Started By
Message

re: Westworld S01 E09: "The Well-Tempered Clavier"

Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to
Trying to catch up, but HBOGo fricking blows.
Posted by vilma4prez
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2009
6428 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:16 pm to
I thought the same thing!

When he yelled, I was like damn, he's going McPoyle on them..

If there is a scene with him requesting milk I will lose it
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:47 pm to
Thought just occurred to me. How was Delores able to kill Arnold (if we take her memory of doing it at face value, of course)? Where were the safeguards that we know the hosts have by the time William and Logan got to the park?

It just would add another tragic layer to the story if Ford and Arnold never considered that their creations would kill so they never bothered to make sure they couldn't kill... until they did and Ford instituted his control system and started down the path to where he is now. He always talks of the early days wistfully as days filled with joy, optimism, and creation, which is in pretty stark contrast to the manner in which old Ford acts. It would be so much more interesting if his rigid control and cold view toward the hosts was a result, in some great part, of he and Arnold's early optimism, naivete, successes, and their ultimate failure that led to Arnold's death. As their creations gain more and more humanity, Ford loses more and more of his.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 6:55 pm
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15012 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:14 pm to
Chronologically, I think Dolores killed Arnold before the events with William. Also, the hosts are unable to hurt humans because of programming, but Arnold was messing around with that in an attempt to spark real intelligence so in all likelihood Dolores overrode her programming to kill folks.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51345 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:38 pm to
Why did the host kill Bernard? The one who killed Teddy.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:46 pm to
Uh. Bernard killed himself.
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32776 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:04 pm to


That is gold.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51345 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:27 pm to
Watch the scene where teddy is sheriff and kills everyone.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66377 posts
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:43 pm to
Just caught up. LOL at this thread

Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go. Pathetic

Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:46 am to
I'm in the middle of Episode 8, and I love it so far, but no way in hell would those two guys go along with Maeve in all this. Seriously, Sylvester should just go "frick this. She's at best Ava from Ex Machina and will kill us to get her freedom, and best case scenario we'll get canned when she escapes. So I'm ratting her out and getting her destroyed by the people running this joint."

Her plotline just pisses me off on how much those two are going along with it. She has no collateral on them, not to mention the fact that there should be cameras on them at all times and colleagues are walking around seeing them through glass walls. Someone needs to sit the writers down and let them know that there's no possible way this would work with rational people.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:52 am
Posted by Merck
Tuscaloosa
Member since Nov 2009
1693 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:40 am to
I've seen it as red beard is just a sniveling coward who talks a big game but has no balls and Asian tech guy is too enthralled with the idea of her actually gaining consciousness to want to stop her.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112238 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:34 am to
Yeah the Asian is passed the point of black mail. He's full on her side

I think some parallels can be made between the two lab techs and the William timeline

Asian guy and William both see them as real beings and fall in love

Red head and Dickhead BiL see them as hosts and are trying to make them see that
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66377 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:02 am to
quote:

I'm in the middle of Episode 8, and I love it so far, but no way in hell would those two guys go along with Maeve in all this.


Yes, it's easily the worst part of the show. Totally unbelievable. As if they wouldn't power her stats back down and send her to QA
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21092 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:35 am to
quote:

Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go.


Flashbacks have been a part of the story "from the get-go." I maintain that many of you haven't really been watching the show, you're just getting theories from other sites and coming here to argue "semantics" for the sake of arguing. I almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up.
Posted by Merck
Tuscaloosa
Member since Nov 2009
1693 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:54 am to
quote:

almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up.


Thank you for saying it! I felt like it has been pretty obvious the past few episodes and then showing the picture Abernathy found was almost spoon feeding it to us.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13163 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 6:43 am to
quote:

Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go.


Your point is well taken but definition of terms matter. I do think there can be confusion relative to the term, timeline. Per Wiki:

"A timeline is a way of displaying a list of events in chronological order, sometimes described as a project artifact.[1] It is typically a graphic design showing a long bar labelled with dates alongside itself and usually events."

My perspective is that the timeline that represents the events from the beginning of the founding of Westworld to current events is the same timeline just as the events from the creation of planet earth to our current history is the same timeline. The alternative is some alternate reality/universe (Example: Hitler was never born so the course of events took a completely different path). And yes, time periods within the master timeline can obviously be referenced separately as specific time frames. I see no evidence that there is a separate timeline/alternate universe relative to Westworld. But yes, various time periods are being referenced through flashbacks.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 8:35 am
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 8:28 am to
Watched it. Bernard isn't even in that scene, nor would he be since he wasn't even created yet.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 8:29 am
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66377 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Flashbacks have been a part of the story "from the get-go."


No kidding

quote:

I maintain that many of you haven't really been watching the show, you're just getting theories from other sites and coming here to argue "semantics" for the sake of arguing. I almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up


shite like this is why people have been calling you out specifically for the entirety of this thread. You're butthurt that you were wrong so you try and belittle people who we're right. Newsflash: everyone in this thread reads r/westworld, whether they admit it or not. Anyone that takes the time to watch multiple times, come here and discuss, formulate theories, etc is going to pool from multiple sources. To reduce this type of person to someone who just wants to argue and can't keep up on their own is insanely, ridiculously pompous, and completely intellectually dishonest. No one is buying that shite. You were wrong, eat your crow and move on.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66377 posts
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Your point is well taken but definition of terms matter. I do think there can be confusion relative to the term, timeline. Per Wiki:


"Timeline" has been the term of choice on every site from the start. I think most people know that it's not a literal alternate timeline scenario i.e. A timeline where hitler was a dictator and a timeline where hitler was a priest instead, it's just a term that sounds good and people can pick up on the implication pretty easily. Clearly, it is one sequence of events with events from different points in time being shown, the term "timeline" was just the given name for these different points for whatever reason
first pageprev pagePage 19 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram