- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What realistic free agents would you like to see us sign?
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:43 pm
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:43 pm
I'm thinking if we can get Strief, Edelman, and Browner on board it would leave us in a pretty good spot going into the draft.
Who's on your list of remaining free agents you'd like to see in Black and Gold?
Who's on your list of remaining free agents you'd like to see in Black and Gold?
8
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:45 pm to LSUZombie
we talking signing with monopoly money?
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:49 pm to geauxtigers87
quote:Bone got this.
we talking signing with monopoly money?
We could sign Peyton to backup Brees if necessary.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:49 pm to LSUZombie
I think if you can get Strief under a 3 year deal, you could also get one other impact player and feel good heading into the draft. You'd probably just see Humber and Morgan type signings after that.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:50 pm to LSUZombie
We'll sign 2 more big names at the most. Edelman costs too much for a WR. Strief and Browner would be great at the right price...we just don't have that much money
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:51 pm to LSUZombie
quote:
trief, Edelman, and Browner
I thought you said realistic?
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:55 pm to kyledavis
quote:
I thought you said realistic?
If anyone said the Saints would be signing Byrd on Day 1 of free agency they'd have been laughed at.
With Loomis, anything is realistic.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:55 pm to LSUZombie
Strief and a competant pass-covering LB (Haralson...) and I think we're set for the draft.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 8:59 pm to LSUZombie
quote:I said before FA started that he was my dream guy but it would never happen, yet here we are.
If anyone said the Saints would be signing Byrd on Day 1 of free agency they'd have been laughed at.
If we want a guy bad enough we'll make room. But after Byrd we are going to be very selective about it.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:53 pm to LSUZombie
I don't get what people see in Edelman. He's a decent player, but he isn't the type of receiver that we need imo.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:59 pm to Peazey
With Lance gone he'd be a better option than Tanner. Not saying we should because he'll likely be overpaid somewhere.
Stills could fill Moore's role but he's versatile and shouldn't be boxed in like that.
We also need a big body guy to replace Colston soon, but I think they are still high on Toon(much higher than most here are anyway).
Stills could fill Moore's role but he's versatile and shouldn't be boxed in like that.
We also need a big body guy to replace Colston soon, but I think they are still high on Toon(much higher than most here are anyway).
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:06 pm to bonethug0108
I guess that I see Stills filling that Moore role. I think last year we saw him playing more of the deep plays because we didn't have anyone else who could come close to being that big play downfield threat. A more versatile Moore I guess is how I see him.
The need I'm probably most concerned about on offense, besides making sure that Brees stays protected, is the big play wr that's a threat to break one at any time to stretch the defense. I don't see that type of player in FA anyway, so I'm really looking to the draft for that.
The need I'm probably most concerned about on offense, besides making sure that Brees stays protected, is the big play wr that's a threat to break one at any time to stretch the defense. I don't see that type of player in FA anyway, so I'm really looking to the draft for that.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:09 pm to Peazey
We still don't have a deep threat outside of Stills so it would actually hurt us if he was forced to take on more of Moore's role.
With Toon in the wings, while I'd like a better big body guy to replace Colston I really think we need more of a speed guy to help stretch the field(as you said)
If we could find another Stills that'd be great.
With Toon in the wings, while I'd like a better big body guy to replace Colston I really think we need more of a speed guy to help stretch the field(as you said)
If we could find another Stills that'd be great.
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:10 pm to LSUZombie
Strief
Miles Austin for vet minimum
Miles Austin for vet minimum
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:12 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
If we could find another Stills that'd be great.
I wish we could find about.. 3 more Stills. That'd set us for a while
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:16 pm to LSUZombie
With Byrd only costing us 3.5M against the cap this year, it still leaves us room to make another deal. If we can't get Browner, I think we use the rest of our money to resign Strief and possibly bring Lance Moore back
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:20 pm to purplepylon
Sorry dude, Lance Moore is done. I'm with you on Strief though
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 10:21 pm
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:26 pm to Rand AlThor
I posted that with Lumbergh in mind.
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:32 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Miles Austin for vet minimum
No thanks he only has one hamstring
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News