Started By
Message

At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?

Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:48 pm
Posted by bdavids09
Member since Jun 2017
625 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:48 pm
I was watching a ww2 documentary few days ago and its amazing how 80 percent of Germanys loses were on the eastern front. So when the Americans joined the fight the Germans were badly weakened by the USSR. Its interesting how before Hitler turned on Stalin they were actually allies. I'm curious if Germany never attacks Russia could the US have defeated Germany when they were at full strength?
Posted by cubsfan5150
Member since Nov 2007
15758 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:49 pm to
Depends on how long we could have drug the war on... we would have defeated them eventually if we didn't fall immediately
Posted by Keep Stirring
Member since Sep 2016
2603 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:49 pm to
Two words: Manhattan Project


game, set, match
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84065 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:49 pm to
Nukes...
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
26123 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

At full strength who was more powerful in ww2 Germany or US?


The United States never attained “full strength”. If you’re asking which nation was stronger at their strongest during the war, the answer is the United States.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
39782 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:51 pm to
US could have sent soldiers all day every day even crossing an ocean.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
12396 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Two words: Manhattan Project


I’m sure some of those men would have liked to jam a fat boy up Hitler’s arse.
Posted by DomincDecoco
of no fixed abode
Member since Oct 2018
10849 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:54 pm to
I've heard the way to look at it is, at ______ point in time of the war, who was stronger.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29983 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:54 pm to
if hitler doesnt attack russia and japan doesnt attack pearl harbor russia and USA sit out ww2 and germany solidifies its power and control of all of europe
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm
Posted by Texas ellessu
East Bank of Ward's Creek
Member since Dec 2007
513 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:54 pm to
Yes, it would have taken longer. Russia wasn't really a German ally. They signed a non-aggression pact but I don't think Hitler never intended to keep his word. Stalin probably didn't expect Hitler to honor it for the agreed upon 10 year period.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
11242 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:55 pm to
Gotta consider the resources that Germany was using on the Eastern Front. We were fighting less than half of Germany's army

ETA: I'm an idiot.
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 4:42 pm
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:57 pm to
The timelines are not really aligned, but at full strength the USA was more powerful than Germany. This is also removing the nuclear equation.

The US had 50 million more people than Germany in 1940, the ability of those 50 million to contribute to the war effort would be enough. The US is also more abundant in natural resources for the production of weapons.

Germany did have us beat in scientist obviously, but we would eventually be able to overcome that.
Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22290 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65018 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Gotta consider the resources that Germany was using on the Eastern Front. We were fighting less than half of Germany's army


One must also consider the amount of resources that the United States was using in the Pacific. By 1944, we had nearly 3.7 million servicemen and women deployed in that theater of the war.
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 4:00 pm
Posted by Big Gorilla
Bossier City
Member since Oct 2020
5453 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm to
They weren't "stronger" then most, but their tank generals shocked the French and the eastern Europeans with Blitzkrieg. Before then, the world never saw attacks move that quickly.

If Germany doesn't attack Russia then yes, they would have owned all of western Europe before we even joined the war.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

Gotta consider the resources that Germany was using on the Eastern Front. We were fighting less than half of Germany's army


Were we not also in the Pacific as well?
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49576 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 3:59 pm to
US by far, damn Germans were still using horses.
Posted by tiger94gop
GEISMAR
Member since Nov 2004
2914 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:00 pm to
If you look at technical efficiency and strength of troops/general/etc. It would probably be Germany at the beginning of the war. We were no where near ready at the beginning of WWII. However, there are a few thing to take into account. Our population was far greater. The probability of attack on the US Mainland was highly unlikely. Maybe a random Sub, but no one was invading us at that time. So We may have lost some initial battles, but our infrastructure would be intact and we had the natural resources to eventually starve Germany out. We could have done the same to any nation, that is why it was such a horrible plan for Japan to attack us. The only thing that would have worked was if Hitler had been able to develop his weapons program before we did.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
11242 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Were we not also in the Pacific as well?


Yes.
Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3134 posts
Posted on 11/1/21 at 4:01 pm to
We fought a 2 front war also and beat Japan with the Pacific front getting way less material than the European Front plus we were arming our allies at the same time.
This post was edited on 11/1/21 at 4:03 pm
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram