- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:41 pm to The Mick
They've been doing this a while
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:42 pm to Topwater Trout
Well...they are paying a teller to provide a service to a non-customer. And you paid it.
So what's the problem exactly?
So what's the problem exactly?
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:42 pm to The Mick
IberiaBank had a big class action lawsuit against them a couple years ago IIRC and had to pay back a lot of clients excess overdraft fees because of the way they ran transactions through. Maybe this is a way for them to recoup.
They tried to push me to open an account with them to avoid the fee and I was like "no thanks, just give me my cash." Then had the nerve to ask me how I wanted it back. Well, you already broke down one of my Benjamins so it doesn't really matter, does it.
They tried to push me to open an account with them to avoid the fee and I was like "no thanks, just give me my cash." Then had the nerve to ask me how I wanted it back. Well, you already broke down one of my Benjamins so it doesn't really matter, does it.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:43 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:Small, like $300 some odd...
how much was the check?
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:43 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
Regions started charging me $8 a month just to have a checking account and they didn't tell me it was going to happen after a decade of not doing that.
Really?
My bank charges a monthly fee if I don't carry a certain balance or have direct deposit for the type of account I have. Is that the case with your account? If not I would close the account and go elsewhere. That is almost $100 for nothing.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:43 pm to LSURussian
A large majority of banks do this now. This is nothing new.
Here is why:
Let's take Iberia for example. These branches get cash shipments from a larger bank (Chase). That money is ordered and Iberia PAYS for that service. That money is kept on hand to service IBERIA customers. When a non customer comes in to cash a check they charge a "convenience fee" so to speak. Customers can choose to pay that fee ($6), cash the check at their own bank ($0) or deposit it into their own account ($0). If that check bounces it's $35. Some would rather have the peace of mind of it not bouncing and being charged $35. Some don't have that amount in their own account to be used as recourse to cash the check.
The more you know
Here is why:
Let's take Iberia for example. These branches get cash shipments from a larger bank (Chase). That money is ordered and Iberia PAYS for that service. That money is kept on hand to service IBERIA customers. When a non customer comes in to cash a check they charge a "convenience fee" so to speak. Customers can choose to pay that fee ($6), cash the check at their own bank ($0) or deposit it into their own account ($0). If that check bounces it's $35. Some would rather have the peace of mind of it not bouncing and being charged $35. Some don't have that amount in their own account to be used as recourse to cash the check.
The more you know
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:44 pm to LSURussian
quote:Why haven't banks done this all along then, since it's such a normal thing to you?
They weren't giving service to THEIR customer. They were giving it to YOU.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:45 pm to TigerPox
quote:
My roommate gave me a check and I wanted to make sure it was good so I cashed it at his bank instead of depositing it with the possibility of it bouncing. $6 charged. I was so livid standing there.
You could have just called. You are allowed to inquire if a certain account has sufficient funds to cover a check.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:47 pm to The Mick
A lot of this came about at banks when the government dropped the hammer on interchange fees (fee the banks get paid when you use your debit/credit card at point of sale). Banks lost a TON of revenue from this. So they started charging non customers to cash checks and now MOST accounts have stipulations to waive a fee.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:48 pm to The Mick
Iberia Bank haircut surcharge.
Been doing it awhile, I think.
Been doing it awhile, I think.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:48 pm to TigerPox
quote:
Capital One doesn't have that technology yet.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:49 pm to The Mick
quote:
Small, like $300 some odd...
OT Balla Status [CONFIRMED] unknown
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:49 pm to belowmebama
When I worked at a bank in college, we got our cash from the Feds, which was where we put our order into. It didn't come from Chase or a larger bank (I worked for a mid-level bank). We could only keep like 200,000$ TOTAL in the vault unless it was during tax season when we would order a lot more money because we had some big clients that were check cashing places and just the fact that you are cashing a lot of large government checks around that time.
I don't understand your reasoning. I'm sorry.
quote:If the check is charged back it's only like a $3.00 fee to your account (but an NSF fee if you do have anything clear that you thought you had the money for).
Customers can choose to pay that fee ($6), cash the check at their own bank ($0) or deposit it into their own account ($0). If that check bounces it's $35. Some would rather have the peace of mind of it not bouncing and being charged $35.
I don't understand your reasoning. I'm sorry.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:50 pm to GrammarKnotsi
Capital One has the take a picture of your check to deposit it app? It still says it's under construction or coming soon on my phone.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:50 pm to The Mick
Banks have had to find other ways to make their profits after the Dodd-Frank banking law went into effect. That law limited some fees that banks could charge so banks just found different ways to make up the lost revenue.
The fee they charged you is a voluntary fee. You could avoid it by depositing the check into your account at your bank and withdrawing the cash. And the fee doesn't affect their customers.
The fee they charged you is a voluntary fee. You could avoid it by depositing the check into your account at your bank and withdrawing the cash. And the fee doesn't affect their customers.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:50 pm to The Mick
The easy way to avoid that fee is to deposit or cash the check at your own bank, or demand another form of payment. Access to cash on demand is a service and the bank takes a greater risk when cashing out to non-customers. You can look at the fee as compensation for taking that risk, or to subsidize losses from non-customer fraud, or a means to drive the hordes of unbanked workers to open an account with their payroll checks.
This post was edited on 7/2/14 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:51 pm to Aubie83
quote:Yeah, I know this. I have past banking experience. I also know I could have called and it would have said the funds were available and I put it in my account and 3 days later when it cleared his account the funds may not be there.
You could have just called. You are allowed to inquire if a certain account has sufficient funds to cover a check.
Posted on 7/2/14 at 2:52 pm to TigerPox
quote:Lots of banks, I would say most actually, don't verify funds anymore.
Yeah, I know this. I have past banking experience. I also know I could have called and it would have said the funds were available and I put it in my account and 3 days later when it cleared his account the funds may not be there.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News