- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:28 pm to Cdawg
Gotcha. I´ve got to admit, I couldn´t and can´t stand heavy metal, but I was blown away the first time I heard Sweet Chile Of Mine.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:31 pm to northshorebamaman
actually yes and no if that makes sense.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:32 pm to Cdawg
quote:some people think only primo acts played the Roxy and Whisky A GoGo.
actually yes and no if that makes sense.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:33 pm to Cdawg
It doesn't really, but it explains why I was confused.
Care to elaborate?
Care to elaborate?
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:39 pm to northshorebamaman
Early on they were basically playing to the same crowds in LA so yeah, there was cross appeal.
Posted on 1/5/14 at 5:27 pm to Cdawg
quote:
Baloo, right or wrong, I'm going down with the ship on this one if I have to but you're again letting your dislike of one and love for the other distort the reality
I like Jane's Addiction. Not as much as GnR, but I do like them. Who doesn't like Jane Says?
quote:
That's fine but saying mid 80's Jane's was musically and aesthetically similar to hair bands like Poison is wrong. If you want to call Jane's glam b/c Perry looks liked a girl in dreadlocks instead of primped sprayed hair and they had some metal riffs here and there, I'll concede that. But the typical hair band of LA? no. GNR on the other hand, was exactly that while Jane's was considered the alternative band. You're trying to claim that little hint of punk and make them something they weren't and then totally discount the bigger influence of janes.
Well, they weren't a hair metal band. But they were influenced by glam, as was the hair metal bands. They are far more arty band than shite like Crue or Poison, so actually, they serviced their influences a lot better. There's actually a statistical chance Marc Bolan would like Jane's Addiction, unlike almost every hair metal band. I agree they weren't a "typical" hair metal band. They weren't hair metal. Neither was G'n'R. Both played the Strip and came up in those same venues, but I thin both bands equally hated Cinderella and all that crap. They just attacked hair metal from the other side as the grunge guys. In fact, if you'll remember, Axl was a huge advocate of Nirvana in the early days, before they turned on him, too. Like I said, glam rock heavily influenced both art rock and hair metal, Jane's Addcition clearly was the first pole, as they alienated crappy hair metal audiences. Glam was actually good, remember? And not all that mainstream. So calling Jane's "alternative" doesn't refute their glam roots.
quote:
Appetite was a hard rock album from the likes of the Stones, Zep, ACDC, Halen, which was the same type of music popular and influential with the hair bands. Only GNR didn't look the part even though they were pushed that way with welcome to the jungle video. Appetite was mainstream and the popularity was built by the hair band sound and fans.
I think there's more Dolls influence than you'd like to admit, but I generally agree. G'n'R was destroying hair metal from within.
quote:
Jane's wasn't a mainstream act in 87,88, or 89. Their popularity actually grew from the actual punks of LA. In 88' GNR was out touring with Motley Crue, Aerosmith, and the likes while Janes was hitting the smaller circuits with Iggy and The Ramones.
Ummm.... you realize Iggy has huge glam roots? Iggy is proto-punk, but he was a contemporary of the glam guys, particularly Bowie. The Ramones are also 70s NYC punk, and if you remember, I've argued that American hardcore had largely moved away from that. When I refer to "punk", I was referring to hardcore, which the Ramones were not. In fact, the hardcore bands largely held the 70s NYC punk scene in contempt. It was way too arty, even the Ramones.
quote:
Am I wrong but are you arguing that since Jane's looked more like a glam metal band, they were vs GNR didn't look like one, so they weren't? That's what it seems.
I'm arguing no such thing. I'm arguing BOTH bands had huge glam rock influences. And I'm using glam rock to refer to stuff like 70s T Rex, not 80s guys wearing spandex. Those guys were also influenced by glam, just in the worst way possible.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 11:25 am to Baloo
I forgot about this little gem of a thread.
I can detect your sarcasm.
all that other stuff you type is just to agree with me that Jane's was pretty much grunge like before it was called that.
I still <3 you Baloo.
quote:
Who doesn't like Jane Says?
I can detect your sarcasm.
all that other stuff you type is just to agree with me that Jane's was pretty much grunge like before it was called that.
I still <3 you Baloo.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 1:46 pm to Cdawg
quote:
But the typical hair band of LA? no. GNR on the other hand, was exactly that
That's not how we saw them in the late '80s. Back then, all we had was thrash bands like Metallica and Megadeth and the shite hair bands like Poison and Warrant.
