- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Simple math equation. Am I retarded or do people really not understand pemdas
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:01 pm to Casty McBoozer
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:01 pm to Casty McBoozer
quote:There you have it. The mighty OT is smarter than scientific calculators
Simple math equation. Am I retarded or do people really not understand pemdas Mathmatically, it's 10. Moronically, you can get all kinds of dumbass answers.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:03 pm to fleaux
quote:
Why did you divide before multiplying?
When you have multiplication and division in the same problem they are considered on the same level and you work left to right.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:05 pm to The Mick
You would have to write it as
6^2/(2*3+4) in order to get 3.6 Mick
Mick you aren't a dumbass. 3.6 people are smart but they are just seeing the equation differently. People saying 10 are straight up not very smart
6^2/(2*3+4) in order to get 3.6 Mick
Mick you aren't a dumbass. 3.6 people are smart but they are just seeing the equation differently. People saying 10 are straight up not very smart
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:05 pm to BayouBengals03
OT ballers pay people to do their math.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:12 pm to lsupride87
Ah gotcha.
I think the old fricks don't know about writing problems so computers can read it. We're all thinking the 2*3+4 is all part of the divisor and you'd get 3.6.
I think the old fricks don't know about writing problems so computers can read it. We're all thinking the 2*3+4 is all part of the divisor and you'd get 3.6.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:14 pm to The Mick
Yeh like I said I won't call 3.6 people dumb. They are simply looking at the written equation a little differently. However people saying 10 have no clue about math rules
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:18 pm to 7thWardTiger
Wolfram Alpha agrees with your answer.
But yes, you are retarded for writing an equation that horrible.
But yes, you are retarded for writing an equation that horrible.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:18 pm to 7thWardTiger
Double
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:19 pm to lsupride87
If the 2*3 was the divisor and the +4 was not then you'd get 10
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:20 pm to The Mick
And assuming that is always wrong. They are doing multiplication over division simply because the *3 is written as (3). They are bumblefricked with the parenthesis
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:20 pm to 7thWardTiger
Triple
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 10:29 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:22 pm to Plankton
So wolfram alpha says 58 guys
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:26 pm to lsupride87
It is insane but I see how people are getting the 3 answers. They think since the 3 is in ( ) it must be part of the divisor
the old fricks would need the ( ) to be as tall as the top of the dividend and on the side of the division part in order to see the problem as written
the old fricks would need the ( ) to be as tall as the top of the dividend and on the side of the division part in order to see the problem as written
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:26 pm to 7thWardTiger
i'd be embarrassed to say 58 is the answer
it's 10
it's 10
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:28 pm to LSU1NSEC
The 10 camp is the special ed program of this thread.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:32 pm to LSU1NSEC
quote:Please tell me you are a lawyer or a doctor and not an engineer or accountant
i'd be embarrassed to say 58 is the answer it's 10
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:34 pm to The Mick
quote:
The 10 camp is the special ed program of this thread.
They're pretty stubborn, but I think it's pretty obvious to see where the 10 comes from.
The OP is an obvious troll, especially by the way he put spaces before and after the forward slash.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:36 pm to Plankton
quote:It isn't the OP. This problem has been on the Internet since it existed. They knew multiple people would get in wrong and truly dig in. Even after I have posted the answer 58 on a scientific calculator, and even after you have stated wolfram alpha says it is 58, people still will say 10 and have the balls to call others retarded
They're pretty stubborn, but I think it's pretty obvious to see where the 10 comes from.
The OP is an obvious troll, especially by the way he put spaces before and after the forward slash.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News