- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Another team interested in Anderson?
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:02 am to whoknows1390
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:02 am to whoknows1390
LOL it was a bit of a joke...
Ryno's name has come up separately with the Cavs and Warriors, if they miss out on Love... and now with the TWolves if they move Love... I just mixed the two, and added the contracts from the Cavs I think we'd be most likely to get in the deal. What is so hard to understand? Can you people name a player that it would be ok to take back?
Ryno's name has come up separately with the Cavs and Warriors, if they miss out on Love... and now with the TWolves if they move Love... I just mixed the two, and added the contracts from the Cavs I think we'd be most likely to get in the deal. What is so hard to understand? Can you people name a player that it would be ok to take back?
1
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:12 am to patendedgmf
Did you really just link a guy to his own article? 
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:21 am to patendedgmf
In all honesty it seems logical to trade ryno for a quality SF. This board doesn't want to part with him though, but IMO he doesn't fit this team and is a very good value.
What is our identity? We will have arguably the best defensive frontcourt in the league with the Asik addition and holiday and rivers are both solid defenders. Ryno for a solid SF defender that can score a few points would be ideal, although I have no clue who that particular player is. If we could get a similar value with a guy that can play some perimeter d I say we give it a look. Again, that player likely doesn't exist but it's fun to dream.
What is our identity? We will have arguably the best defensive frontcourt in the league with the Asik addition and holiday and rivers are both solid defenders. Ryno for a solid SF defender that can score a few points would be ideal, although I have no clue who that particular player is. If we could get a similar value with a guy that can play some perimeter d I say we give it a look. Again, that player likely doesn't exist but it's fun to dream.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:24 am to TigerinATL
Say we keep our pick because of protections next year. Are we allowed to now trade that pick in anyway we want for next year? And then Houston would just have our pick for the following year? Just curious
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:32 am to Peliclown
quote:the stipulations on what they would get if we keep the pick haven't been released yet. It usually has multiple year options, which would prevent us from trading away our 2016 1st until after it is resolved. If we keep the 2015 pick, sure we can trade it. We're probably gonna have to make the playoffs to keep it.
Say we keep our pick because of protections next year. Are we allowed to now trade that pick in anyway we want for next year? And then Houston would just have our pick for the following year? Just curious
This post was edited on 7/17/14 at 8:40 am
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:37 am to OceanMan
quote:
Ryno for a solid SF defender that can score a few points would be ideal, although I have no clue who that particular player is.
And that's the problem. The rumors of Ryno for Batum was the first Ryno trade that's piqued my interest. I think we're more likely to find our SF via FA or Asik style trade into cap space which means Gordon is the odd man out, not Ryno. I also disagree that he doesn't fit. You need the kind of versatility that we have in our 3 big rotation. San Antonio doesn't win the title without both Splitter and Diaw taking turns complimenting Duncan depending on the matchup.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:37 am to Peliclown
quote:
Say we keep our pick because of protections next year. Are we allowed to now trade that pick in anyway we want for next year? And then Houston would just have our pick for the following year? Just curious
No, it isn't our pick.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:39 am to Peliclown
quote:
Say we keep our pick because of protections next year. Are we allowed to now trade that pick in anyway we want for next year?
Yes. Say we're the 7th seed and pick #20, the 2015 pick is our pick to use as we see fit and we effectively owe our 2016 pick to Houston.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:40 am to Epic Cajun
It would be if it fell in the protected range.
Couldn't trade it right now, but could after the season if it was in the protected range.
Couldn't trade it right now, but could after the season if it was in the protected range.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:42 am to burdman
quote:
It would be if it fell in the protected range. Couldn't trade it right now, but could after the season if it was in the protected range.
I wasn't thinking
ETA: I was thinking he meant keep the pick, then trade the next years pick
This post was edited on 7/17/14 at 8:43 am
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:44 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Say we're the 7th seed and pick #20, the 2015 pick is our pick to use as we see fit and we effectively owe our 2016 pick to Houston.
They didn't get some sort of descending value for that? That's disappointing for an expiring contract. Hope they convey #19 next year.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:45 am to TigerinATL
The moral of the story is that Sandy needs to opt out after this season. That would give ~10mil in cap space to put toward a SF.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:46 am to patendedgmf
quote:
the stipulations on what they would get if we keep the pick haven't been released yet. It usually has multiple year options, which would prevent us from trading away our 2016 1st until after it is resolved. If we keep the 2015 pick, sure we can trade it. We're probably gonna have to make the playoffs to keep it.
I believe I read that the stipulations are 1-3, 20-30 protected for three seasons, then it turns into a second rd pick after that.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:48 am to patendedgmf
quote:
Pelicans receive:
SF, Anthony Bennett
PF, Tristan Thompson
That's bad. That's really, really bad.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:48 am to TigerinATL
We just need a cheap Kawhi Leonard, a cheap Manu, and a cheap Tony Parker to play with Asik AD and Ryno and we'd become the poor man's spurs!
oh, and a greg popovich.
oh, and a greg popovich.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:50 am to Mack
quote:
greg popovich
This is probably the equalizer
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:53 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Yes. Say we're the 7th seed and pick #20, the 2015 pick is our pick to use as we see fit and we effectively owe our 2016 pick to Houston.
If next year's pick is ours because it's 1-3, there will be wholesale changes all over the place.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:56 am to adono
Much more likely that it falls in the 20-30 range than the 1-3 range IMO. We were decimated by injuries last season and still had the 10th pick.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 8:57 am to Epic Cajun
Yeah, just have to hope that the injury bug doesn't strike again this year.
Posted on 7/17/14 at 9:04 am to Epic Cajun
quote:
Much more likely that it falls in the 20-30 range than the 1-3 range IMO. We were decimated by injuries last season and still had the 10th pick.
I think you're right. Don't forget that last season there were at least 4 teams that starting tanking at mid-season to get into the Wiggins sweepstakes. That #10 spot is actually worse than it looks like.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News