- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oppenheimer | Official Reaction Thread | Spoilers
Posted on 8/12/23 at 7:00 pm to 3nOut
Posted on 8/12/23 at 7:00 pm to 3nOut
Fantastic movie. It was my first time watching a movie in IMAX also. I enjoyed that. My only complaint is I couldn’t pause it at times to google shite lol. I want to read the book it’s based on now.
I have seen comments about the music being too loud at times. I can agree with that in the closing part of the security clearance interrogation. Could have done without that dramatic effect.
3/4ths of the way through the movie I wondered why Rami Malek would take that role but when he showed up at the end for the congressional appointment I got it.
I have seen comments about the music being too loud at times. I can agree with that in the closing part of the security clearance interrogation. Could have done without that dramatic effect.
3/4ths of the way through the movie I wondered why Rami Malek would take that role but when he showed up at the end for the congressional appointment I got it.
Posted on 8/12/23 at 8:57 pm to crimsonsaint
I was glad to see Josh Hartnett back on the big screen. Hope we see him in some more films.
Posted on 8/12/23 at 9:06 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
was glad to see Josh Hartnett back on the big screen. Hope we see him in some more films.
He had a nice comeback in Wrath of Man which I would highly recommend. Not a lead role but played his part well.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 2:28 am to Salamander_Wilson
quote:
As hyped as I was to see this movie, I left somewhat disappointed. I liked it. But I expected to love it.
Just watched it in 70mm. Couldn’t agree more, was quite a snoozer if I’m being honest. 6.5/10
Posted on 8/18/23 at 3:09 am to vuvuzela
Yeah, the movie doesn’t quite take advantage of the IMAX 70mm format like it was initially marketed towards, but it’s still a decent movie overall.
Posted on 8/18/23 at 11:34 pm to RollTide1987
I thought this movie was terrible. They focused on the wrong things and strung it out way too long. This could have been a much more powerful movie if they cut 1/3 of it
This post was edited on 8/18/23 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 8/19/23 at 8:02 am to JPLSU1981
quote:
I thought this movie was terrible. They focused on the wrong things and strung it out way too long. This could have been a much more powerful movie if they cut 1/3 of it
I agree. Seems 25% was about his personal life the next 25% about the bomb and 50% about the politics Oppenheimer had to deal with.
I almost walked out after the bomb part and they were interrogating people. Glad I stayed to see what the conversation between Oppenheimer and Einstein by the lake was about. Einstein telling him the thank you for your work party will be for them and not him.
This post was edited on 8/19/23 at 8:03 am
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:05 am to JPLSU1981
quote:
I thought this movie was terrible. They focused on the wrong things and strung it out way too long. This could have been a much more powerful movie if they cut 1/3 of it
While I wholeheartedly disagree with you, I’m genuinely curious what you think should have been cut out and what was the “wrong things” they focused on?
I think it’s also worth noting that the movie is based on American Prometheus, a biography of Oppenheimer and not solely focused on the creation of the bomb by itself.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 11:52 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
I think it’s also worth noting that the movie is based on American Prometheus, a biography of Oppenheimer and not solely focused on the creation of the bomb by itself.
This.
The film is called Oppenheimer for a reason. It's a biopic about his life and not solely about the creation of the atomic bomb. If you want that there's a solid film starring Paul Newman as Leslie Groves that was released in 1989 called Fat Man and Little Boy.
Posted on 8/19/23 at 3:02 pm to Marciano1
quote:
Awesome movie and had no idea until now that Gary Oldman was playing Harry Truman.
Gary Oldman trying to play every pivotal WWII leader. See him next as Stalin
Posted on 8/21/23 at 5:36 pm to RollTide1987
This is a top 3 film of Nolan in my opinion. Very well done!
Posted on 8/21/23 at 6:26 pm to BigNastyTiger417
I’m so ready to watch it again. Soon.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 6:56 am to ell_13
quote:
I got a physics degree. I took quantum mechanics with no other students. I just went to the professor’s office.
That reminds me of one of my favorite scenes. It’s when Opp 1st gets to Berkley and after meeting Josh Hartnett in the lab (very underrated performance btw—I thought he was great) and then leaves to go teach his 1st class to his only 1 student. He gets on the chalk board and has something drawn on there, and asks the student if light acts as protons or waves. Then doesn’t let the student answer and says “it’s both.” Student says, “but that’s impossible, it can’t be both.” And Opp says, “I know. But it is.”
Reminded me of the 1st time I actually understood something about quantum mechanics. I had heard the term before, but didn’t really know much about what it meant. Until somebody on the OT started a thread about the double split experiment with a little cartoon illustration. Blew my fricking mind. I remember being in the office/computer room and trying to wrap my head around how an “observer” could change the way light acts (not the right word, but it’ll have to do) simply by observing it.
Then I had all these crazy epiphanies. I remember saying to myself “the question isn’t ‘if a tree falls in the woods and there’s nobody there to hear it, does it really make a sound?’ The question is if there’s nobody there to hear/observe it, is there really even a tree? Or woods?”