Then here comes Guns 'N Roses. They were something else. Hair bands didn't sing songs called 'Your fricking Crazy' or have lyrics like "Turn around bitch I've got a use for you", nor did they have the sophisticated songwriting and arranging seen on tracks like Rocket Queen.
quote:
Appetite was mainstream and the popularity was built by the hair band sound and fans.
While hair band fans did like GNR too, us thrash/speed metal kids in small towns like Zachary liked them because they were dirty and from the streets and weren't polished and had a strong edge to them.
GNR was definitely more Stones/Aerosmith influenced than punk influenced. The only one of them that had a punk background was Duff.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:05 pm to Sayre
quote:
That's not how we saw them in the late '80s.
That's b/c nobody wants to be associated with the worst music ever. That's why i defended Janes the way i did. I was pointing out that GNR was more closely associated with what he was trying to label Janes. It's not like I don't like GNR, I've been a fan of them since they I saw them open for The Cult in '87. I was just calling it like it is/was. My buddy Baloo just doesnt' care for Janes and I have a soft spot for them through the late 80's. It would be akin to me attacking Green Day. He wouldnt' just sit back and take it.
quote:
They were something else.
I agree and that's why they survived and kept on doing their thing.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:27 pm to Cdawg
I've enjoyed this thread as well. But you're really misreading my intentions. I kinda like Jane's and i wasn't being sarcastic about Jane's Says. I think Jane's and GnR were very similar, and both were trying to take down hair metal from within. Grunge just came from a different place, they owed more to the SST bands. I don't see being heavily influenced by glam rock as a BAD thing.
I will admit that I get ticked when people who have no punk credentials whatsoever attack Green Day for not being punk. I didn't see your arse at the 7 Seconds show.
I will admit that I get ticked when people who have no punk credentials whatsoever attack Green Day for not being punk. I didn't see your arse at the 7 Seconds show.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 2:47 pm to Baloo
You know what's funny is I should go back to the New York Dolls and give then another shot. When I worked at Sammy's, there was a cook there that was a Rocky Horror type guy. You know the obnoxious costume at midnight and show count type and would play the NY Dolls all the time. Needless to say, I was not a fan then. But it probably had more to do with him than the band.
Unfortunately I do not get yard passes as frequently as i use to. 7 Seconds would wear me out now. I prefer the more mellow shows now.
:oldmantake:
Unfortunately I do not get yard passes as frequently as i use to. 7 Seconds would wear me out now. I prefer the more mellow shows now.
:oldmantake:
Posted on 1/10/14 at 3:55 pm to Cdawg
To be honest, you aren't missing much. Their influence is huge, but their influence is so great that the thing that made them unique doesn't seem that unique anymore. Just get Johnny Thunders' solo work.
Yeah, I can't do punk shows anymore. Even Ian MacKaye has gotten mellow. The Evens is more my pace these days (though I like some rocking out, too).
To circle this back to Cobain, that's why I think his career would've taken the Mark Lanegan route. Screaming Trees were great, but he's now spent the bulk of his career doing dark, mellow music that sounds like the soundtrack to a suicide.
Yeah, I can't do punk shows anymore. Even Ian MacKaye has gotten mellow. The Evens is more my pace these days (though I like some rocking out, too).
To circle this back to Cobain, that's why I think his career would've taken the Mark Lanegan route. Screaming Trees were great, but he's now spent the bulk of his career doing dark, mellow music that sounds like the soundtrack to a suicide.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 7:45 pm to Cdawg
quote:
You know what's funny is I should go back to the New York Dolls and give then another shot. When I worked at Sammy's, there was a cook there that was a Rocky Horror type guy. You know the obnoxious costume at midnight and show count type and would play the NY Dolls all the time. Needless to say, I was not a fan then. But it probably had more to do with him than the band.
When it comes to the Dolls, I think you had to be there at that time to get them. I've tried my mightiest to get into them, but their recorded work just straight out mostly sucks. I imagine seeing them live at Max's Kansas City was pretty awesome though.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 7:50 pm to Cdawg
quote:
I agree and that's why they survived and kept on doing their thing.
GNR ended as far as I'm concerned after Lies when Izzy quit and Steven got canned and Axl basically made it into his own personal solo act. The Use You Illusion albums are a world away from Appetite's sleazy rawness. They're overproduced schmaltz, with a few notable exceptions.
Posted on 1/10/14 at 8:16 pm to Sayre
quote:
after Lies when Izzy quit and Steven got canned and Axl basically made it into his own personal solo act. The Use You Illusion albums are a world away from Appetite's sleazy rawness
Izzy is all over Use Your Illusions. My favorite tracks are him singing lead, Dust n Bones and 14 Years.
This post was edited on 1/10/14 at 8:18 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News