- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: COA director Clark Amar suing the Plummer family
Posted on 5/5/17 at 7:44 am to Godfather1
Posted on 5/5/17 at 7:44 am to Godfather1
Go get her, Mike!
1
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:01 am to Spasweezy
Late to the game here, but I cant believe what I am reading on this woman. How has this LEACH not been fired from the COA?
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:03 am to Glock17
Hmmm.
1. Do some shady shite
2. Get called out on shady shite
3. Claim you weren't going to do shady shite
4. Sue people calling you out on shady shite
5. Profit?
1. Do some shady shite
2. Get called out on shady shite
3. Claim you weren't going to do shady shite
4. Sue people calling you out on shady shite
5. Profit?
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:48 am to Bunta
How can his hold up in court? I realize she has hired a scum bag attorney who has zero shame like her. But someone please chime in and tell me that any judge with an ounce of common sense would throw this in the garbage.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:51 am to bayou choupique
This has Anti-SLAPP written all over it. Here is our Anti-SLAPP statute:
quote:
Art. 971. Special motion to strike
A.(1) A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or Louisiana Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of success on the claim.
(2) In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings and supporting and opposing affidavits stating the facts upon which the liability or defense is based.
(3) If the court determines that the plaintiff has established a probability of success on the claim, that determination shall be admissible in evidence at any later stage of the proceeding.
B. In any action subject to Paragraph A of this Article, a prevailing party on a special motion to strike shall be awarded reasonable attorney fees and costs.
C. The special motion may be filed within sixty days of service of the petition, or in the court's discretion, at any later time upon terms the court deems proper. The motion shall be noticed for hearing not more than thirty days after service unless the docket conditions of the court require a later hearing.
D. All discovery proceedings in the action shall be stayed upon the filing of a notice of motion made pursuant to this Article. The stay of discovery shall remain in effect until notice of entry of the order ruling on the motion. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Paragraph, the court, on noticed motion and for good cause shown, may order that specified discovery be conducted.
E. This Article shall not apply to any enforcement action brought on behalf of the state of Louisiana by the attorney general, district attorney, or city attorney acting as a public prosecutor.
F. As used in this Article, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed to them below, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1) "Act in furtherance of a person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or Louisiana Constitution in connection with a public issue" includes but is not limited to:
(a) Any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law.
(b) Any written or oral statement or writing made in connection with an issue under consideration or review by a legislative, executive, or judicial body, or any other official body authorized by law.
(c) Any written or oral statement or writing made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest.
(d) Any other conduct in furtherance of the exercise of the constitutional right of petition or the constitutional right of free speech in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.
(2) "Petition" includes either a petition or a reconventional demand.
(3) "Plaintiff" includes either a plaintiff or petitioner in a principal action or a plaintiff or petitioner in reconvention.
(4) "Defendant" includes either a defendant or respondent in a principal action or a defendant or respondent in reconvention.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:55 am to FalseProphet
Per the Advocate:
These people have no shame.
quote:
LSU law professor Elizabeth Carter, who specializes in successions and trusts, has been closely following the dispute between Amar and the Plummer family. Looking over the typo-filled lawsuit Thursday evening, Carter said it was not a smart move for Amar to file it.
"Her reputation was already so damaged from things she did that had nothing to do with the succession, I think that would be difficult to show as well," Carter said.
These people have no shame.
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 8:59 am
Posted on 5/5/17 at 8:56 am to Drunken Crawfish
quote:
Carter said it was not a smart move for Amar to file it.
still hope for more embarrassment for her
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:02 am to Alt26
quote:
Her mother is a judge in EBR. Does anyone know which judge was assigned the case? Obviously it's (probably) not her mother.
It was actually alloted to Janice Clark. She will recuse herself. I wouldn't be suprised if all 8 civil judges that sit on the bench at the 19th recused themself also.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:05 am to Nado Jenkins83
Looks like she getting ready for some more hurt feelings,I hope the family responds with a counter suit, I think she's digging her own grave.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:08 am to rmc
quote:
t was actually alloted to Janice Clark. She will recuse herself.
Her mother is just as bad as her. Do you REALLY think she will recuse herself? If I had to bet, half the reason she filed this lawsuit was to be in her mother's court.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:10 am to rowbear1922
yeah. I'll put my house on it that she recuses herself. Literally. Anyone want to take the bet let me know.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:13 am to rmc
quote:
yeah. I'll put my house on it that she recuses herself. Literally. Anyone want to take the bet let me know.
She absolutely SHOULD. That doesn't mean she WILL.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:14 am to rmc
If she was smart she would,but who thinks she's smart.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:15 am to ole man
quote:
If she was smart she would,but who thinks she's smart.
That is kind of my point. Her first job out of law school was working for my dad....she didn't last long
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:17 am to ole man
She will. There is no gray area. Janice does a lot of stuff I don't care for/agree with but she will recuse herself here. Again I'd bet the farm she does.
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 9:19 am
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:17 am to Drunken Crawfish
quote:
the typo-filled lawsuit
I like that part. Haha.
Also, wouldn't this open her up to being questioned under oath about things not necessarily directly related to the civil suit to which she may not want out and may, therefore, perjure herself?
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:17 am to Drunken Crawfish
quote:
Looking over the typo-filled lawsuit
Well, of course.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:18 am to Glock17
Shotgun lawyer approach, see what sticks.
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:19 am to rowbear1922
And know she's a judge, imagine that.If i was an attorney I would represent the family
Posted on 5/5/17 at 9:20 am to ole man
quote:
And know she's a judge,
This still surprises me every time I see her.
This post was edited on 5/5/17 at 9:21 am
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News