I convinced myself that my living room through the door didn’t exist until I walked into it. To “observe it.” Went down a huge rabbit hole and got to the the philosophical/theological train of thought that some people used “The Observer” as proof of God. If the universe exists, there has to be something outside of it to be able to observe it (i.e. God).
And God as Creator is a theme of Oppenheimer that I haven’t heard anybody discuss. They don’t mention it in the film, but it’s clearly in the subtext. Oppenheimer as God, his weapon giving him absolute power over life and death. Or at least death. And that burden is obviously alluded when he quotes the God Vishnu in the Bhagadav Gita, saying “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.” Which he’s almost as famous for as building the bomb itself. He realized his profound responsibility as the creator of bomb making him in a way the creator of death itself. The potential death of all mankind. Heavy shite.
But there’s also the theme of Oppenheimer as God when he’s compared to the Greek God Prometheus. It’s on the title card before the film starts, in a kinda too-on-the-nose dialogue exchange, and of course, the film is based on the book American Prometheus . Prometheus giving fire to Man could be see as creating the new, modern man, who could use that fire to evolve by being able to cook their meat, but could also use it as a weapon to destroy his fellow Man. Like Oppenheimer, what responsibility did Prometheus have to make sure his his newly “created,” modern man would wield that powerful tool correctly?
And I can’t believe I’m the 1st to make this connection, but speaking of Prometheus, Creators and their creations, and modern man, has nobody picked up on the allusion to Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein? Whose actual title is Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus? That book is all about having power over life and death and the profound responsibility that the Creator has to its Creation. Not just to nurture and protect it for itself, but to protect others/mankind from being killed/destroyed by IT.
Sorry for rambling. But there are some pretty profound themes this film is dealing with slightly under the surface. It’s not just an interesting biopic. There’s some heavy shite going on here.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 7:42 am to Hot Carl
quote:
Until somebody on the OT started a thread about the double split experiment with a little cartoon illustration.
Link? I’d like to see this.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 8:10 pm to meeple
quote:
Link? I’d like to see this.
The thread or the YouTube video? I’m sure I could find the video, but the thread was somewhere around ‘06-‘08, so that might be tricky. I’ll look, though.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 8:12 pm to GetCocky11
"Curious how the real Nolan fanboys will feel about this one. Apparently it isn’t the mind bending Nolan that we’re all used to."
I haven't watched it but don't plan on it either (and I'm a Nolan Homer). Nothing about the movie or story interests me.
I haven't watched it but don't plan on it either (and I'm a Nolan Homer). Nothing about the movie or story interests me.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 8:35 pm to EthanHunt007
quote:it was a solid movie, great acting across the board and the story was interesting enough but it’s not some movie that will go down as one of the best ever as some in this thread paint it out to be. Worth it to see it once but I don’t see how anyone could go back for more than one viewing. Genius intellect struggles with being a piece of shite in his personal life. Not like we haven’t seen that before.
I haven't watched it but don't plan on it either (and I'm a Nolan Homer). Nothing about the movie or story interests me.
Posted on 8/29/23 at 8:39 pm to Hot Carl
quote:and all of this is where the quantum mechanics guys lose grip on reality. This is the thought process of a 4 year old. Yes shite exists just because you don’t see it. If I blow your best friends brains out in the next room, when you walk in that motherfricker will be dead, even if you didn’t see me pull the trigger. He will still be dead even if you never walk into the room to look upon his actual dead body.
the question isn’t ‘if a tree falls in the woods and there’s nobody there to hear it, does it really make a sound?’ The question is if there’s nobody there to hear/observe it, is there really even a tree? Or woods?” I convinced myself that my living room through the door didn’t exist until I walked into it. To “observe it.
You aren’t being smart. Your just being a jackass
This post was edited on 8/29/23 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 8/29/23 at 9:04 pm to Hawgnsincebirth55
Yeah, you can get rightly fricked. Do you think I actually believe(d) that? It was just me finally coming to the understanding of the concept. The theory. But I left it there.
And even if I did believe all that was actual reality, what about that could possibly paint me as jackass? Ridiculously aggressive—and embarrassingly stupid—reply to that post, you dumb fricking, tiny dick cocksucker.
quote:
Your just being a jackass
And even if I did believe all that was actual reality, what about that could possibly paint me as jackass? Ridiculously aggressive—and embarrassingly stupid—reply to that post, you dumb fricking, tiny dick cocksucker.
Posted on 8/30/23 at 9:36 am to Hot Carl
quote:because it’s stupid?? My bad jackass wasn’t nice. Smug twat is more accurate. Like a South Park character smelling his own farts. But I get it, all of you people loved Oppenheimer because of how “deep” and “meaningful” it was. Wow nukes can destroy the world?! I never realized that but now I do!
And even if I did believe all that was actual reality, what about that could possibly paint me as jackass?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News