Started By
Message
locked post

Just watched "The Hunger Games" ---- wow

Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:32 am
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:32 am
What an abysmally stupid movie, and I'm guessing it's because the source material is stupid. Somebody please tell me there's a better story within the books than the crap that I just witnessed. No sense, whatsoever, of any social desperation or fear or hysteria or dementia that would allow such an event... no sense of history that would lead to such a point... no sense of outrage or protest, as one would expect, from at least a small segment of the population... a story with no sense, whatsoever.

I couldn't help but compare it to "The Running Man"... was it a ripoff thereof? Couldn't touch it... couldn't match the depravity of the audience or the genius of Richard Dawson... nor the exhilaration in the fights. Hell, even "The Truman Show" was miles better in depicting the character and motives and emotions of its live public audience.

"1984" this wasn't.

And maybe I missed something... it was only a small part of my dissatisfaction, anyway... but how is it that holograms can actually eat people?


Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66414 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:33 am to
2nd worse cinematography ever behind the 30 minutes I saw of Contraband
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:33 am to
Yeah it was pretty boring
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31919 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:37 am to
The book is much better. The first book is actually pretty good, parts of the second are too. Third one is terrible
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:37 am to
quote:

What an abysmally stupid movie, and I'm guessing it's because the source material is stupid. Somebody please tell me there's a better story within the books than the crap that I just witnessed. No sense, whatsoever, of any social desperation or fear or hysteria or dementia that would allow such an event... no sense of history that would lead to such a point... no sense of outrage or protest, as one would expect, from at least a small segment of the population... a story with no sense, whatsoever.



Yeah, the book actually explains all that. The movie is just completely rushed all the way through and removes some key elements. It was very disappointing to me.

This is a pretty spot on review of what is wrong with the movie: LINK
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66414 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:40 am to
i haven't heard one person ever say the 3rd was enjoyable
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
31919 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:41 am to
quote:

i haven't heard one person ever say the 3rd was enjoyable

Bc it isn't
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 12:43 am to
The movie is a watered-down version of the book. It removed some of the novel's more violent and adult themes to secure a PG-13 rating.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33939 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 1:11 am to
A movie so shitty that even Jennifer Lawrence's acting couldn't save it.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 1:33 am to
quote:

A movie so shitty that even Jennifer Lawrence's acting couldn't save it.


To be fair, Katniss is a pretty boring character in the 1st book.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30394 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 1:51 am to
quote:

cinematography


It was like watching 10 minutes of Mao's Last Dancer combined with all of The Running Man.
The cinematography for the "action" scenes was no better than Running Man's was filming in some indoor studio in 1987.
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11917 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 2:51 am to
quote:

I couldn't help but compare it to "The Running Man"

Same here. I didn't think Hunger Games was bad but I didn't read the books so I have no clue how true it is/was.
Posted by poncho villa
DALLAS
Member since Jul 2010
17702 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 2:53 am to
like someone else already said, the first two books are pretty good. The last one is probably one of the worst books in terms of trying to understand what the frick is going on.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39731 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:23 am to
Heck, I didn't think the book was much better.

Just a different take on Battle Royale, Running Man, or The Long Walk.

Toned down to get PG-13 when it clearly should be R.
Posted by Rittdog
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed
Member since Oct 2009
9955 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:48 am to
quote:

i haven't heard one person ever say the 3rd was enjoyable



The 3rd was enjoyable













Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64206 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:54 am to
Nah the books are horrendously written. I actually thought the movie was significantly better.
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10510 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:56 am to
It was a dumb plot to begin with. If the movie was that bad I don't see how a book could make it better.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
77965 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 7:59 am to
Is Hunger Games the new cool movie to hate on now?
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25239 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Is Hunger Games the new cool movie to hate on now?

Well, this is the Movie/TV Board.

I liked it and care not what anyone thinks. It could have been better, easily, but I thought it was cast pretty well. Not as good as the book, but is any movie ever as good as its paper counterpart?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65082 posts
Posted on 3/18/13 at 8:15 am to
quote:

i haven't heard one person ever say the 3rd was enjoyable


I found the third one enjoyable up until the end of the book. As I got closer and closer to the final pages, I wondered how the author was going to wrap the story up with so little time remaining. Then I read the end and found she couldn't wrap it up. One of the worst endings to a book I have ever read.

ETA: Admittedly, I did like the tone of the ending if that makes sense.

This post was edited on 3/18/13 at 8:16 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram