- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should "uncatchable" be done away with?
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:44 pm
A pass interference is a rule regardless, who are the refs to decide what is uncatchable and what is not?
Would QBs try to exploit this?
Would QBs try to exploit this?
8
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:45 pm to The Eric
quote:
Should "uncatchable" be done away with?
No
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:49 pm to The Eric
No.
You know it when you see it. Ball thrown 5 yards over a receiver's head? Uncatchable. Ball thrown at a TE where he can possibly make a play on it? Catchable.
You know it when you see it. Ball thrown 5 yards over a receiver's head? Uncatchable. Ball thrown at a TE where he can possibly make a play on it? Catchable.
This post was edited on 11/19/13 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:50 pm to The Eric
quote:
Should "uncatchable" be done away with?
Of course not.
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:51 pm to boom roasted
I honestly see no point in that decision being made.
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:51 pm to The Eric
So is the RB committing PI if he blocks a blitzing LB while the ball is in the air?
Posted on 11/19/13 at 1:52 pm to The Eric
quote:
I honestly see no point in that decision being made.
Really?
Posted on 11/19/13 at 2:12 pm to The Eric
It can be a little subjective, but DB's need whatever rules they can possibly get on their side in today's game.
Posted on 11/19/13 at 2:13 pm to The Eric
quote:
A pass interference is a rule regardless, who are the refs to decide what is uncatchable and what is not?
if they remove the uncatchable aspect, there would be designed PI throws by the QB's
Posted on 11/19/13 at 2:25 pm to The Eric
Well it's a lot more likely it would be uncatchable if the guy is getting interfered with. If he wasn't he could run an extra 5 yards and leap to catch it, etc. It makes no sense in my opinion.
Posted on 11/19/13 at 2:33 pm to The Eric
no but that ball was catchable last night.
Posted on 11/19/13 at 2:47 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
no but that ball was catchable last night.
Agree. The uncatchable rule is good when called properly.
Last night, it was hard to tell if the ball was catchable per se but at very least the receiver could have made a play on it and maybe caused a deflection etc. It was just too close to know without the interference.
One bad call doesn't mean the rule should change though.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News