- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saints met with Joe Mixon tonight...
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:52 am to lsupride87
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:52 am to lsupride87
quote:
(after he faked a punch at her btw)
which was after she physically pushed and assaulted him.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:55 am to Chad504boy
quote:Cool. To say "she smacked the shite out of him" is so disingenuous.
which was after she physically pushed and assaulted him.
I am fine with the saints wanting him at rb. Our society is built around second chances.
However, the tards in here trying to justify what he did is ridiculous
Posted on 3/8/17 at 10:56 am to JayJay2
If our research says he's found Jesus then draft him.
If it says he's still the same bitch who punches women then pass.
If it says he's still the same bitch who punches women then pass.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
Actually you may want to watch it again. It is obvious she initiated the physical part of the confrontation. Twice in fact. Obviously his retaliation to her assault was too much and he should be penalized. He could have and should have walked away but that doesn't excuse her part in it. I tell my students you have two options when someone wants to argue, argue back or let them argue with themselves. She not only chose to engage him but then compounded it by shoving then slapping him.
On to the topic i dont want to draft him. It has nothing to do with his assault. We have a great running back and i dont see the need to invest more resources in another one. We are not a running team and never will be. We don't run Ingram enough imo so why invest a valuable asset into an under utilized position. Now if we change our offense to a more run oriented one or he falls so low we can gain a better asset in trade then i am for it.
On to the topic i dont want to draft him. It has nothing to do with his assault. We have a great running back and i dont see the need to invest more resources in another one. We are not a running team and never will be. We don't run Ingram enough imo so why invest a valuable asset into an under utilized position. Now if we change our offense to a more run oriented one or he falls so low we can gain a better asset in trade then i am for it.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:12 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
You might want to rewatch the whole thing buddy.
I see the fake punch now.
quote:
She didn't even strike him. She kind of pushed his face away.
Nope. My point still stands. She initiated contact when she got up and pushed him. Up to that point the confrontation wasnt physical. She elevated it to that level. He even refrained from physical retaliation after she pushed him by if-ing at her as a warning that he wasnt going to be pushed around. She called his bluff and got knocked the frick out. Women, especially nowadays, think they can go around slapping men in the face(an extremely disrespectful thing to do) and pushing them around. The law says otherwise.
quote:
A 210 lb prime athlete then punched the living frick out of her with all of his strength.
I agree that the response was out of proportion but so is shooting a guy in the face and ending his life when hes beating you up but the laws is on the shooters side almost everytime. You CAN NOT be the aggressor in any confrontation and you will never garner sympathy from a court when you initial physical contact with someone.
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 11:13 am
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:17 am to nola000
quote:You seem like a sane, smart, stable individual
Nope. My point still stands. She initiated contact when she got up and pushed him. Up to that point the confrontation wasnt physical. She elevated it to that level. He even refrained from physical retaliation after she pushed him by if-ing at her as a warning that he wasnt going to be pushed around. She called his bluff and got knocked the frick out. Women, especially nowadays, think they can go around slapping men in the face(an extremely disrespectful thing to do) and pushing them around. The law says otherwise.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:19 am to lsupride87
quote:
I am fine with the saints wanting him at rb. Our society is built around second chances.
However, the tards in here trying to justify what he did is ridiculous
They say if it wasn't a woman, this would've blown over. Yet at the same time if he wasn't an athlete that people like, but just some random black guy, then the overwhelming majority of posters would be calling him a TPOS thug instead of declaring he did nothing wrong or deserves a second chance.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:20 am to TigerBait1127
quote:
Come on. It wasn't justified. She may have been in the wrong too, but he followed them into the store after words had already been exchanged.
Sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never hurt you. She initiated contact, twice. She has no case. Period.
quote:
Sure she shouldn't have touched him
You goddamn right!
quote:
but he shouldn't have followed her into the store
Its his right to travel where he wants for the most part. It would be hard to prove he entered the store with the specific and only intent to follow her considering it was a retail establishment.
quote:
and sure as shite shouldn't have decked her.
Again, he has legal standing to defend himself considering he didnt initiate physical contact.
quote:
And yes, having video proof of the incident will always make it worse publicly. It removes doubt of the situation
Video evidence is a double edged sword. It has to be complete, clear and include audio or it just becomes a tool for lawyers to paint whatever they want.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:22 am to nola000
quote:A 10 year old comes up and kicks you in the shin because he is mad you are a Saints fan. frick that little shite up right? He has no case, period!!!!!
Sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never hurt you. She initiated contact, twice. She has no case. Period.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:22 am to nola000
quote:He has legal standing to use reasonable force to defend himself. Please tell me you think that is what he did.......
Again, he has legal standing to defend himself considering he didnt initiate physical contact.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:25 am to NOFOX
quote:
They say if it wasn't a woman, this would've blown over. Yet at the same time if he wasn't an athlete that people like, but just some random black guy, then the overwhelming majority of posters would be calling him a TPOS thug instead of declaring he did nothing wrong or deserves a second chance.
Right. Which is why I always approach these things impartially with no emotional stake in it. Others here live in a very informal, laissez faire world. Thats not the country we live in. We live in a country of laws. A Republic. For which it stands.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
He has legal standing to use reasonable force to defend himself.
Right. You have to respond in kind, essentially.
In Oklahoma, the escalation in violence needs to be proportional to threat.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:26 am to lsupride87
quote:
You seem like a sane, smart, stable individual
Thank you.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:27 am to keakar
ok man
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 11:28 am
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:28 am to lsupride87
quote:
He has legal standing to use reasonable force to defend himself. Please tell me you think that is what he did.......
Yes. How is it not? If someone hits you in the face what are you supposed to do? He doesnt know what this woman is capable of. What if she pulls out her CCW and caps his arse out of feminazi anger? He quelled the threat.
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 11:29 am
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:29 am to CapperVin
I hope we draft him. frick everybody feelings.
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:30 am to keakar
quote:
actually no, the only time since payton has been here was with cooks, that was THE ONLY EXCEPTION I think payton even said after the draft that they didn't believe they were going to have ANY chance to get cooks when they talked to him before the draft
I agree, the saints have never ever talked to anyone before they drafted said player.. I can't believe that they'd sink millions of dollars into a person without at least talking to them first
Come on man, think about what you're saying
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:31 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
In Oklahoma, the escalation in violence needs to be proportional to threat.
You cant know what the potential threat may be. She showed malice and the propensity for violent confrontation. She may be a 4 billion degree black belt in the ancient art of Whoopyoass, Krav Maga, Akido or be packin a heater.
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 11:33 am
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:32 am to lsupride87
quote:
However, the tards in here trying to justify what he did is ridiculous
Come on bro, you can't expect everyone to feel the same way you do about such a polarizing situation
ETA - don't have a dog in the fight, I'm pretty apathetic about most of the shite that happens off the field
This post was edited on 3/8/17 at 11:33 am
Posted on 3/8/17 at 11:33 am to nola000
quote:
Sticks and stones may break your bones but words will never hurt you. She initiated contact, twice. She has no case. Period.
And yet he was charged and made an Alford plea....
All for having no case, period.
And she's going to easily get paid in her civil lawsuit too.
quote:
It would be hard to prove he entered the store with the specific and only intent to follow her considering it was a retail establishment.
If only he made a statement about his group following her into the store....
quote:
Again, he has legal standing to defend himself considering he didnt initiate physical contact.
Apparently not
quote:
Video evidence is a double edged sword. It has to be complete, clear and include audio or it just becomes a tool for lawyers to paint whatever they want.
This has already been settled in the court of law. He was guilty.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News