Started By
Message

re: Westbrook triple double on 100% shooting

Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:52 am to
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40976 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:52 am to
Most were wrong about Houston, and you absolutely were wrong about OKC. You had them as a .500 team that wouldn't come close to 50 wins.

Both Houston and OKC have played better than predicted. Why is that so hard for you to admit in conjunction?
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:52 am to
That's bc your squad ain't threatening any records. And your MVP candidate is about 20x less likely to win the award than James.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4424 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

It won't. Look at the standings. CC is all but locked into 3.


I know. I was asking a hypothetical.
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30114 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:53 am to
quote:

That's bc your squad ain't threatening any records. And your MVP candidate is about 20x less likely to win the award than James.



MVP is a team accomplishment, yup
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:55 am to
no shite Sherlock what part of it always going to a player on a top 3 seed would make you think it wasn't?
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83483 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:56 am to
quote:

and you absolutely were wrong about OKC. You had them as a .500 team that wouldn't come close to 50 wins.
By Boom's logic, Boom thinks Russ should win the MVP.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:56 am to
It would depend on the matchups.

THis year I'd rather have the 3 seed and a MVP over the two seed an no MVP. Because HOU beats the Spurs either way IMO. Other years I may prefer the higher seeding.
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 10:57 am
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40976 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:56 am to
quote:

So in order to discredit Westbrook's MVP argument, Houston posters have resorted to arguing the minimally subjective nature of the assist stat.


Which is hilarious because OKC has been basically elite at home...and a lottery team on the road.

Guess the OKC stat guys are so effective they are able to alter outcomes of home games with their assist bumps!
Posted by JJBTiger2012
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
1891 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:57 am to
James is the MVP... King James that is. The league has been reaching for a hero since he last won the MVP award. Dudes the best in the league and best on the planet. Next in line is K. Leonard.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

your squad ain't threatening any records


Just extended the longest streak of 50 win seasons in NBA history, but thanks for playing

quote:

your MVP candidate is about 20x less likely to win the award than James.


Never once cared whether Kawhi won it or not. Cool that he's in the discussion, I guess, but that's not what we play for in AC. Hell, he finished 2nd in MVP race last year and wasn't even really trying

Thinking Harden will win it. And kudos to him if he does.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:58 am to
Their net rating is prertty close to a .500 team. In other words in a typical year they would be right at .500

What I admittedly missed on was how bad the rest of the conference would be.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110979 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Which is hilarious because OKC has been basically elite at home...and a lottery team on the road.

Guess the OKC stat guys are so effective they are able to alter outcomes of home games with their assist bumps!

Anyone know how to look up assists opportunities? I know it's tracked, wondering if there's a way to find that in home/road splits.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40976 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:03 am to
This team is a weird one. They've started to win some blowouts, but most of the year, their wins were close games yet their losses were blowouts.

Think that has something to do with it being so low for a team that will finish somewhere between the 7-10th best team in the NBA.
Posted by Boomshockalocka
Member since Feb 2004
59695 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:04 am to
Okc preseason win total in vegas - 45.5
Projected wins - 47



HOU preseason win total in vegas - 41.5
Projected wins - 57

So we got a team who is 1.5 wins over and one who is 15+. And you just put them in the same sentence.

Please
Bro
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27307 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Never once cared whether Kawhi won it or not. Cool that he's in the discussion, I guess, but that's not what we play for in AC. Hell, he finished 2nd in MVP race last year and wasn't even really trying Thinking Harden will win it. And kudos to him if he does.
The Spurs also haven't won less than 50 games in a season in 20 years and have 5 championships, 6 Finals appearances, and have had 2 MVP winners over that time.

Of course you wouldn't give a shite if Kawhi won the MVP. Neither would I if I was a Spurs fan.
This post was edited on 3/23/17 at 11:07 am
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30114 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:08 am to
quote:

The Spurs also haven't won less than 50 games in a season in 20 years and have 5 championships, 6 Finals appearances, and have had 2 MVP winners over that time.

Of course you wouldn't give a shite if Kawhi won the MVP. Neither would I if I was a Spurs fan.



they play for Finals MVP while the rest of the plebs play for regular season MVPs
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:09 am to
quote:

The Spurs also haven't won less than 50 games in a season in 20 years and have 5 championships, 6 Finals appearances, and have had 2 MVP winners over that time.

Of course you wouldn't give a shite if Kawhi won the MVP. Neither would I if I was a Spurs fan.


Never gave much of a shite when David or Tim was up for the award, either, ijs

Definition for MVP shifts a lot. Not worth getting too worked up over, IMO.
Posted by redfishfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
4424 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Definition for MVP shifts a lot. Not worth getting too worked up over, IMO.


Agree. I feel like the voters are always looking for the next big thing. The two years Nash won it were a joke as well as the year Rose won it.
Posted by okietiger
Chelsea F.C. Fan
Member since Oct 2005
40976 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:20 am to
These threads are so old man. Someone posts accomplishment Westbrook has achieved and it turns into Boom just shitting everywhere.

What Russ has done with this team is unreal. Look at the first year post-Shaq in Orlando and first year post-LBJ in Cleveland for comparison.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60198 posts
Posted on 3/23/17 at 11:22 am to
quote:

What Russ has done with this team is unreal. Look at the first year post-Shaq in Orlando and first year post-LBJ in Cleveland for comparison.


No one is saying Penny Hardaway or Mo Williams are better than Westbrook.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram