Started By
Message

re: Huge BR Zoo news from Councilwoman Chauna Banks---Will Cover edition

Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:51 am to
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18670 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:51 am to
I think it is a waste of resources to move the zoo. They can update a few areas that need it for a fraction of the cost.

Posted by PiscesTiger
Concrete, WA
Member since Feb 2004
53696 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:53 am to
Meanwhile, I will drive the 70 miles to take mine to the Audubon Zoo.

What if the zoo moved right down the road from the casino?
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64666 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:54 am to
quote:

two yeras


need some whitesplaining.
Posted by Will Cover
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2007
38550 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 8:55 am to
Chauna is a great leader and does a tremendous job representing her district on the BR Metro Council. She is an asset to the community of Baton Rouge.

When speaking to people within the community, some adjectives that are used to describe Ms. Banks are articulate, compassionate, courageous (against whitey), impartial and aboveboard.

She's the Dytarsha of the EBRCOA. Always giving.



Posted by Jim Smith
Member since May 2016
2915 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:03 am to
Why do people in NRB care so much about the zoo? Nobody in NBR goes to the zoo.
Posted by gatorhater08
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2011
2456 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Why do people in NRB care so much about the zoo? Nobody in NBR goes to the zoo.


The "study" they should do is just ask every person buying a ticket their home zip code. I would love to see the breakdown by zip code after just 3 months. I assume the north br zip codes will have lowest attendance.
Posted by Flipadelphia
Member since Dec 2009
667 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:15 am to
quote:

The "study" they should do is just ask every person buying a ticket their home zip code


I believe that they already do that. They know where their attendance comes from, which is why they want to move it.
This post was edited on 6/23/17 at 9:30 am
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29267 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:15 am to
quote:

I think it is a waste of resources to move the zoo. They can update a few areas that need it for a fraction of the cost.



short sighted, small town thinking ^^^^^
Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90541 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:19 am to
Does her want mean anything?
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
20510 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

yeras


i don't get it
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79707 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:29 am to
The zoo will always be in North Baton Rouge. Even if they do move it.
Posted by Creamer
louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
2817 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:29 am to
I said some of this in the thread yesterday but the current location will never become a revenue asset to the city.

Zoo's need revenue from corporate events an wedding receptions to survive. That location will never be suitable for those clients

The current location also provides no benefit to the surrounding areas. The local citizens do not work at the zoo or go to the zoo. Also, the patrons of the zoo get food and gas before getting to that area specifically so they dont have to stop between the interstate exit and the zoo.

The 2 options are spend a ton of money on a depreciating asset that will never develop new revenue streams, or spend more initially and build a new zoo in a location that will benefit from the revenue streams that all other zoo's survive on.

This post was edited on 6/23/17 at 9:32 am
Posted by Solo
Member since Aug 2008
8245 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:39 am to
Do you hear that? That's the sound of St. George picking up more votes...
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18670 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:40 am to
quote:

short sighted, small town thinking ^^^^^


What a sound and articulated argument to discredit my point.

BR has immense infrastructure issues. Even if the money is donated, couldn't that money also be raised for a more pressing issue?

It's wasteful spending to move something like that when they could easy finish the restoration, and put the other proposed park in another location.

I've yet to see anything in the plan where the new zoo would be the central fixture in a greater commercial venture. Until that is done, then keep it where it is. Upgrade the vet facilities, put in an elephant enclosure that meets current standards, and refurbish the last remaining chainlink fence exhibits.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134865 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:43 am to
I completely agree. I oppose this move strictly on monetary grounds. It's a waste of funds. If it dies, it dies.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11296 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:43 am to
I watched the streaming feed from the video. She was spinning it like the Baton Rouge Area Foundation is some kind of evil entity. She's going over the people one by one on the survey and honestly they seemed pretty damn respectable and caring if you asked me.

Fairly insulting tone imo.

Reality is the zoo isn't utilized by north baton rouge. North baton rouge doesn't make money off of it. The study indicates if would do better elsewhere (which is obvious) but somehow it's become something to fight over as if the zoo is some huge asset to north baton rouge.

IE it's just a political version of the race card for the race pimps and hustlers.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98860 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:43 am to
In other news. Chauna Banks' daughter announces the creation of "ZooStudoes LLC," which is described as a cutting edge leader in the area of studies about the relocation of zoological parks in Louisiana metro areas of 750k or less.
Posted by Monsieur le Duc
Château de Chantilly
Member since Aug 2014
674 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

She was actually trying to compare the BR Zoo to Disney


Yes, the 43 square miles of theme parks located smack dab in the middle of a densely populated state is incredibly inconvenient to visit.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36053 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:46 am to
Or option three, save a pile of money by realizing that BREC is not capable of running a zoo like Audubon and that investing 140 million dollars with BREC in some grand scheme is foolish.

Instead let's fix up what we have now, improve segments until it's all modern.

This is not a racial issue, it's not a north v south issue; it's a financial issue. I have seen how BREC operates their parks, golf courses, baseball fields and their zoo; and I know they can't take care of what they have and giving them more to spend is crazy.

Posted by Jones
Member since Oct 2005
90541 posts
Posted on 6/23/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:


BR has immense infrastructure issues. Even if the money is donated, couldn't that money also be raised for a more pressing issue?


The people that are donating money for a new zoo are donating the money for a new zoo. They aren't donating piles of money for our shithead mayor and her crooks to spend elsewhere.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram