Started By
Message

re: What is the board's opinions regarding tiny houses?

Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:24 pm to
Posted by Rize
Spring Texas
Member since Sep 2011
15816 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:24 pm to
We talking about penis's or houses?
Posted by brgfather129
Los Angeles, CA
Member since Jul 2009
17103 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:38 pm to
quote:

I think there is a happy medium between wayyyy too big and super tiny.


THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID
Posted by mahdragonz
Member since Jun 2013
6939 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:42 pm to
I understand the concept but the ones I've been in seem low quality.

I know people want to do things on the cheap, but a tiny house with crappy windows and no insulation seems like a very misguided approach.

And frick that sleeping in lofts with six inches above your head. Frick that to hell.
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21180 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:44 pm to
quote:

No thanks. I'd rather my dumps just stink up the bathroom, not the whole house.



That's all I can think of when they check out the really compact places.

Although some of the houses I see em checking on those shows aren't really tiny by 1960's/70's standards.
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

And frick that sleeping in lofts with six inches above your head. Frick that to hell.


Couldn't do that. I ain't no dog in a den. Besides the claustrophobia, I don't want any any stairs or climbing. These 200 ft^2 tiny homes I see on TV are nuts. I could probably do 600.
Posted by Cold Drink
Member since Mar 2016
3482 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

No thanks. I'd rather my dumps just stink up the bathroom, not the whole house

You're joking but I'm serious. I could and would 100% want a tiny house until it comes to this part. Last thing I need is to pull an enola gay on my tiny arse bathroom 2 ft from the pot of gumbo gently simmering on my tiny arse stove.
This post was edited on 7/25/16 at 11:55 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64639 posts
Posted on 7/25/16 at 11:57 pm to
quote:


I don't get how they justify spending 50k on a 150 SF house, knowing they could triple the size for the same price or less...assuming they aren't trying to be mobile


My wife was watching a show on these "tiny houses" earlier tonight. From what I gather mobility is something these sheep who follow this stupid fad are looking for. In the episode I caught, they spent almost $70,000. Guess they were too stupid to realize you could buy one hell of nice fifth wheel for that kind of money and have over twice the room.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260902 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:12 am to
quote:

In the episode I caught, they spent almost $70,000. Guess they were too stupid to realize you could buy one hell of nice fifth wheel for that kind of money and have over twice the room.


If you spend over 30k, you're doing it wrong. Many can be done with some DIY for less than 10k
Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8767 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:17 am to
Honest to God, I never really knew houses of these sizes were "in," except in way out scenic places where they might be considered vacation homes or whatnot.

I certainly haven't seen anything of the like here.
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63408 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:19 am to
Wife and I are continually downsizing. A tiny house is just too damn small, though. 1000-1100 sq2 is just about right for us.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:22 am to
quote:

You're joking but I'm serious. I could and would 100% want a tiny house until it comes to this part. Last thing I need is to pull an enola gay on my tiny arse bathroom 2 ft from the pot of gumbo gently simmering on my tiny arse stove.


That wasn't a joke
Posted by Canard Noir
Houston
Member since Apr 2014
1397 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:25 am to
My earlier camp joke aside, it does kind of bring up something that is interesting to me when I watch the house hunter type shows. I find it humorous that we, as a population, seem to require a ridiculous amount of space compared to everyone else in the world. You see a couple that's looking at an apartment abroad that sees a 2 burner stove and a half size fridge and they immediately freak out. What couple has so much cooking going on that they ever have more than 2 burners going at a time? On top of that, the same place doesn't have a 2 bedroom closet for her shoes so that's obviously a deal breaker. I know land has been cheap in the US until recently but doesn't it seem some kind of compromise between these ridiculous tiny houses and our standard McMansions seem to be a better answer?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260902 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:32 am to
quote:

My earlier camp joke aside, it does kind of bring up something that is interesting to me when I watch the house hunter type shows. I find it humorous that we, as a population, seem to require a ridiculous amount of space compared to everyone else in the world. You see a couple that's looking at an apartment abroad that sees a 2 burner stove and a half size fridge and they immediately freak out. What couple has so much cooking going on that they ever have more than 2 burners going at a time? On top of that, the same place doesn't have a 2 bedroom closet for her shoes so that's obviously a deal breaker. I know land has been cheap in the US until recently but doesn't it seem some kind of compromise between these ridiculous tiny houses and our standard McMansions seem to be a better answer?


New homes are 1,000 sq. ft larger today than they were in 1973. It has less to do with need and more to do with ego.



People wonder why people seemed to be able to afford more in the 70's while making meager wages, housing is a good place to start.

Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142118 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 12:42 am to
quote:

Sears Catalog Homes (sold under the Sears Modern Homes name) were catalog and kit houses sold primarily through mail order by Sears, Roebuck and Company, an American retailer. Sears reported that more than 70,000 of these homes were sold in North America between 1908 and 1940.[1] More than 370 different home designs in a wide range of architectural styles and sizes were offered over the program's 32-year history. Sears homes can be found across the continental United States. While sold primarily to East Coast and Midwest states, Sears homes have been located as far south as Florida and as far west as California. Examples have also been found in Alaska. A handful of Sears homes have been identified in Canada.[2] Elgin, Illinois (a city approximately 35 miles WNW of Chicago) has the largest known collection of Sears homes in one community with more than 200 identified houses from Sears.[3]

Sears Modern Homes offered the latest technology available to house buyers in the early part of the twentieth century. Central heating, indoor plumbing, and electricity were all new developments in house design that "Modern Homes" incorporated, although not all of the houses were designed with these conveniences. Primarily shipped via railroad boxcars, these kits included most of the materials needed to build a house. Once delivered, many of these houses were assembled by the new homeowner, relatives, friends and neighbors, in a fashion similar to the traditional barn-raisings of farming families.








Sears Homes archives
Posted by Canard Noir
Houston
Member since Apr 2014
1397 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:17 am to
Totally agree, my wife and I live in about 1700sf and I bet we use 1000 of it regularly. I'm watching my friends' buy enormous whatevers and I can't fathom why. I live in a great neighborhood and choose retiring 10 years earlier over some uselessly enormous spec home in a neighborhood devoid of trees, thank you very much.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83940 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:19 am to
quote:

I'd rather live in a small house in an area with stuff to do than a McMansion in buttfrick nowhere.


Not me. I'll take the mansion.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
47401 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 1:35 am to
I don't think they'd hold up well during some storms. Too small for me though some are cute like a doll house.
Posted by BeaverHunter
Member since Oct 2015
419 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 4:15 am to
I had my brother build me a tiny greenhouse in my yard, used 4 pallets as the base. We tag teamed a (no comment type) it heald up they slept in it.

I know CSB I just can't mention that story round 'cher
Posted by MBclass83
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
9365 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 4:31 am to
I could do it for a while but for a family, I don't see it working.
Posted by GeauxOCDP
Member since Jul 2015
1009 posts
Posted on 7/26/16 at 4:41 am to
I'm good on the 300 sq ft house. My closet is 160 sq ft by itself
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram