death penalty in a civilized society. It is based only on emotion and blood lust.


Yes there is, if you commit the ultimate crime, you should pay the ultimate penalty. For a murderer, the death penalty is an appropriate punishment.

Murder is a crime where the victim cannot recover from it at all. Such a grotesque offense requires the criminal feel the full weight of that action and the death penalty is an appropriate method for that to happen.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32261 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:43 pm to
On average, someone sentenced to death in Mississippi spends about 14 years going through all of the appeals' processes. So this lady had exhausted her appeals and the AG asked the Supremes to set an execution date. Instead, apparently some new evidence appeared that showed that the judge had suppressed some evidence that the son had confessed. New evidence. Not evidence that had been seen before in the other appeals. I think 14 years' worth of appeals will turn up any errors made in any of the prior hearings - unless new evidence is found like in this case.
My question is where was the scum bag son that let his mother sit in prison for 14 years? But, I bet they find out in the end that she still had something to do with killing the husband.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32261 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

There is no rational justification for the death penalty in a civilized society. It is based only on emotion and blood lust.

An eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth. Not a hand for a toe or an arm for a finger. A life for a life is totally rational.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29824 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:03 pm to
Society teaches that murder is wrong by...murdering? That is the very definition of irrational.

Do you teach your children not to hit by striking them or to not swear by swearing at them?

Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32261 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Society teaches that murder is wrong by...murdering?
Pretty simple solution. If don't want to die by lethal injection then don't kill someone. You knew the consequences prior. Of all of the killings that go on in our state, very few of them get the death penalty.
Posted by fleaux
section 0
Member since Aug 2012
8741 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:19 pm to
So you think we have the death penalty to "teach society" something?? And i think you need to look up the definition of murder
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98200 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

On average, someone sentenced to death in Mississippi spends about 14 years going through all of the appeals' processes. So this lady had exhausted her appeals and the AG asked the Supremes to set an execution date. Instead, apparently some new evidence appeared that showed that the judge had suppressed some evidence that the son had confessed. New evidence. Not evidence that had been seen before in the other appeals. I think 14 years' worth of appeals will turn up any errors made in any of the prior hearings - unless new evidence is found like in this case. My question is where was the scum bag son that let his mother sit in prison for 14 years? But, I bet they find out in the end that she still had something to do with killing the husband.


The son confessed to the crime multiple times. That information was withheld from the jury.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Society teaches that murder is wrong by...murdering?


What should the punishment for kidnappers be, applying your logic?
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:29 pm to
I think one can definitely be pro DP in theory but against its application in our current judicial system.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 4/3/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

my political leanings have changed my views on the death penalty. If I can't trust the govt. to run healthcare, I can't trust them to kill american citizens judiciously.
I wouldn't say my political leaning did this, but nevertheless, the fact that we suck such huge arse at applying the death penalty has swayed me away from it.

Frankly, I no longer trust our jury system in the slightest on any case that has any significant technical aspects to it.

And hell, that's before we talk about normal human biases. Not racism, just normal bias. Fact is, in two cases with equal facts, if you look like Will Smith, your odds of being convicted much less getting the DP are much lower than if you look like Machete.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram