Started By
Message

re: Whether you want to admit it or not, Kaepernick may actually win his case.

Posted on 10/16/17 at 10:20 am to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 10:20 am to
quote:

That there was a market for his services?
That's not it nor was it relevant to his opting out, so what frick ups were there?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 10:20 am to
quote:

What will happen to all the NFL owners who are supporting the kneel downs in the league.
Wait, what?
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15316 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:19 pm to
Kap still being out of the league is not about talent. It's about signing him being a bad business decision.

Are there owners out there who immediately refused to sign him because he kneeled for the anthem. I don't doubt it. But i guarantee for the mass majority. It was a lot deeper than that. Is Kap better than some starting qbs right now. Sure. But the upgrade is marginal. Not only that, he will be a huge distraction to any team he signs too. Also he will alienate fans who don't agree with his views. No owner wants to deal with that if he doesn't have to.

Now, if this was Russel Wilson or Cam Newton who did what Kap did, guarantee they would still be on a roster.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Uhm, because it's a lot easier to punish one person than an entire team


You are a goddamn idiot.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66948 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

That's not it nor was it relevant to his opting out, so what frick ups were there?


You're right. He most likely was going to be cut anyway. I forgot about that detail
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56529 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Whether you want to admit it or not, Kaepernick may actually win his case.
The 17th all time leader in passer rating (higher than Carr, Stafford, and Luck) who the last time he played put up a 4:1 TD to INT ratio should be employed all things considered. If Kap had never sat he would have a job. Now I think it should be the owners decision but to act like this won't be a battle on the NFLs part is stupid. All it's gonna take is one judge who wants to be in on one of the biggest sports rulings ever and this shite is gonna blow up



He actually has to prove collusion. You realize this, right?

He's going to have to explain why he's being singled out when so many other players are doing what he did.

He's going to have to explain why he decided to opt out of his contract.

He's going to have to explain how his actions off the field weren't reason enough to naturally dissuade owners to stay away from him.

You seem to think that the decision would be based on whether or not his talents make him good enough to have a job.

He has to prove that the NFL owners got together and agreed together that none of them would sign him. If he can do that, he'll have a case.

IMO, this case won't even be heard.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50312 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Are we dismissing the part where Colin opted out of his contract. He also started and publicized this movement. He wore socks calling cops pigs. He wore a Fidel Castro t shirt to a press conference. He is a fricking nightmare PR problem. Plenty of good players can't find work because of baggage they carry off the field. He does not have a case unless all the owners got together and agreed no one would sign him. That's not what is happening.


Not to mention his racist girlfriend (IWHI) already sabotaged his potential signing with the Ravens.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56529 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Only a fool couldn't see that he is being blackballed to a certain degree. Joe Flacco has 4 TD to 8 INT and averaging like 5 yards a pass. Do you honestly believe that Kaep couldn't do better?


Just as I expected when I read your first post. You don't know what collusion or being "blackballed" is. You think weighing the issues he brings off the field into the equation equals collusion.



It's always funny to see someone totally ignorant calling others a fool.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:29 pm to
I'd bang the racist right out of her if I were single
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
50312 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I'd bang the racist right out of her if I were single


To rip off "Curb Your Enthusiasm"

I'll frick the hate out of you!
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80231 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:43 pm to
The fact that he declined a $12 Million option destroys any claim he has.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

The fact that he declined a $12 Million option destroys any claim he has.


Why would that matter in any way?
This post was edited on 10/16/17 at 12:50 pm
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25585 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:45 pm to
Why does a team have to sign him? Why is it illegal for a team to not to want to sign him, for whatever reason it is?

This is on ESPN's page right now in reference to the Pelicans:

quote:

Lowe's 32 crazy predictions: Long stay in NOLA for DeMarcus Cousins? Who else is lavishing Cousins with the max? At least half the league has (or claims to have) an ironclad "No Boogie" rule.


Should Cousins sue the NBA for having owners claim they have a "no Boogie" rule?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

The fact that he declined a $12 Million option destroys any claim he has.

Why does that matter?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Why does a team have to sign him?
A team does not have to sign him.

quote:

Why is it illegal for a team to not to want to sign him, for whatever reason it is?
It is not illegal for a team not to sign him.

Why are you asking me these questions????

quote:

Should Cousins sue the NBA for having owners claim they have a "no Boogie" rule?
If he has evidence that they are colluding, yes. If not, no.

Again, why are you asking me these questions?
Posted by icegator337
Lafayette
Member since Jan 2013
3496 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 2:52 pm to
should he have a job in the NFL?

yes, he's far more talented than most back ups

will he be able to prove collusion in a court of law?

I'm very doubtful on that
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34508 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:12 pm to
Everyone in this thread has said the same thing, just in different words
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
25585 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Again, why are you asking me these questions?



I don't recall phrasing my questions to you specifically in any way, just replying to the last post.


Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110879 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

just replying to the last post.
Well, that'll do it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56529 posts
Posted on 10/16/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

should he have a job in the NFL?

yes, he's far more talented than most back ups




His negatives outweigh whatever talent he brings to the table.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram