Started By
Message

re: Duck loving Canadian faces LIFE in prison for stopping on Hwy and causing wreck.

Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:29 am to
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:29 am to
How about the car stopped in the left lane, no matter for how long. I'm not saying she's 100% at fault but if she doesn't leave a parked car on the highway, this doesn't happen.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76602 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:30 am to
Jail doesn't cure stupid or prevent stupid people from doing stupid things. I'd be ok with taking her license away for life but jail is pointless in this case.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:30 am to
Probably a lot. Sounds like she admitted to purposefully stopping in the travel lane.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:32 am to
We'll agree to disagree on the jail time, but agree on the prevention part.
Posted by Charlie Arglist
Wichita, Kansas
Member since Nov 2012
5550 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

Probably a lot. Sounds like she admitted to purposefully stopping in the travel lane.


I agree, but I wonder if she would have faced ANY criminal charges if she just broke down and stopped in left lane causing a wreck....

ETA: Looks like she should have just STFU and lawyered up!!!!
This post was edited on 6/21/14 at 11:34 am
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48336 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:32 am to
quote:

If she had time to park and get out. How can you possibly say the motorcycle did not have enough time to react?


There is a reason why its so difficult to prove that the lead vehicle is responsible for a rear end collision.

Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
69255 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

even though stopping in the left lane is stupid, running into a parked car stopped in the left lane is stupider.

Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:34 am to
No doubt.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

There is a reason why its so difficult to prove that the lead vehicle is responsible for a rear end collision.
It's essentially impossible in the US. I know of nowhere where that isn't almost immediately the fault of the following car.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48336 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

How about the car stopped in the left lane, no matter for how long. I'm not saying she's 100% at fault but if she doesn't leave a parked car on the highway, this doesn't happen.


True, but by the same token if the motorcyclist is paying attention (assuming there is nothing important being left out of the story) then this doesn't happen.

Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76602 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:36 am to
quote:

ETA: Looks like she should have just STFU and lawyered up!!!!

She's likely a very kind, soft hearted person who was broken up by this and was willing to tell the cops everything to assist.

Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25588 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:36 am to
Vehicle braking is not negligent. Purposely parking on a travel lane and causing a death is negligent
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15370 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:36 am to
justice served.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:36 am to
Very much so, I believe his negligence is as much a part of this as hers.



This is assuming she was stopped long enough to actually park the car.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76602 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:36 am to
Yeah it's def negligent but I've never seen someone face life in prison for negligence.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19722 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:37 am to
She stopped in the damn middle of a highway and caused two people to be killed.

frick her for being a dumb bitch.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58397 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:37 am to
Don't know the laws, but I don't believe you are supposed to stop/swerve for animals on the roads. I also see this took place in Canada, so who knows.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19722 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:38 am to
quote:

True, but by the same token if the motorcyclist is paying attention (assuming there is nothing important being left out of the story) then this doesn't happen.


The OT never ceases to amaze me.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62920 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:39 am to
What if I pulled over to check my tire, and some idiot runs into my car killing himself?

I shouldn't be responsible for that. Pay fricking attention to the road.
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 6/21/14 at 11:39 am to
From the standpoint of insurance companies in the US, at WORST she'd be found 50% responsible given what we know at this point.

Not even negligent. This would have been investigated by police and nothing more would have happened.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram