- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Westworld S01 E09: "The Well-Tempered Clavier"
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Posted on 11/30/16 at 5:29 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Trying to catch up, but HBOGo fricking blows.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:16 pm to Byron Bojangles III
I thought the same thing!
When he yelled, I was like damn, he's going McPoyle on them..
If there is a scene with him requesting milk I will lose it
When he yelled, I was like damn, he's going McPoyle on them..
If there is a scene with him requesting milk I will lose it
Posted on 11/30/16 at 6:47 pm to ell_13
Thought just occurred to me. How was Delores able to kill Arnold (if we take her memory of doing it at face value, of course)? Where were the safeguards that we know the hosts have by the time William and Logan got to the park?
It just would add another tragic layer to the story if Ford and Arnold never considered that their creations would kill so they never bothered to make sure they couldn't kill... until they did and Ford instituted his control system and started down the path to where he is now. He always talks of the early days wistfully as days filled with joy, optimism, and creation, which is in pretty stark contrast to the manner in which old Ford acts. It would be so much more interesting if his rigid control and cold view toward the hosts was a result, in some great part, of he and Arnold's early optimism, naivete, successes, and their ultimate failure that led to Arnold's death. As their creations gain more and more humanity, Ford loses more and more of his.
It just would add another tragic layer to the story if Ford and Arnold never considered that their creations would kill so they never bothered to make sure they couldn't kill... until they did and Ford instituted his control system and started down the path to where he is now. He always talks of the early days wistfully as days filled with joy, optimism, and creation, which is in pretty stark contrast to the manner in which old Ford acts. It would be so much more interesting if his rigid control and cold view toward the hosts was a result, in some great part, of he and Arnold's early optimism, naivete, successes, and their ultimate failure that led to Arnold's death. As their creations gain more and more humanity, Ford loses more and more of his.
This post was edited on 11/30/16 at 6:55 pm
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:14 pm to TigerstuckinMS
Chronologically, I think Dolores killed Arnold before the events with William. Also, the hosts are unable to hurt humans because of programming, but Arnold was messing around with that in an attempt to spark real intelligence so in all likelihood Dolores overrode her programming to kill folks.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:38 pm to sbr2
Why did the host kill Bernard? The one who killed Teddy.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 9:46 pm to prplhze2000
Uh. Bernard killed himself.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:04 pm to Byron Bojangles III
That is gold.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:27 pm to ell_13
Watch the scene where teddy is sheriff and kills everyone.
Posted on 11/30/16 at 10:43 pm to prplhze2000
Just caught up. LOL at this thread
Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go. Pathetic
Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go. Pathetic
Posted on 12/1/16 at 12:46 am to Carson123987
I'm in the middle of Episode 8, and I love it so far, but no way in hell would those two guys go along with Maeve in all this. Seriously, Sylvester should just go "frick this. She's at best Ava from Ex Machina and will kill us to get her freedom, and best case scenario we'll get canned when she escapes. So I'm ratting her out and getting her destroyed by the people running this joint."
Her plotline just pisses me off on how much those two are going along with it. She has no collateral on them, not to mention the fact that there should be cameras on them at all times and colleagues are walking around seeing them through glass walls. Someone needs to sit the writers down and let them know that there's no possible way this would work with rational people.
Her plotline just pisses me off on how much those two are going along with it. She has no collateral on them, not to mention the fact that there should be cameras on them at all times and colleagues are walking around seeing them through glass walls. Someone needs to sit the writers down and let them know that there's no possible way this would work with rational people.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 12:52 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 1:40 am to OMLandshark
I've seen it as red beard is just a sniveling coward who talks a big game but has no balls and Asian tech guy is too enthralled with the idea of her actually gaining consciousness to want to stop her.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 2:34 am to Merck
Yeah the Asian is passed the point of black mail. He's full on her side
I think some parallels can be made between the two lab techs and the William timeline
Asian guy and William both see them as real beings and fall in love
Red head and Dickhead BiL see them as hosts and are trying to make them see that
I think some parallels can be made between the two lab techs and the William timeline
Asian guy and William both see them as real beings and fall in love
Red head and Dickhead BiL see them as hosts and are trying to make them see that
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:02 am to OMLandshark
quote:
I'm in the middle of Episode 8, and I love it so far, but no way in hell would those two guys go along with Maeve in all this.
Yes, it's easily the worst part of the show. Totally unbelievable. As if they wouldn't power her stats back down and send her to QA
Posted on 12/1/16 at 3:35 am to Carson123987
quote:
Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go.
Flashbacks have been a part of the story "from the get-go." I maintain that many of you haven't really been watching the show, you're just getting theories from other sites and coming here to argue "semantics" for the sake of arguing. I almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 4:54 am to PowerTool
quote:
almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up.
Thank you for saying it! I felt like it has been pretty obvious the past few episodes and then showing the picture Abernathy found was almost spoon feeding it to us.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 6:43 am to Carson123987
quote:
Some of the timeline deniers went as low as to imply "I knew it was multiple time periods, I said it wasn't multiple timelines" as if we'd believe it was a semantic argument from the get-go.
Your point is well taken but definition of terms matter. I do think there can be confusion relative to the term, timeline. Per Wiki:
"A timeline is a way of displaying a list of events in chronological order, sometimes described as a project artifact.[1] It is typically a graphic design showing a long bar labelled with dates alongside itself and usually events."
My perspective is that the timeline that represents the events from the beginning of the founding of Westworld to current events is the same timeline just as the events from the creation of planet earth to our current history is the same timeline. The alternative is some alternate reality/universe (Example: Hitler was never born so the course of events took a completely different path). And yes, time periods within the master timeline can obviously be referenced separately as specific time frames. I see no evidence that there is a separate timeline/alternate universe relative to Westworld. But yes, various time periods are being referenced through flashbacks.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 8:35 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 8:28 am to prplhze2000
Watched it. Bernard isn't even in that scene, nor would he be since he wasn't even created yet.
This post was edited on 12/1/16 at 8:29 am
Posted on 12/1/16 at 9:59 am to PowerTool
quote:
Flashbacks have been a part of the story "from the get-go."
No kidding
quote:
I maintain that many of you haven't really been watching the show, you're just getting theories from other sites and coming here to argue "semantics" for the sake of arguing. I almost feel bad for the people who can't keep up
shite like this is why people have been calling you out specifically for the entirety of this thread. You're butthurt that you were wrong so you try and belittle people who we're right. Newsflash: everyone in this thread reads r/westworld, whether they admit it or not. Anyone that takes the time to watch multiple times, come here and discuss, formulate theories, etc is going to pool from multiple sources. To reduce this type of person to someone who just wants to argue and can't keep up on their own is insanely, ridiculously pompous, and completely intellectually dishonest. No one is buying that shite. You were wrong, eat your crow and move on.
Posted on 12/1/16 at 10:06 am to GurleyGirl
quote:
Your point is well taken but definition of terms matter. I do think there can be confusion relative to the term, timeline. Per Wiki:
"Timeline" has been the term of choice on every site from the start. I think most people know that it's not a literal alternate timeline scenario i.e. A timeline where hitler was a dictator and a timeline where hitler was a priest instead, it's just a term that sounds good and people can pick up on the implication pretty easily. Clearly, it is one sequence of events with events from different points in time being shown, the term "timeline" was just the given name for these different points for whatever reason
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News