Started By
Message

re: The REAL Terminator Genisys Trailer

Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:17 am to
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14422 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 9:17 am to
quote:

The more I watch it, the worse it gets. The Terminator franchise is dead to me.


I understand. If its any consolation, whether this Terminator is a hit or not, it's not going to have any sequels.

James Cameron gets the property rights back soon and I'm pretty sure he said, he's not doing anymore Terminators. He most likely will not stick to that but at least we'll get a long break and then when/if Terminator come's back, it'll be a Cameron film.
Posted by PillageUrVillage
Mordor
Member since Mar 2011
14811 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 10:32 am to
I think they revert back to him in 2020. I believe they are trying to make a new trilogy. It can be done. That doesn't necessarily mean it should be done.

ETA: 2019. Just looked it up.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 10:36 am
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
7362 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:05 am to
From Screen Rant:
"Paramount has now officially dated the two sequels to Genisys for theatrical release in 2017 and 2018, respectively, which lends credence to those older rumors that the films will shoot back to back over the course of nine months.
The first Genisys sequel (which is being called Terminator 2 for now) will reach theaters on May 19th, 2017; that’s one week after a currently-untitled Marvel Studios film (possibly either Inhumans or Thor 3) is due for arrival. Terminator 3 will follow just over a year after on June 29th, 2018."
Of course Genisys could be a total flop and non of this happens. I believe MCG had plans for two more movies after Salvation and that never happened.
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 11:07 am
Posted by PillageUrVillage
Mordor
Member since Mar 2011
14811 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

which is being called Terminator 2 for now
Posted by Murray
Member since Aug 2008
14422 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:35 am to
quote:

I think they revert back to him in 2020. I believe they are trying to make a new trilogy. It can be done. That doesn't necessarily mean it should be done. ETA: 2019. Just looked it up.


Oh ok, well I hope he doesn't just sit on the property like he's implied or said.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12790 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Why would a T800's skin age?


I'm probably wrong, but i thought i read somewhere that arnold(as an old guy) would play a human scientist that had a role in creating the t800(thus explaining who the t800 was modeled after)
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8628 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 11:54 am to
Okay, I am actually kind of pumped.

My interest has been peaked.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:08 pm to
Looks incredibly stupid.

And Emilia Clark is a fat chick waiting to happen. Irrelevant, but just thought I'd share.
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18300 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Ok I'm in
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:30 pm to
i started a Sarah Connor Chronicles rewatch today
This post was edited on 12/5/14 at 4:30 pm
Posted by BaddestAndvari
That Overweight Racist State
Member since Mar 2011
18300 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

Ok I'm still in, even after reading all of the pessimistic comments, screw all of you!


fixed it
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28892 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:42 pm to
as one of the biggest fans of T1 and T2, I am not at all pumped about this movie. The acting looked bad, the future looked too clean for a post apocalyptic world, and it gets too timey wimey.

The first two were classics. Hell, the third would have been good had they either stuck with Ed Furlong(who had the druggie secluded act down pat) or got someone who seemed kind of tough. Stahl was not a believable 20-something Connor imo. But it still felt like a terminator movie.

I don't know what Salvations was supposed to be...
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

as one of the biggest fans of T1 and T2, I am not at all pumped about this movie
anything related to terminator no matter how bad it looks will get me hard
Posted by Fearthehat0307
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2007
65256 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Ok I'm still in, even after reading all of the pessimistic comments, screw all of you!

fixed it
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71776 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

had they either stuck with Ed Furlong(who had the druggie secluded act down pat

Think he had the druggie part down too well for them to cast him.
Posted by saintsfan92612
Taiwan
Member since Oct 2008
28892 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 5:03 pm to
I know, which is a shame. Just his and Hamilton's apparent camaraderie with Ahnold would have helped the movie tremendously.

There was a lot wrong with 3:

No Cameron being #1 of course.

No Sarah Connor being #2 Linda Hamilton was supposed to be in the movie but said the script was terrible and didn't want to ruin the first 2 movies. I mean having Sarah fricking Connor die between movies from god damned Leukemia? Who wouldn't have rather seen her die fighting the reprogrammed Ahnold at the end?

Casting being #3 Conner and his girl were both awful.

The campy humor being #4. T1 and 2 had really good comedic moments without being over the top trying to be funny, imo. The gay bar and some of the other humor just felt off in this universe.

The movie wasn't too bad and it actually set up John Conner's survival and eventual rise to power (he was the only one alive who knew wtf was going on) but it could have been a lot better with better direction/acting

Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71776 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 5:37 pm to
quote:


No Sarah Connor being #2 Linda Hamilton was supposed to be in the movie but said the script was terrible and didn't want to ruin the first 2 movies. I mean having Sarah fricking Connor die between movies from god damned Leukemia? Who wouldn't have rather seen her die fighting the reprogrammed Ahnold at the end?


I kinda disagree. If you include Sarah she has to die pretty early because you have to see John become his own man.
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31205 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

frick the haters. can't wait
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram