- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Making A Murder O-T Lounge Thread
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:07 am to AlbertMeansWell
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:07 am to AlbertMeansWell
I agree, but I don't think the point of the documentary was to convince viewers he was innocent. It was to show how corrupt and even evil our criminal justice system can be. It did a great job of that.
What they did to the retarded kid was disgusting.
What they did to the retarded kid was disgusting.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:07 am to FournetteForEver7
quote:
But why not wait till after he got his settlement
If you think you're going to get away with it, what difference does it make?
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:07 am to bountyhunter
quote:
OJ deserved to walk, so does this man. And FYI, I do believe Avery killed the woman
You've got some serious jacked arse views of how the world should work.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:08 am to AlbertMeansWell
quote:
Link works fine for me but here it is for copy and paste reference:
LINK
this info is cited in many other articles.
I do think he did it. I think without the coerced confession of his nephew and the shady business of the DA he wouldn't have been convicted. Again, there is more than enough "reasonable doubt" when you look at the case in its entirety to overturn the sentence.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:09 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
I agree, but I don't think the point of the documentary was to convince viewers he was innocent. It was to show how corrupt and even evil our criminal justice system can be. It did a great job of that.
What they did to the retarded kid was disgusting.
I agree with everything in your post.
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 1:09 am
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:10 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
You've got some serious jacked arse views of how the world should work.
That's how the legal system works. We are looking at this with 20/20 hindsight and not looking at it with the limited vision of the present and the shadow of double jeopardy. By your logic we should still be running the Wild West system of justice and hang anyone who is "right" or "wrong". Both cases displayed a body of evidence that was tainted and did not prove beyond all question that the person on trial was guilty.
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 1:12 am
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:11 am to AlbertMeansWell
Cool. Let's see some facts. At least the person who posted this on reddit had some legit info to back up his claims.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:14 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
. It was to show how corrupt and even evil our criminal justice system can be
Should scare the hell out of anyone.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:18 am to lsuwontonwrap
quote:
Cool. Let's see some facts. At least the person who posted this on reddit had some legit info to back up his claims.
Remember that time you started a bonfire and didn't know a dead / missing woman's possessions were in the barrel / pit? Yeah, me neither.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:20 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
I agree, but I don't think the point of the documentary was to convince viewers he was innocent. It was to show how corrupt and even evil our criminal justice system can be. It did a great job of that.
What they did to the retarded kid was disgusting.
Well said. In hindsight, seeing how corrupt the system was that colluded in bringing Avery to "justice" is an eye-opener to many people. Some people (like myself) are less shocked. There's been similar collusion between public appointed attorneys and the state prosecution going way back. Unfortunately, this is nothing new.
The problem I have is the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The only reason they did not hear Avery's or Dassey's appeals is because it would open a floodgate for every other case that the crooked DA handled. It makes their entire State Criminal Justice system look suspect.
It comes down to if you believe correcting our legal system is worth the life of a woman. I think at minimum the Dassey boy is innocent. What of his life? What about the lives of others who are sent to prison without sufficient evidence?
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 1:24 am
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:37 am to bountyhunter
Haven't watched the show, but people are surprised at how dysfunctional our legal system is? It's been like this for a very long time. Sometimes it puts POS away with sketchy evidence, other times it is used to put innocent people away on the same sketchy evidence. Even DNA evidence isn't conclusive.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 1:55 am to AlbertMeansWell
I really enjoyed him with the braves
Posted on 1/4/16 at 2:08 am to alabamabuckeye
quote:
Even DNA evidence isn't conclusive.
Ironically enough, the DNA evidence introduced in the Avery case was tainted. Granted, the prosecution did sufficiently defend that the analyst that did the work simply tainted the control sample of the test and not the actual sample gathered from the crime scene. But the mishap in that situation did introduce reasonable doubt with that piece of evidence as well.
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 2:09 am
Posted on 1/4/16 at 2:52 am to AlbertMeansWell
quote:
all the articles presenting these Facts
Here are the words of the articles author even knowing all of the facts in the docuseries and those that the filmmakers omitted.
quote:
I don't know if Avery did or didn't do it
That is where I am at and for that reason I could not convict them. That is how our system works.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 3:01 am to AlbertMeansWell
They convicted the boy on his testimony and used the murder taking place in the bedroom with the woman roped by the wrists and chained at the ankles. They also used his testimony that he cut her throat.
No evidence provided of rope fibers, DNA,Blood of any kind anywhere in the room. They didn't even claim they scrubbed the murder site.
That is enough doubt for me. Is the guy probably guilty? maybe. However, with all the shoddy police work and planting of evidence to make the conviction if I was on the jury I wouldn't have voted guilty.
No evidence provided of rope fibers, DNA,Blood of any kind anywhere in the room. They didn't even claim they scrubbed the murder site.
That is enough doubt for me. Is the guy probably guilty? maybe. However, with all the shoddy police work and planting of evidence to make the conviction if I was on the jury I wouldn't have voted guilty.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 3:08 am to AlbertMeansWell
Hope you never serve on a jury
Posted on 1/4/16 at 3:33 am to CtotheVrzrbck
quote:
Hope you never serve on a jury
I've sat in on 40+ jury trials and it's honestly amazing how one sided jurors are. I've NEVER seen a jury come back with a non-guilty verdict and I've probably been leaning not non-guilty per se, but I'm not 100 percent convinced in 80 percent of them.
Most people just aren't open minded and make up their minds before they even step foot in the court room. It sucks, but it's true.
This post was edited on 1/4/16 at 3:34 am
Posted on 1/4/16 at 6:56 am to AlbertMeansWell
I thought he was innocent as well until I read the 21 page transcript of Brendon Dassey's interview. I'm now convinced they did it.
Posted on 1/4/16 at 6:59 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:Brendan did. He even specified that they used some of her clothes as rags to clean the blood in the garage with bleach.
They didn't even claim they scrubbed the murder site.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News