- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Best Crawfish boiling pot? 100 quart
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:11 pm
Ive been looking at the cajun rocket pot.
4
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:12 pm to Toxey
I got a Bayou Classic pot from Lowe's that I'm happy with. I think most people mess up by getting cheap burners.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:25 pm to Toxey
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:29 pm to yellowfin
1,2
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:33 pm to yellowfin
how much do those run?
not very portable, i assume
not very portable, i assume
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:33 pm to yellowfin
pointless if you dont boil everyday.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:39 pm to Lester Earl
I think that one is about $1,800
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:40 pm to Toxey
I'd go with the 120qt. Plenty of room to get a large sack and the fixings going with room to move.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:48 pm to yellowfin
I can make that for less than 1k.
Eta: and it won't have those ugly ag welds.
Eta: and it won't have those ugly ag welds.
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:50 pm to TigerHam85
I'm in.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:54 pm to LSUdm21
quote:you can fit damn near 2 sacks in a 120. I think that is overkill because i doubt you have a burner or regulator to heat it efficiently.
I'd go with the 120qt. Plenty of room to get a large sack and the fixings going with room to move.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 1:57 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
you can fit damn near 2 sacks in a 120. I think that is overkill because i doubt you have a burner or regulator to heat it efficiently
Ok. I've been using the same pot for 30 years with a jet burner. I've never had any issues.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 2:01 pm to LSUdm21
quote:
I'd go with the 120qt. Plenty of room to get a large sack and the fixings going with room to move.
I have a 100qt. There is more than enough room for a sack and everything else. It gets tight with an 80 qt though.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 2:01 pm to TigerHam85
quote:
I can make that for less than 1k.
make me two like the one ya'll used in virgina
Posted on 2/4/14 at 2:24 pm to Toxey
I wouldn't pay for a rocket pot. Go with a standard 100qt, and get a high output burner.
I bought a double jet burner on Amazon. I changed the regulator to a 40psi. It is very bad boy.
I bought a double jet burner on Amazon. I changed the regulator to a 40psi. It is very bad boy.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 2:32 pm to Btrtigerfan
the jet, nor the 40psi reg isnt your bottle neck, it is your surface are of the liquid in your tank. I built a jet that connects 2 tanks to one jet. that thing is great. i havent used in a year or so but when i tested with/without the dual tanks i think it was like 5 mins to 9 minutes to go from tap temp to boil.
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 2/4/14 at 3:29 pm to yellowfin
We have one just like it. For smaller boils we also have a burner that is quiet. It might take a little longer to boil but you can stand around, drink a beer, and have a conversation without yelling at each other. Not the exact one but it looks something like this.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 4:23 pm to malvin
Posted on 2/4/14 at 4:42 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
i think it was like 5 mins to 9 minutes to go from tap temp to boil.
Mine will do it consistently at 9 minutes. Speed is only a factor working for big get togethers.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 5:09 pm to Btrtigerfan
I have used a 80qt my whole life...everybody now buys a 100qt for some reason. Maybe people put more than potatoes, garlic, onions, and lemons in their boil
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News