Started By
Message

re: WBRZ reporting missing boy found dead

Posted on 12/23/14 at 9:09 am to
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30248 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 9:09 am to
quote:

I'm wondering what sort of protection they had around the hole,if any,before the incident occurred.


Obviously, I have no idea but the news specifically said there was no protection around the hole. To me, that leaves the city with some responsibility. Hell, if a store is required to put out a wet floor sign or be held responsible for an fall, shouldn't the city be held at least responsible to some degree for a unknown depth hidden hole in a residential area that is filled with water ?

Again, I'm not sue happy whatsoever and always tend to lean towards personal responsibility with accidents like this, but to me the city bears some responsibility here too.
This post was edited on 12/23/14 at 9:14 am
Posted by meauxjeaux2
watson
Member since Oct 2007
60283 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 9:10 am to
i'm kinda leaning towards this line of thinking myself TBH
Posted by Isabelle
Member since Jul 2012
2726 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:13 am to
Big problem with the child missing sometime between 12:30 and 5:30. That is a 5 hour span. How can you not know your child is missing for that long a period of time? Responsibility lies on whoever was supposed to be watching the child. This is just plain stupidity and neglect on the responsible party's part. Just sickening.
Posted by Isabelle
Member since Jul 2012
2726 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:15 am to
That is a"normal" I am not at all familiar with. 4 years old!!!
Posted by Isabelle
Member since Jul 2012
2726 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:22 am to
Tried to pull a "Casey Anthony".
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30248 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:23 am to
quote:

ried to pull a "Casey Anthony".


I kinda doubt that. I think they were just drunk, high, preoccupied, or all 3 and just forgot about the kid for awhile. Black people don't often pull Casey Anthony type shite.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9454 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:29 am to
There are OSHA regs that require open excavations to either be covered, barricaded or fenced when work activity isn't taking place. If this was an accident, the city, contractor and any subcontractor involved in the excavation are going to get sued. If someone killed the child and then dumped the body, it may be a different story.
Posted by LSUengineer12
The Best Side
Member since Dec 2011
1850 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:34 am to
Call me crazy, but I feel like if someone wanted to kill a child and hide the body they wouldn't "hide" him in a hole dug by the parish 25ft from their house..
Posted by TigerTattle
Out of Town
Member since Sep 2007
6623 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

they wouldn't "hide" him in a hole dug by the parish 25ft from their house..
Unless they were looking to get money out of it.

I don't think that's what happened. I think the child fell in.

Questions are: was the hole protected or marked; how can you not know that the parish dug a hole 25 feet from your house; even if you live in a vacuum and somehow didn't know, how can you let your 4yo run unsupervised for 4-5 hours?

If the hole wasn't protected the parish shares the blame, but imo the guardian/parent holds the larger share.
Posted by White Roach
Member since Apr 2009
9454 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:46 am to
I agree with your logic. However, (presumably) you and I are both rational and law abiding people who would never kill a child. I have no idea what goes on in the minds of the social miscreants in this world.

If I were BRPD, I wouldn't just assume that this was a tragic accident. That seems to be the most plausible, logical and likely explanation, but it's not the only possibility.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30527 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:55 am to
quote:

The only negligence was leaving your 4 year old unsupervised for 5 hours.


This...
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 10:58 am to
Bump for update on the hole:

quote:

He said a contractor backfilled the hole with “flowable fill and sand” and cement the bottom, sometime between the middle and end of September. “It was solid,” Harmon said. “We have photos of the site as it was graded and leveled … Sometime between September and now there was a migration of soils.”
Posted by slapahoe
USA
Member since Sep 2009
7442 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:07 am to
how deep is this hole?
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:09 am to
I believe they said 3' deep
Posted by slapahoe
USA
Member since Sep 2009
7442 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:11 am to
damn that is terrible. Surely if the kid fell in there, LE will be able to find scratches and scrapes on the side of the hole where the kid was trying to get out. If none of that is there......foul play is back into action IMO.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36014 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:12 am to
The contractor is responsible for their work for a period of time. I suspect they may have done something wrong allowing the soils to settle. Maybe it wasn't compacted properly. Maybe there was a leak in the sewer thus allowing soil to wash down the sewer line? It will be investigated thoroughly now.

None of that makes the guardians of that child any less responsible for leaving him unattended for an extended period of time. Four year olds need careful supervision.

Really a tragic situation.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79188 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:12 am to
quote:

"I'm pissed off; Kip Holden will hear from me tomorrow morning," Lesly Reed, the child's aunt, said in frustration about the gaping hole just feet from her nephew's house and the spot where his lifeless body was found. "That's negligent, and it is unacceptable. It could have been anybody's child, anybody. [A detective] almost fell in that hole yesterday," she continued.


This is just beyond pathetic. Who loses track of a 4 year old for hours? I don't lose track of my dog for more than a half hour at a time..
Posted by Tanker225
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
65 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 11:17 am to
Such a sad loss. I pray for the family and friends.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30248 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

believe they said 3' deep


They needed a scuba diver to get the kid out. It had to be more than 3', don't ya think?

I thought I read 20' deep, but I don't remember where I read that. But, I doubt that would have saw him through the murky water if he 20' down, but maybe he was just submerged 7'+ feet or so.

Posted by El Jefe
_______(\___ southeast of disorder
Member since Jan 2004
1223 posts
Posted on 12/23/14 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

They needed a scuba diver to get the kid out.


No they didn't.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram