- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Martian Tomatometer Watch Thread - 94%
Posted on 10/1/15 at 9:24 am to Salamander_Wilson
Posted on 10/1/15 at 9:24 am to Salamander_Wilson
Reading some of those negative reviews reminds me that movie critics are probably the most valueless humans on the planet.
0
Posted on 10/1/15 at 10:09 am to Salamander_Wilson
i heard the 3D was supposed to be great for it, please let me know which format i should see it in.
anyone see the Watney Under Armour Commercial?
anyone see the Watney Under Armour Commercial?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 10:25 am to Floating Change Up
quote:
Andy talking about the line
I just watched this entire video. Great stuff regarding the background of the book and film.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 10:27 am to Wooly
In my opinion, if the 3D makes you think, "Ooh, that's a good 3D effect" it's taking you out of the film. Having graphics floating above the screen and parts of a spaceship pointing out for dramatic 3D effect seem excessive to me.
If you like 3D for the bells and whistles, you'll enjoy it. I didn't think that it added to the story itself or to my enjoyment of the film.
I'll be seeing it again in 2D. It's a great mix of Apollo 13 and 2010.
If you like 3D for the bells and whistles, you'll enjoy it. I didn't think that it added to the story itself or to my enjoyment of the film.
I'll be seeing it again in 2D. It's a great mix of Apollo 13 and 2010.
Posted on 10/1/15 at 11:03 am to Twenty 49
quote:
The preview looks interesting, and the reviews are overwhelmingly positive, but the same was true of Gravity. I was eager to see Garvity but hated it.
I hope Damon is better than Clooney and Bullock.
This is what gives me pause about seeing it. There were such raving reviews about Gravity but I thought it was very pedestrian when I saw it.
For those who have seen both - is this one similar at all to Gravity other than the whole "space" thing?
Posted on 10/1/15 at 11:34 am to Methuselah
Not at all similar to Gravity in my opinion. Very different tone.
The Martian is like Castaway mixed with Apollo 13, but lighthearted and funny.
Gravity was simply mesmerizing to me. I really got sucked into it and felt the isolation of space.
Gravity does a better job of making you feel what space may be like. The Martian does a better job of making you think "damn, that's a kickass movie",
The Martian is like Castaway mixed with Apollo 13, but lighthearted and funny.
Gravity was simply mesmerizing to me. I really got sucked into it and felt the isolation of space.
Gravity does a better job of making you feel what space may be like. The Martian does a better job of making you think "damn, that's a kickass movie",
Posted on 10/1/15 at 12:51 pm to Methuselah
Gravity completely ignored orbital mechanics and physics in general. The entire movie was impossible.
Whereas in The Martian, making the orbital mechanics work is a huge part of the story and largely realistic. The book glosses over the science on a few things, but for the most part it's all possible with today's technology.
Whereas in The Martian, making the orbital mechanics work is a huge part of the story and largely realistic. The book glosses over the science on a few things, but for the most part it's all possible with today's technology.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 3:33 am to BoostAddict
Saw it....not sure how to rate it.
Its not a bad film, but I am stuck comparing it to the book.
They missed big time on the humor element of the book IMO. Flashes of it was there, but they skipped a lot of it.
MILD SPOILERS
While I expected them not to be able to cover the science of what he was doing and the factors of his situation, they took it a step further and whitewashed pretty much ALL of his struggles. As far as I can tell, the only problem Mark had other than isolation was having to endure disco. No problems or issues other than that. Pretty much twiddling his thumbs waiting for time to pass.
No trial and error to figure out how to manufacture enough water. No cowering in the rover for days as he realized that he fricked up and turned the whole Hab atmosphere to hydrogen.
The trip to the MAV was the worst....no dust storm and no tumble of the rover. No loss of communication to NASA due to a momment of dumbassery. It was literally just a 5 minute montage across Mars. They spent more airtime to bring up the whole space pirate crap in multiple situations than to any problem. Even when they insinuate a problem with their earth bound testing, it never really materializes in any form in practice.
I've seen joy rides with more stress than what he suffered on his long trip to the crater. Hell, at least half of the 5 minute montage of the trip was showing him just chilling and sleeping.
Apparently that was his biggest problem on the trip: the boredom.
Even with the included Hab breach, they toned down the danger. He didn't pull a miracle out of his arse after recovering. Nah...just slap some ducttape on it, and he is good to take a leisurely stroll, checking out plants and stuff, before getting a new helmet and calmly walking back to the rover.
I know the run time was 2 hours and therefore things had to be cut.
But the whole story is that of survival on such a harsh and inhospitable world. Gimme SOME adversity. frick.
I'll give the movie this though: its ending is far superior to the book ending of "I reek to an absurdly shocking degree but hey, all of humanity worked together to bring me home so we are all okay"
Its not a bad film, but I am stuck comparing it to the book.
They missed big time on the humor element of the book IMO. Flashes of it was there, but they skipped a lot of it.
MILD SPOILERS
While I expected them not to be able to cover the science of what he was doing and the factors of his situation, they took it a step further and whitewashed pretty much ALL of his struggles. As far as I can tell, the only problem Mark had other than isolation was having to endure disco. No problems or issues other than that. Pretty much twiddling his thumbs waiting for time to pass.
No trial and error to figure out how to manufacture enough water. No cowering in the rover for days as he realized that he fricked up and turned the whole Hab atmosphere to hydrogen.
The trip to the MAV was the worst....no dust storm and no tumble of the rover. No loss of communication to NASA due to a momment of dumbassery. It was literally just a 5 minute montage across Mars. They spent more airtime to bring up the whole space pirate crap in multiple situations than to any problem. Even when they insinuate a problem with their earth bound testing, it never really materializes in any form in practice.
I've seen joy rides with more stress than what he suffered on his long trip to the crater. Hell, at least half of the 5 minute montage of the trip was showing him just chilling and sleeping.
Apparently that was his biggest problem on the trip: the boredom.
Even with the included Hab breach, they toned down the danger. He didn't pull a miracle out of his arse after recovering. Nah...just slap some ducttape on it, and he is good to take a leisurely stroll, checking out plants and stuff, before getting a new helmet and calmly walking back to the rover.
I know the run time was 2 hours and therefore things had to be cut.
But the whole story is that of survival on such a harsh and inhospitable world. Gimme SOME adversity. frick.
I'll give the movie this though: its ending is far superior to the book ending of "I reek to an absurdly shocking degree but hey, all of humanity worked together to bring me home so we are all okay"
This post was edited on 10/2/15 at 4:29 am
Posted on 10/11/15 at 8:27 am to Volvagia
Plan on seeing this today. To 3d or not?
Posted on 10/11/15 at 8:38 am to JinFL
Also plan to see it today.
Posted on 10/11/15 at 8:57 am to JinFL
I don't remember 3d having that many opportunities to shine.
Posted on 10/11/15 at 8:57 am to JinFL
I don't remember 3d having that many opportunities to shine.
Posted on 10/11/15 at 9:18 am to JinFL
I saw in non 3d, no regrets. Saw few times 3d would have been cool except for ending.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News