Started By
Message

re: Spinoff- how old is too old to wear cargo shorts?

Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:13 pm to
Posted by mouton
Savannah,Ga
Member since Aug 2006
28276 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:13 pm to
Actually shorts are meant to be short. THese stupid shorts that hang below your knee are a newer phenomenom.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13560 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Actually shorts are meant to be short. THese stupid shorts that hang below your knee are a newer phenomenom.


10"-11" shorts fall about an inch above or hang right above the knee. What is wrong with that? Yes, I understand historically that they were nuthuggers, but that doesnt mean it was right.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
COINTELPRO Fan
Member since May 2012
55560 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Slight exaggeration, but you cant tell me that you wears these and honestly feel masculine. The "frat" shorts were never intended for men to wear and it's a travesty that theyve been introduced.
Yeah man, these guys aren't masculine at all .





Shorts didn't became popular in America until after WWII, and they certainly didn't go below the knee back then.
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:22 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32398 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Slight exaggeration, but you cant tell me that you wears these and honestly feel masculine. The "frat" shorts were never intended for men to wear and it's a travesty that theyve been introduced. I'd rather drink a beer with someone wearing cargo shorts past their knee than someone wearing 5" chino's.


I don't have those particular shorts (those are swim wear) but I have these:

LINK

ETA: I'm also short, so they probably don't look quite as short on me as they may look on some people. They are still a good 5 inches or so above my knee, though.
This post was edited on 4/15/15 at 2:24 pm
Posted by sushisucks
Member since Dec 2013
599 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:21 pm to
frat
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13560 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Yeah man, these guys aren't masculine at all


I honestly do even know if I should reply because of how asinine this post is, but here goes...

In the first picture, 10-11" shorts werent even invented yet, and I cant believe I actually have to spell this out for you, but there's a difference between going on a combat mission (shorts would be incredibly stupid in a climate like that, but that's a tangent point) and going to a backyard bbq with some pastel 5" chinos. They are not the same thing.

The bottom picture is irrelevant because those are at least 8-9" inseams which is not what's being discussed.

quote:

they certainly didn't go below the knee back then


In what world does sitting an inch above the knee, what I actaully said, really mean sitting below the knee? Please explain.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13560 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 2:26 pm to
You see, those shorts would look really nice if they'd be about 4" longer and sit an inch above the knee.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram