Started By
Message

re: Walker mayor suing state and federal governments

Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:14 pm to
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:14 pm to


quote:

I wonder if this made some of the flooding south of i12 on range worse.



Of course it did. Some guy on this thread said "well, my house stayed dry so that was good so I could go help my friend on the north side who got flooded."

I don't want friends like that.

What about share the load?
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

That wall saved my home. I live just south of tve interstate in Walker and we had water touching our slab with the wall.

Had it not been there we'd have been above my roof. I feel very sorry for the people north of i12 and spent the entire day helping a friend clean up thier place from a total loss, but like I told him, had I flooded too, there Would be no one who stayed dry to help.


I don't want friends like you.

"Yes, I ran so the pit bull could eat you. But if I hadn't, there would be no one to come bandage you up!" Fricker.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 10:17 pm
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31895 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:17 pm to
Glad to see all the hydrologists and hydraulic experts have already studied the drainage basins and confirmed that he wall was indeed the issue.

Good job!

Now onto brain surgery or, better yet, rocket design.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110841 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

Normally I'd be gung ho and root him on but there are people that still can't even get to their homes. If you're elected to serve the people, serve the people in their immediate need. The dick measuring can wait.
It's silly to think he should wait to take up for his people. He needs to get out in front of this and not waste any time.
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:19 pm to
Posted by gsvar2004
Member since Nov 2007
7954 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

I don't want friends like you.


Good

If my house had flooded that family with 2 little boys would have had nowhere to go asshat. That's what I was referring to.
Posted by Eightballjacket
Member since Jan 2016
7314 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:24 pm to
Is there any way that we can blame this on the oil companies?
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

f my house had flooded that family with 2 little boys would have had nowhere to go asshat. That's what I was referring to.


Agreed. Nobody with kids lives north of I-12.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31895 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:42 pm to
You are aware that even the most stringent drainage design is capped at a 100-year event?

This one was 500-year+

Do you understand what that means? Ok, I'll help you. The drainage crossings under I-12 would perform adequately should a heavy rain event happen, say, a 10 to 25-year storm event. This means flow rates would be such that water would/should not "back up". Under conditions like the one that just occurred would overwhelm the system causing said backups on the side where the flow originates (the north side).

But, let's not let reasonable engineering practices get on the way.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 10:46 pm
Posted by The Next
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
417 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

It's silly to think he should wait to take up for his people. He needs to get out in front of this and not waste any time.


If he wants to take up for his people, run to the news to talk about where to get relief supplies or when and where people can get to their homes to start assessing the damage. Coordinate some clean up crews. Start cleaning out the drainage ditches. Spend your time for what the people elected you to do. Don't waste your time on a lawsuit that will take years to litigate and IF they win, will likely never see a dime of settlement. Plus, whose going to pay all the court costs for this circus show? I'd be willing to bet Walkers tax base will take a huge hit for many years. And if they happen to actually get any money, if be willing to bet the actual residents don't get a penny of it. It's just like someone else said, this is all for publicity and to put his name on something.
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:49 pm to
Yes, I agree. Removing a few concrete blocks every 1/4 of a mile is quite unreasonable.

Especially when the Mayor of Walker has been calling it to the attention of the DOTD engineers for OVER 3 years. Maybe if he did it for 497 MORE years the DOTD would have heard him.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20507 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

You are aware that even the most stringent drainage design is capped at a 100-year event?

This one was 500-year+


Exactly. They'll have a tough time proving that DOTD violated an important thing in construction law called the "standard of care."
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

Yes, I agree. Removing a few concrete blocks every 1/4 of a mile is quite unreasonable.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31895 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:00 pm to
And, from your analysis, that is exactly all it would take to mitigate a water burden from a watershed of several hundred square miles experiencing a 500-year event.

H&H analysis goes far beyond what the naked eye interprets.
Posted by LSUDAN1
Member since Oct 2010
8973 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:00 pm to
Walker's mayor is certifiable crazy. I had to meet with him several times and he is one of the most insane Mayors I have ever met.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31895 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:02 pm to
He is going to lose his case.
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
6868 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:03 pm to
Isn't this ammo for ins companies to try and not pay out. Of course it's all no secret but making a big deal that there was negligence is bad for the property owners getting their dues. Or am I off on this?
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:09 pm to
The walls are just what the photo is showing


The deck and the girders below are blocking even more flow, but I agree that you can just only build so high. You can't design everything for a 500 year event, which is pretty much what USACE wanted to do after Katrina.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18284 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:10 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/23/16 at 9:45 am
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 11:10 pm to
Takes years of schooling to figure this out

And they didn't even remove 1 block for 18 miles.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 11:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram