Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Solution to NFL head injuries?

Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:30 am
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:30 am
Aggressive PED testing.

Thoughts?
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:31 am to
Take the helmets off. Seriously.
Posted by harry coleman beast
Left Field
Member since Aug 2008
52210 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:32 am to
No. Nobody forces anyone to play football. If you dont want concussions, don't play.
This post was edited on 1/30/13 at 9:33 am
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:33 am to
Better helmets
Posted by Mr Gardoki
AL
Member since Apr 2010
27652 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:40 am to
There is no one answer.
Posted by minimal
Member since Feb 2007
754 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:43 am to
Reduce concussions. Increase skull fractures. Brilliant. Why, do you suppose, did helmet usage develop in the first place? Style?
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31897 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Take the helmets off. Seriously.

So instead of a bunch of concussions we'll just have a few people with skull fractures and possibly death
Real smart
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:49 am to
Anyone care to inform me as why my suggestion has been completely ignored in favor of no helmets vs better helmets?
This post was edited on 1/30/13 at 9:50 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
118930 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:50 am to
I think his point is that as the technology advances to "protect" the head, players feel emboldened to use that technology to hit players.
If players were not wearing helmets, they certainly would not lead with their heads on tackles anymore.

But yet, that's not really practical. My suggestions would be to switch from tackle to flag football. That seems to be where it's heading anyway...
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Anyone care to inform me as why my suggestion has been completely ignored in favor of no helmets vs better helmets?



because it would be a negligible reduction in head injuries, and they already test for peds
Posted by Newbomb Turk
perfectanschlagen
Member since May 2008
9961 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:53 am to
quote:

No. Nobody forces anyone to play football. If you dont want concussions, don't play.




Exactly. You keep hearing all these players saying "Had they known ..." and "The NFL hid this from us ..."

Yet, you don't see any players quitting today because they're fearful of the long-term effects of head injuries. The players of today HAVE TO KNOW after all these lawsuits. Yet, not one has stepped up and said, "O.K., I'm going to give up my multimillion dollar contract because I'm afraid of the long-term consequences."

And, the players of yesterday wouldn't have done a damn thing differently. Don't get me wrong -- I think they're a lying bunch of scumbags because they ALL KNEW. And, yet, they kept on playing.

In legal parlance it's called ASSUMPTION OF RISK. You want that multimillion dollar contract and the "playa" lifestyle -- there's a price to pay.
Posted by tigergym
South Central LA
Member since Jan 2009
1077 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:53 am to

quote:

Better helmets


Football helmets have gone through a major overhaul the last 5 years or so.
The materials used now are lighter and suppose to protect just as well.
Lighter ... very much so.
Protect just as well... doesn't seem to be.


Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
18981 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Better helmets
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23142 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:02 am to
1) understand there is no solution for the culmination of minor impacts

2) remove 5yd no contact rule, this will disincentivize passing where most of the big hits occur

3) remove qb protection other than traditional roughing the passer, this will further disincentivize passing in general and furthermore will prioritize short passing over downfield passing due to more focus on protecting your own qb

4) widen hashes to collegiate widths, this will create space on the football field allowing receivers wider windows to find openings, of this will also open up scoring in a safer manner and offset the negative offensive consequences of 2 and 3

That's a start

Posted by High Life Bengal
Lakeland, FL
Member since Dec 2009
273 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:07 am to
Go back to shite helmets. Once one of those safeties bust his head open hitting a WR, he will learn not to do it again. Problem solved.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35323 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Anyone care to inform me as why my suggestion has been completely ignored in favor of no helmets vs better helmets?



Has there ever been a successful PED testing regime? The best is in cycling and it's still very flawed. Testing regimes are by their very nature reactive. You have a better chance of positive outcomes by mitigating the impact of head shots than you do of limiting the growth in speed and size of players
Posted by busbeepbeep
When will then be now?
Member since Jan 2004
18307 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Take the helmets off. Seriously.

this
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:18 am to
Go back to leather helmets or make the helmet material much softer. With the increase of helmet technology players feel invulnerable and start launching themselves leading with their head. Players wouldn't do this if they had less protection.
This post was edited on 1/30/13 at 10:19 am
Posted by WB504
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
5871 posts
Posted on 1/30/13 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Go back to leather helmets or make the helmet material much softer. With the increase of helmet technology players feel invulnerable and start launching themselves leading with their head. Players wouldn't do this if they had less protection.


Hines Ward came out and said the exact same thing a couple months ago. Players now use the helmets as weapons, but if we revert back to the leather helmets, you would see more textbook tackling and less people using their helmets as missle projections.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram